public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com,  peterz@infradead.org,
	rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, weijiang.yang@intel.com,
	 john.allen@amd.com, bp@alien8.de, chang.seok.bae@intel.com,
	xin3.li@intel.com,  Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
	 Stanislav Spassov <stanspas@amazon.de>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] x86/fpu: Initialize guest fpstate and FPU pseudo container from guest defaults
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 10:24:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBpFvyITMc0WhlX4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506093740.2864458-6-chao.gao@intel.com>

On Tue, May 06, 2025, Chao Gao wrote:
> fpu_alloc_guest_fpstate() currently uses host defaults to initialize guest
> fpstate and pseudo containers. Guest defaults were introduced to
> differentiate the features and sizes of host and guest FPUs. Switch to
> using guest defaults instead.
> 
> Additionally, incorporate the initialization of indicators (is_valloc and
> is_guest) into the newly added guest-specific reset function to centralize
> the resetting of guest fpstate.
> 
> Suggested-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
> ---
> v6: Drop vcpu_fpu_config.user_* (Rick)
> v5: init is_valloc/is_guest in the guest-specific reset function (Chang)
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> index 444e517a8648..78a9c809dfad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> @@ -211,7 +211,24 @@ void fpu_reset_from_exception_fixup(void)
>  }
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
> -static void __fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd);
> +static void __guest_fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Initialize sizes and feature masks. Supervisor features and
> +	 * sizes may diverge between guest FPUs and host FPUs, whereas
> +	 * user features and sizes remain the same.
> +	 */
> +	fpstate->size		= guest_default_cfg.size;
> +	fpstate->xfeatures	= guest_default_cfg.features;
> +	fpstate->user_size	= fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
> +	fpstate->user_xfeatures	= fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
> +	fpstate->xfd		= xfd;
> +
> +	/* Initialize indicators to reflect properties of the fpstate */
> +	fpstate->is_valloc	= true;
> +	fpstate->is_guest	= true;
> +}
> +

Extra newline.
>  
>  static void fpu_lock_guest_permissions(void)
>  {
> @@ -236,19 +253,18 @@ bool fpu_alloc_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu)
>  	struct fpstate *fpstate;
>  	unsigned int size;
>  
> -	size = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_size + ALIGN(offsetof(struct fpstate, regs), 64);
> +	size = guest_default_cfg.size + ALIGN(offsetof(struct fpstate, regs), 64);
> +
>  	fpstate = vzalloc(size);
>  	if (!fpstate)
>  		return false;
>  
>  	/* Leave xfd to 0 (the reset value defined by spec) */
> -	__fpstate_reset(fpstate, 0);
> +	__guest_fpstate_reset(fpstate, 0);

Given that there is a single caller for each of __fpstate_reset() and
__guest_fpstate_reset(), keeping the helpers does more harm than good IMO.
Passing in '0' and setting xfd in __guest_fpstate_reset() is especially pointless.

E.g.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
index d5f3af2ba758..87d6ee87ff55 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
@@ -212,25 +212,6 @@ void fpu_reset_from_exception_fixup(void)
 }
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
-static void __guest_fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd)
-{
-       /*
-        * Initialize sizes and feature masks. Supervisor features and
-        * sizes may diverge between guest FPUs and host FPUs, whereas
-        * user features and sizes remain the same.
-        */
-       fpstate->size           = guest_default_cfg.size;
-       fpstate->xfeatures      = guest_default_cfg.features;
-       fpstate->user_size      = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
-       fpstate->user_xfeatures = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
-       fpstate->xfd            = xfd;
-
-       /* Initialize indicators to reflect properties of the fpstate */
-       fpstate->is_valloc      = true;
-       fpstate->is_guest       = true;
-}
-
-
 static void fpu_lock_guest_permissions(void)
 {
        struct fpu_state_perm *fpuperm;
@@ -260,8 +241,20 @@ bool fpu_alloc_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu)
        if (!fpstate)
                return false;
 
-       /* Leave xfd to 0 (the reset value defined by spec) */
-       __guest_fpstate_reset(fpstate, 0);
+       /* Initialize indicators to reflect properties of the fpstate */
+       fpstate->is_valloc      = true;
+       fpstate->is_guest       = true;
+
+       /*
+        * Initialize sizes and feature masks. Supervisor features and sizes
+        * may diverge between guest FPUs and host FPUs, whereas user features
+        * and sizes are always identical the same.
+        */
+       fpstate->size           = guest_default_cfg.size;
+       fpstate->xfeatures      = guest_default_cfg.features;
+       fpstate->user_size      = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
+       fpstate->user_xfeatures = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
+
        fpstate_init_user(fpstate);
 
        gfpu->fpstate           = fpstate;
@@ -550,21 +543,17 @@ void fpstate_init_user(struct fpstate *fpstate)
                fpstate_init_fstate(fpstate);
 }
 
-static void __fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd)
-{
-       /* Initialize sizes and feature masks */
-       fpstate->size           = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_size;
-       fpstate->user_size      = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
-       fpstate->xfeatures      = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features;
-       fpstate->user_xfeatures = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
-       fpstate->xfd            = xfd;
-}
-
 void fpstate_reset(struct fpu *fpu)
 {
        /* Set the fpstate pointer to the default fpstate */
        fpu->fpstate = &fpu->__fpstate;
-       __fpstate_reset(fpu->fpstate, init_fpstate.xfd);
+
+       /* Initialize sizes and feature masks */
+       fpu->fpstate->size              = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_size;
+       fpu->fpstate->user_size         = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
+       fpu->fpstate->xfeatures         = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features;
+       fpu->fpstate->user_xfeatures    = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
+       fpu->fpstate->xfd               = init_fpstate.xfd;
 
        /* Initialize the permission related info in fpu */
        fpu->perm.__state_perm          = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features;

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-06 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-06  9:36 [PATCH v6 0/7] Introduce CET supervisor state support Chao Gao
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Always preserve non-user xfeatures/flags in __state_perm Chao Gao
2025-05-06  9:51   ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Sean Christopherson
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] x86/fpu: Drop @perm from guest pseudo FPU container Chao Gao
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Differentiate default features for host and guest FPUs Chao Gao
2025-05-08 20:02   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] x86/fpu: Initialize guest FPU permissions from guest defaults Chao Gao
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] x86/fpu: Initialize guest fpstate and FPU pseudo container " Chao Gao
2025-05-06 17:24   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-05-07  7:37     ` Chao Gao
2025-05-07 18:01       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-07 18:04         ` Dave Hansen
2025-05-09  8:14   ` [PATCH v6a 5/8] " Chao Gao
2025-05-09  8:16   ` [PATCH v6a 6/8] x86/fpu: Remove xfd argument from __fpstate_reset() Chao Gao
2025-05-09 18:29     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce "guest-only" supervisor xfeature set Chao Gao
2025-05-06  9:36 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Add CET supervisor xfeature support as a guest-only feature Chao Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBpFvyITMc0WhlX4@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.allen@amd.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=stanspas@amazon.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox