From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Cc: "Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Sia Jee Heng" <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
"Alireza Sanaee" <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
"Zhenyu Wang" <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
"Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 10:40:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyrXGPlVfAVUCfTO@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b00ec74-4dda-48d4-b74f-9ce45cf1a429@linaro.org>
Hi Philippe,
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 10:54:07PM +0000, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 22:54:07 +0000
> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology
>
> Hi Zhao,
>
> On 1/11/24 09:33, Zhao Liu wrote:
> > Hi Paolo,
> >
> > This is my v5, if you think it's okay, could this feature get the final
> > merge? (Before the 9.2 cycle ends) :-)
>
>
> > ---
> > Zhao Liu (8):
> > i386/cpu: Don't enumerate the "invalid" CPU topology level
> > hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic
> > qapi/qom: Define cache enumeration and properties for machine
> > hw/core: Check smp cache topology support for machine
> > hw/core: Add a helper to check the cache topology level
>
> Since the first patches aim to be generic I took the liberty to
> queue them via the hw-misc tree. The rest really belongs to the
> x86 tree.
Thank you! I'm glad I could catch the last train for version 9.2.
> > i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology
> > i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration
> > i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine
> > Alireza Sanaee (1):
> > i386/cpu: add has_caches flag to check smp_cache configuration
> >
I'll continue to push the rest during the merge window of v10.0.
Thanks,
Zhao
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-01 8:33 [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] i386/cpu: Don't enumerate the "invalid" CPU topology level Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic Zhao Liu
2026-04-28 8:42 ` Ewan Hai
2026-04-28 9:43 ` EwanHai
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] qapi/qom: Define cache enumeration and properties for machine Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support " Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] hw/core: Add a helper to check the cache topology level Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-11-01 8:33 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] i386/cpu: add has_caches flag to check smp_cache configuration Zhao Liu
2024-11-05 22:54 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-11-06 2:40 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyrXGPlVfAVUCfTO@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox