Re: [RFC PATCH 00/34] Running Qualcomm's Gunyah Guests via KVM in EL1

[Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 03:13:07PM +0100, Karim Manaouil wrote:
> This series introduces the capability of running Gunyah guests via KVM on
> Qualcomm SoCs shipped with Gunyah hypervisor [1] (e.g. RB3 Gen2).
> 
> The goal of this work is to port the existing Gunyah hypervisor support from a
> standalone driver interface [2] to KVM, with the aim of leveraging as much of the
> existing KVM infrastructure as possible to reduce duplication of effort around
> memory management (e.g. guest_memfd), irqfd, and other core components.
> 
> In short, Gunyah is a Type-1 hypervisor, meaning that it runs independently of any
> high-level OS kernel such as Linux and runs in a higher CPU privilege level than VMs.
> Gunyah is shipped as firmware and guests typically talk with Gunyah via hypercalls.
> KVM is designed to run as Type-2 hypervisor. This port allows KVM to run in EL1 and
> serve as the interface for VM lifecycle management,while offloading virtualization
> to Gunyah.

If you're keen on running your own hypervisor then I'm sorry, you get to
deal with it soup to nuts. Other hypervisors (e.g. mshv) have their own
kernel drivers for managing the host / UAPI parts of driving VMs.

The KVM arch interface is *internal* to KVM, not something to be
(ab)used for cramming in a non-KVM hypervisor. KVM and other hypervisors
can still share other bits of truly common infrastructure, like
guest_memfd.

I understand the value in what you're trying to do, but if you want it
to smell like KVM you may as well just let the user run it at EL2.

Thanks,
Oliver