public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
	<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] x86/virt/tdx: Unbind global metadata read with 'struct tdx_tdmr_sysinfo'
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:38:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a107b067-861d-43f4-86b5-29271cb93dad@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96c248b790907b14efcb0885c78e4000ba5b9694.camel@intel.com>

On 7/08/24 15:09, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-08-05 at 18:13 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Huang, Kai wrote:
>> [..]
>>>> The unrolled loop is the same amount of work as maintaining @fields.
>>>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>>
>>> AFAICT Dave didn't like this way:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1699527082.git.kai.huang@intel.com/T/#me6f615d7845215c278753b57a0bce1162960209d
>>
>> I agree with Dave that the original was unreadable. However, I also
>> think he glossed over the loss of type-safety and the silliness of
>> defining an array to precisely map fields only to turn around and do a
>> runtime check that the statically defined array was filled out
>> correctly. So I think lets solve the readability problem *and* make the
>> array definition identical in appearance to unrolled type-safe
>> execution, something like (UNTESTED!):
>>
>>
> [...]
> 
>> +/*
>> + * Assumes locally defined @ret and @ts to convey the error code and the
>> + * 'struct tdx_tdmr_sysinfo' instance to fill out
>> + */
>> +#define TD_SYSINFO_MAP(_field_id, _offset)                              \
>> +	({                                                              \
>> +		if (ret == 0)                                           \
>> +			ret = read_sys_metadata_field16(                \
>> +				MD_FIELD_ID_##_field_id, &ts->_offset); \
>> +	})
>> +
> 
> We need to support u16/u32/u64 metadata field sizes, but not just u16.
> 
> E.g.:
> 
> struct tdx_sysinfo_module_info {                                        
>         u32 sys_attributes;                                             
>         u64 tdx_features0;                                              
> };
> 
> has both u32 and u64 in one structure.
> 
> To achieve type-safety for all field sizes, I think we need one helper
> for each field size.  E.g.,
> 
> #define READ_SYSMD_FIELD_FUNC(_size)                            \
> static inline int                                               \
> read_sys_metadata_field##_size(u64 field_id, u##_size *data)    \
> {                                                               \
>         u64 tmp;                                                \
>         int ret;                                                \
>                                                                 \
>         ret = read_sys_metadata_field(field_id, &tmp);          \
>         if (ret)                                                \
>                 return ret;                                     \
>                                                                 \
>         *data = tmp;                                            \
>         return 0;                                               \
> }                                                                       
> 
> /* For now only u16/u32/u64 are needed */
> READ_SYSMD_FIELD_FUNC(16)                                               
> READ_SYSMD_FIELD_FUNC(32)                                               
> READ_SYSMD_FIELD_FUNC(64)                                               
> 
> Is this what you were thinking?
> 
> (Btw, I recall that I tried this before for internal review, but AFAICT
> Dave didn't like this.)
> 
> For the build time check as you replied to the next patch, I agree it's
> better than the runtime warning check as done in the current code.
> 
> If we still use the type-less 'void *stbuf' function to read metadata
> fields for all sizes, then I think we can do below:
> 
> /*
>  * Read one global metadata field and store the data to a location of a 
>  * given buffer specified by the offset and size (in bytes).            
>  */
> static int stbuf_read_sysmd_field(u64 field_id, void *stbuf, int offset,
>                                   int size)                             
> {       
>         void *member = stbuf + offset;                                  
>         u64 tmp;                                                        
>         int ret;                                                        
> 
>         ret = read_sys_metadata_field(field_id, &tmp);                  
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;                                             
>         
>         memcpy(member, &tmp, size);                                     
>         
>         return 0;                                                       
> }                                                                       
> 
> /* Wrapper to read one metadata field to u8/u16/u32/u64 */              
> #define stbuf_read_sysmd_single(_field_id, _pdata)      \
>         stbuf_read_sysmd_field(_field_id, _pdata, 0, 	\
> 		sizeof(typeof(*(_pdata)))) 
> 
> #define CHECK_MD_FIELD_SIZE(_field_id, _st, _member)    \
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(MD_FIELD_ELE_SIZE(MD_FIELD_ID_##_field_id) != \
>                         sizeof(_st->_member))
> 
> #define TD_SYSINFO_MAP_TEST(_field_id, _st, _member)                    \
>         ({                                                              \
>                 if (ret) {                                              \
>                         CHECK_MD_FIELD_SIZE(_field_id, _st, _member);   \
>                         ret = stbuf_read_sysmd_single(                  \
>                                         MD_FIELD_ID_##_field_id,        \
>                                         &_st->_member);                 \
>                 }                                                       \
>          })
> 
> static int get_tdx_module_info(struct tdx_sysinfo_module_info *modinfo)
> {
>         int ret = 0;
> 
> #define TD_SYSINFO_MAP_MOD_INFO(_field_id, _member)     \
>         TD_SYSINFO_MAP_TEST(_field_id, modinfo, _member)
> 
>         TD_SYSINFO_MAP_MOD_INFO(SYS_ATTRIBUTES, sys_attributes);
>         TD_SYSINFO_MAP_MOD_INFO(TDX_FEATURES0,  tdx_features0);
> 
>         return ret;
> }
> 
> With the build time check above, I think it's OK to lose the type-safe
> inside the stbuf_read_sysmd_field(), and the code is simpler IMHO.
> 
> Any comments?

BUILD_BUG_ON() requires a function, but it is still
be possible to add a build time check in TD_SYSINFO_MAP
e.g.

#define TD_SYSINFO_CHECK_SIZE(_field_id, _size)			\
	__builtin_choose_expr(MD_FIELD_ELE_SIZE(_field_id) == _size, _size, (void)0)

#define _TD_SYSINFO_MAP(_field_id, _offset, _size)		\
	{ .field_id = _field_id,				\
	  .offset   = _offset,					\
	  .size	    = TD_SYSINFO_CHECK_SIZE(_field_id, _size) }

#define TD_SYSINFO_MAP(_field_id, _struct, _member)		\
	_TD_SYSINFO_MAP(MD_FIELD_ID_##_field_id,		\
			offsetof(_struct, _member),		\
			sizeof(typeof(((_struct *)0)->_member)))



  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-26 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-17  3:40 [PATCH v2 00/10] TDX host: metadata reading tweaks, bug fix and info dump Kai Huang
2024-07-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] x86/virt/tdx: Rename _offset to _member for TD_SYSINFO_MAP() macro Kai Huang
2024-08-05 22:37   ` Dan Williams
2024-07-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] x86/virt/tdx: Unbind global metadata read with 'struct tdx_tdmr_sysinfo' Kai Huang
2024-08-05 23:32   ` Dan Williams
2024-08-06  0:09     ` Huang, Kai
2024-08-06  1:13       ` Dan Williams
2024-08-07 12:09         ` Huang, Kai
2024-08-26 15:38           ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2024-08-26 22:40             ` Huang, Kai
2024-08-27  4:54               ` Adrian Hunter
2024-08-27  7:22                 ` Huang, Kai
2024-07-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] x86/virt/tdx: Support global metadata read for all element sizes Kai Huang
2024-08-05 23:45   ` Dan Williams
2024-07-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] x86/virt/tdx: Abstract reading multiple global metadata fields as a helper Kai Huang
2024-07-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/virt/tdx: Move field mapping table of getting TDMR info to function local Kai Huang
2024-08-05 23:48   ` Dan Williams
2024-07-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/virt/tdx: Refine a comment to reflect the latest TDX spec Kai Huang
2024-08-06  3:43   ` Dan Williams
2024-08-06 11:23     ` Huang, Kai
2024-08-06 19:06       ` Dan Williams
2024-08-06 21:01         ` Huang, Kai
2024-07-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] x86/virt/tdx: Start to track all global metadata in one structure Kai Huang
2024-08-06  3:51   ` Dan Williams
2024-08-06 11:29     ` Huang, Kai
2024-07-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] x86/virt/tdx: Print TDX module basic information Kai Huang
2024-08-06  4:19   ` Dan Williams
2024-08-06 11:51     ` Huang, Kai
2024-08-06 12:48       ` Huang, Kai
2024-08-07 21:56       ` Dan Williams
2024-08-07 22:32         ` Huang, Kai
2024-08-08 10:31   ` Chenyi Qiang
2024-08-08 23:52     ` Huang, Kai
2024-07-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] x86/virt/tdx: Reduce TDMR's reserved areas by using CMRs to find memory holes Kai Huang
2024-08-06  4:47   ` Dan Williams
2024-08-06 12:17     ` Huang, Kai
2024-08-20 18:38   ` Adrian Hunter
2024-08-27  7:24     ` Huang, Kai
2024-07-17  3:40 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] x86/virt/tdx: Don't initialize module that doesn't support NO_RBP_MOD feature Kai Huang
2024-08-06  4:55   ` Dan Williams
2024-08-06 12:18     ` Huang, Kai
2024-08-05 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] TDX host: metadata reading tweaks, bug fix and info dump Huang, Kai
2024-08-05 22:36 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-08  0:19   ` Huang, Kai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a107b067-861d-43f4-86b5-29271cb93dad@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox