* [PATCH] rtmutex_api: remove definition of mutex_lock_killable_nested
@ 2025-05-30 7:51 Paolo Bonzini
2025-05-30 14:14 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2025-05-30 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, kvm; +Cc: Randy Dunlap, Peter Zijlstra
Commit fb49f07ba1d9 ("locking/mutex: implement mutex_lock_killable_nest_lock")
removed the "extern" declaration of mutex_lock_killable_nested from
include/linux/mutex.h, and replaced it with a macro since it could be
treated as a special case of _mutex_lock_killable. It also removed a
definition of the function in kernel/locking/mutex.c.
However, it left the definition in place in kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c,
which causes a failure when building with CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=y. Drop it as
well now.
Fixes: fb49f07ba1d9 ("locking/mutex: implement mutex_lock_killable_nest_lock")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
index 191e4720e546..0c26b52dd417 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
@@ -544,13 +544,6 @@ int __sched mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(struct mutex *lock,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_interruptible_nested);
-int __sched mutex_lock_killable_nested(struct mutex *lock,
- unsigned int subclass)
-{
- return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_KILLABLE, subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_killable_nested);
-
void __sched mutex_lock_io_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass)
{
int token;
--
2.43.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rtmutex_api: remove definition of mutex_lock_killable_nested
2025-05-30 7:51 [PATCH] rtmutex_api: remove definition of mutex_lock_killable_nested Paolo Bonzini
@ 2025-05-30 14:14 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2025-05-30 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini, linux-kernel, kvm; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Hi,
On 5/30/25 12:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Commit fb49f07ba1d9 ("locking/mutex: implement mutex_lock_killable_nest_lock")
> removed the "extern" declaration of mutex_lock_killable_nested from
> include/linux/mutex.h, and replaced it with a macro since it could be
> treated as a special case of _mutex_lock_killable. It also removed a
> definition of the function in kernel/locking/mutex.c.
>
> However, it left the definition in place in kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c,
> which causes a failure when building with CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=y. Drop it as
> well now.
>
> Fixes: fb49f07ba1d9 ("locking/mutex: implement mutex_lock_killable_nest_lock")
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This patch fixes part of the build errors that I was seeing, but I
still have these:
In file included from ../include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:5,
from ../include/uapi/linux/types.h:14,
from ../include/linux/types.h:6,
from ../include/linux/kasan-checks.h:5,
from ../include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:26,
from ./arch/x86/include/generated/asm/rwonce.h:1,
from ../include/linux/compiler.h:390,
from ../include/linux/export.h:5,
from ../include/linux/linkage.h:7,
from ../include/linux/preempt.h:10,
from ../include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from ../kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:5:
../include/linux/stddef.h:8:14: error: expected declaration specifiers or ‘...’ before ‘(’ token
8 | #define NULL ((void *)0)
| ^
../include/linux/mutex.h:215:60: note: in expansion of macro ‘NULL’
215 | #define mutex_trylock(lock) _mutex_trylock_nest_lock(lock, NULL)
| ^~~~
../kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:589:13: note: in expansion of macro ‘mutex_trylock’
589 | int __sched mutex_trylock(struct mutex *lock)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:602:15: error: ‘mutex_trylock’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘ww_mutex_trylock’?
602 | EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_trylock);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../include/linux/export.h:76:23: note: in definition of macro ‘__EXPORT_SYMBOL’
76 | extern typeof(sym) sym; \
| ^~~
../include/linux/export.h:89:41: note: in expansion of macro ‘_EXPORT_SYMBOL’
89 | #define EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym) _EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym, "")
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c:602:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘EXPORT_SYMBOL’
602 | EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_trylock);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ---
> kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c | 7 -------
> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
> index 191e4720e546..0c26b52dd417 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
> @@ -544,13 +544,6 @@ int __sched mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(struct mutex *lock,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_interruptible_nested);
>
> -int __sched mutex_lock_killable_nested(struct mutex *lock,
> - unsigned int subclass)
> -{
> - return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_KILLABLE, subclass, NULL, _RET_IP_);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_killable_nested);
> -
> void __sched mutex_lock_io_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass)
> {
> int token;
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-30 14:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-05-30 7:51 [PATCH] rtmutex_api: remove definition of mutex_lock_killable_nested Paolo Bonzini
2025-05-30 14:14 ` Randy Dunlap
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).