From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] s390x: Load reset psw on diag308 reset
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:42:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a22f8407-efb1-ab0e-eaf6-77d0b853c6de@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7683adc7-2cd0-1103-d231-8a1577f1e673@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4722 bytes --]
On 11/12/19 1:09 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 11.11.19 16:33, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> On a diag308 subcode 0 CRs will be reset, so we need a PSW mask
>> without DAT. Also we need to set the short psw indication to be
>> compliant with the architecture.
>>
>> Let's therefore define a reset PSW mask with 64 bit addressing and
>> short PSW indication that is compliant with architecture and use it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
>> lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 3 ++-
>> s390x/cstart64.S | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
>> index 4b213f8..61d2658 100644
>> --- a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ int main(void)
>> OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPRS, lowcore, sw_int_fprs);
>> OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC, lowcore, sw_int_fpc);
>> OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS, lowcore, sw_int_crs);
>> + OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_PSW, lowcore, sw_int_psw);
>> OFFSET(GEN_LC_MCCK_EXT_SA_ADDR, lowcore, mcck_ext_sa_addr);
>> OFFSET(GEN_LC_FPRS_SA, lowcore, fprs_sa);
>> OFFSET(GEN_LC_GRS_SA, lowcore, grs_sa);
>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>> index 07d4e5e..7d25e4f 100644
>> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>> @@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ struct lowcore {
>> uint32_t sw_int_fpc; /* 0x0300 */
>> uint8_t pad_0x0304[0x0308 - 0x0304]; /* 0x0304 */
>> uint64_t sw_int_crs[16]; /* 0x0308 */
>> - uint8_t pad_0x0310[0x11b0 - 0x0388]; /* 0x0388 */
>> + struct psw sw_int_psw; /* 0x0388 */
>> + uint8_t pad_0x0310[0x11b0 - 0x0390]; /* 0x0390 */
>> uint64_t mcck_ext_sa_addr; /* 0x11b0 */
>> uint8_t pad_0x11b8[0x1200 - 0x11b8]; /* 0x11b8 */
>> uint64_t fprs_sa[16]; /* 0x1200 */
>> diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
>> index 4be20fc..86dd4c4 100644
>> --- a/s390x/cstart64.S
>> +++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
>> @@ -126,13 +126,18 @@ memsetxc:
>> .globl diag308_load_reset
>> diag308_load_reset:
>> SAVE_REGS
>> - /* Save the first PSW word to the IPL PSW */
>> + /* Backup current PSW mask, as we have to restore it on success */
>> epsw %r0, %r1
>> - st %r0, 0
>> - /* Store the address and the bit for 31 bit addressing */
>> - larl %r0, 0f
>> - oilh %r0, 0x8000
>> - st %r0, 0x4
>> + st %r0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_PSW
>> + st %r1, GEN_LC_SW_INT_PSW + 4
>> + /* Load reset psw mask (short psw, 64 bit) */
>> + lg %r0, reset_psw
>> + /* Load the success label address */
>> + larl %r1, 0f
>> + /* Or it to the mask */
>> + ogr %r0, %r1
>> + /* Store it at the reset PSW location (real 0x0) */
>> + stg %r0, 0
>> /* Do the reset */
>> diag %r0,%r2,0x308
>> /* Failure path */
>> @@ -144,7 +149,10 @@ diag308_load_reset:
>> lctlg %c0, %c0, 0(%r1)
>> RESTORE_REGS
>> lhi %r2, 1
>> - br %r14
>> + larl %r0, 1f
>> + stg %r0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_PSW + 8
>> + lpswe GEN_LC_SW_INT_PSW
>> +1: br %r14
>>
>> .globl smp_cpu_setup_state
>> smp_cpu_setup_state:
>> @@ -184,6 +192,8 @@ svc_int:
>> lpswe GEN_LC_SVC_OLD_PSW
>>
>> .align 8
>> +reset_psw:
>> + .quad 0x0008000180000000
>> initial_psw:
>> .quad 0x0000000180000000, clear_bss_start
>> pgm_int_psw:
>>
>
> This patch breaks the smp test under TCG (no clue and no time to look
> into the details :) ):
I forgot to fixup the offset calculation at the top of the patch once
again...
>
> timeout -k 1s --foreground 90s
> /home/dhildenb/git/qemu/s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x -nodefaults
> -nographic -machine s390-ccw-virtio,accel=tcg -chardev stdio,id=con0
> -device sclpconsole,chardev=con0 -kernel s390x/smp.elf -smp 1 -smp 2 #
> -initrd /tmp/tmp.EDi4y0tv58
> SMP: Initializing, found 2 cpus
> PASS: smp: start
> PASS: smp: stop
> FAIL: smp: stop store status: prefix
> PASS: smp: stop store status: stack
> PASS: smp: store status at address: running: incorrect state
> PASS: smp: store status at address: running: status not written
> PASS: smp: store status at address: stopped: status written
> PASS: smp: ecall: ecall
> PASS: smp: emcall: ecall
> PASS: smp: cpu reset: cpu stopped
> PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: psw
> PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: prefix
> PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: fpc
> PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: cpu timer
> PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: todpr
> PASS: smp: reset initial: initialized: cr0 == 0xE0
> PASS: smp: reset initial: initialized: cr14 == 0xC2000000
> PASS: smp: reset initial: cpu stopped
> SUMMARY: 18 tests, 1 unexpected failures
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-12 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-11 15:33 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] s390x: Improve architectural compliance for diag308 Janosch Frank
2019-11-11 15:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/3] s390x: Fix initial cr0 load comments Janosch Frank
2019-11-12 9:25 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-11 15:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/3] s390x: Add CR save area Janosch Frank
2019-11-11 17:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-12 9:41 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-11 15:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] s390x: Load reset psw on diag308 reset Janosch Frank
2019-11-12 9:53 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-12 12:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-12 13:42 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2019-11-12 16:17 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-13 10:04 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-13 10:31 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-13 11:24 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4] " Janosch Frank
2019-11-13 18:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 7:24 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-12 13:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] " Janosch Frank
2019-11-12 12:10 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] s390x: Improve architectural compliance for diag308 David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a22f8407-efb1-ab0e-eaf6-77d0b853c6de@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox