public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: vsie: Check alignment of BSCA header
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 07:47:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a45e260a-ce8e-4145-97ce-1e1cd684f2b8@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107024927.1414253-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>

Am 07.11.25 um 03:49 schrieb Eric Farman:
> The VSIE code currently checks that the BSCA struct fits within
> a page, and returns a validity exception 0x003b if it doesn't.
> The BSCA is pinned in memory rather than shadowed (see block
> comment at end of kvm_s390_cpu_feat_init()), so enforcing the
> CPU entries to be on the same pinned page makes sense.
> 
> Except those entries aren't going to be used below the guest,
> and according to the definition of that validity exception only
> the header of the BSCA (everything but the CPU entries) needs to
> be within a page. Adjust the alignment check to account for that.

Right, we do not yet support sigp interpretion for vsie and the
validity is indeed defined only for bsca header alignment:
---
The SCA header crosses a 4 K-byte boundary
(VIR code 003B hex).

Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>


--- 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> index 347268f89f2f..d23ab5120888 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> @@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ static int pin_blocks(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
>   		else if ((gpa & ~0x1fffUL) == kvm_s390_get_prefix(vcpu))
>   			rc = set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x0011U);
>   		else if ((gpa & PAGE_MASK) !=
> -			 ((gpa + sizeof(struct bsca_block) - 1) & PAGE_MASK))
> +			 ((gpa + offsetof(struct bsca_block, cpu[0]) - 1) & PAGE_MASK))
>   			rc = set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x003bU);
>   		if (!rc) {
>   			rc = pin_guest_page(vcpu->kvm, gpa, &hpa);


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07  2:49 [PATCH] KVM: s390: vsie: Check alignment of BSCA header Eric Farman
2025-11-07  6:47 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2025-11-11  8:51 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-11-11 15:36   ` Eric Farman
2025-11-11 16:24     ` Christoph Schlameuss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a45e260a-ce8e-4145-97ce-1e1cd684f2b8@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox