From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
Cc: "Pratik R. Sampat" <prsampat@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, shuah@kernel.org,
pgonda@google.com, nikunj@amd.com, pankaj.gupta@amd.com,
michael.roth@amd.com, sraithal@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] Basic SEV-SNP Selftests
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 17:56:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBleV3TlvA1QwcSZ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34890707-201a-44f9-afb3-b065ae71b246@amd.com>
On Mon, May 05, 2025, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> On 5/5/2025 6:15 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > @@ -3067,12 +3075,6 @@ void __init sev_hardware_setup(void)
> >
> > if (!sev_enabled)
> > return;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Do both SNP and SEV initialization at KVM module load.
> > - */
> > - init_args.probe = true;
> > - sev_platform_init(&init_args);
> > }
> >
> > void sev_hardware_unsetup(void)
> > --
> >
> > Ashish, what am I missing?
> >
>
> As far as setting sev*_enabled is concerned, i believe they are more specific
> to SNP/SEV/SEV-ES being enabled in the system, which is separate from
> SEV_INIT/SNP_INIT (SNP_INIT success indicates that RMP been initialized, SNP
> has to be already enabled via MSR_SYSCFG before SNP_INIT is called), though
> SEV_INIT/SNP_INIT may fail but SEV/SNP support will still be enabled on the
> system.
No, if SNP_INIT fails and has zero chance of succeeding, then SNP is *NOT*
supported *by KVM*. The platform may be configured to support SNP, but that
matters not at all if KVM can't actually use the functionality.
> Additionally as SEV_INIT/SNP_INIT during sev_platform_init() have failed, so
> any SEV/SEV-ES/SNP VM launch will fail as the firmware will return invalid
> platform state as INITs have failed.
Yeah, and that's *awful* behavior for KVM. Imagine if KVM did that for every
feature, i.e. enumerated hardware support irrespective of KVM support.
The API is KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID, not KVM_GET_MOSTLY_SUPPORTED_CPUID.
> >From my understanding, sev*_enabled indicates the user support to
> >enable/disable support for SEV/SEV-ES/SEV-SNP,
Yes, and they're also used to reflect and enumerate KVM support:
if (sev_enabled) {
kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_SEV);
kvm_caps.supported_vm_types |= BIT(KVM_X86_SEV_VM);
}
if (sev_es_enabled) {
kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_SEV_ES);
kvm_caps.supported_vm_types |= BIT(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM);
}
if (sev_snp_enabled) {
kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP);
kvm_caps.supported_vm_types |= BIT(KVM_X86_SNP_VM);
}
> as the sev*_enabled are the KVM module parameters, while sev*_supported
> indicates if platform has that support enabled.
sev*_supported are completely irrelevant. They are function local scratch variables
that exist so that KVM doesn't clobber userspace's inputs while computing what is
fully supported and enabled.
> And before the SEV/SNP init support was moved to KVM from CCP module, doing
> SEV/SNP INIT could fail but that still had KVM detecting SEV/SNP support
> enabled, so this moving SEV/SNP init stuff to KVM module from CCP driver is
> consistent with the previous behavior.
And one of my driving motivations for getting the initialization into KVM was to
fix that previous behavior.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 22:59 [PATCH v8 00/10] Basic SEV-SNP Selftests Pratik R. Sampat
2025-03-05 22:59 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] KVM: SEV: Disable SEV-SNP support on initialization failure Pratik R. Sampat
2025-03-05 22:59 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] KVM: selftests: SEV-SNP test for KVM_SEV_INIT2 Pratik R. Sampat
2025-03-05 22:59 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] KVM: selftests: Add vmgexit helper Pratik R. Sampat
2025-03-06 4:38 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2025-03-05 22:59 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] KVM: selftests: Add SMT control state helper Pratik R. Sampat
2025-03-05 22:59 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] KVM: selftests: Replace assert() with TEST_ASSERT_EQ() Pratik R. Sampat
2025-03-05 22:59 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] KVM: selftests: Introduce SEV VM type check Pratik R. Sampat
2025-03-05 22:59 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] KVM: selftests: Add library support for interacting with SNP Pratik R. Sampat
2025-03-05 22:59 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] KVM: selftests: Force GUEST_MEMFD flag for SNP VM type Pratik R. Sampat
2025-03-05 22:59 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] KVM: selftests: Abstractions for SEV to decouple policy from type Pratik R. Sampat
2025-03-05 23:00 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] KVM: selftests: Add a basic SEV-SNP smoke test Pratik R. Sampat
2025-04-03 18:35 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] Basic SEV-SNP Selftests Pratik R. Sampat
2025-05-02 21:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-05 15:10 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-05-05 23:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-05 23:36 ` Kalra, Ashish
2025-05-06 0:56 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-05-06 17:06 ` Kalra, Ashish
2025-05-06 2:05 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-05-06 13:46 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBleV3TlvA1QwcSZ@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=prsampat@amd.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sraithal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox