From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@intel.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, weijiang.yang@intel.com,
john.allen@amd.com, bp@alien8.de, chang.seok.bae@intel.com,
xin3.li@intel.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
Stanislav Spassov <stanspas@amazon.de>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] x86/fpu: Initialize guest fpstate and FPU pseudo container from guest defaults
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 10:24:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBpFvyITMc0WhlX4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506093740.2864458-6-chao.gao@intel.com>
On Tue, May 06, 2025, Chao Gao wrote:
> fpu_alloc_guest_fpstate() currently uses host defaults to initialize guest
> fpstate and pseudo containers. Guest defaults were introduced to
> differentiate the features and sizes of host and guest FPUs. Switch to
> using guest defaults instead.
>
> Additionally, incorporate the initialization of indicators (is_valloc and
> is_guest) into the newly added guest-specific reset function to centralize
> the resetting of guest fpstate.
>
> Suggested-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
> ---
> v6: Drop vcpu_fpu_config.user_* (Rick)
> v5: init is_valloc/is_guest in the guest-specific reset function (Chang)
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> index 444e517a8648..78a9c809dfad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> @@ -211,7 +211,24 @@ void fpu_reset_from_exception_fixup(void)
> }
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
> -static void __fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd);
> +static void __guest_fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Initialize sizes and feature masks. Supervisor features and
> + * sizes may diverge between guest FPUs and host FPUs, whereas
> + * user features and sizes remain the same.
> + */
> + fpstate->size = guest_default_cfg.size;
> + fpstate->xfeatures = guest_default_cfg.features;
> + fpstate->user_size = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
> + fpstate->user_xfeatures = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
> + fpstate->xfd = xfd;
> +
> + /* Initialize indicators to reflect properties of the fpstate */
> + fpstate->is_valloc = true;
> + fpstate->is_guest = true;
> +}
> +
Extra newline.
>
> static void fpu_lock_guest_permissions(void)
> {
> @@ -236,19 +253,18 @@ bool fpu_alloc_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu)
> struct fpstate *fpstate;
> unsigned int size;
>
> - size = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_size + ALIGN(offsetof(struct fpstate, regs), 64);
> + size = guest_default_cfg.size + ALIGN(offsetof(struct fpstate, regs), 64);
> +
> fpstate = vzalloc(size);
> if (!fpstate)
> return false;
>
> /* Leave xfd to 0 (the reset value defined by spec) */
> - __fpstate_reset(fpstate, 0);
> + __guest_fpstate_reset(fpstate, 0);
Given that there is a single caller for each of __fpstate_reset() and
__guest_fpstate_reset(), keeping the helpers does more harm than good IMO.
Passing in '0' and setting xfd in __guest_fpstate_reset() is especially pointless.
E.g.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
index d5f3af2ba758..87d6ee87ff55 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
@@ -212,25 +212,6 @@ void fpu_reset_from_exception_fixup(void)
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
-static void __guest_fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd)
-{
- /*
- * Initialize sizes and feature masks. Supervisor features and
- * sizes may diverge between guest FPUs and host FPUs, whereas
- * user features and sizes remain the same.
- */
- fpstate->size = guest_default_cfg.size;
- fpstate->xfeatures = guest_default_cfg.features;
- fpstate->user_size = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
- fpstate->user_xfeatures = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
- fpstate->xfd = xfd;
-
- /* Initialize indicators to reflect properties of the fpstate */
- fpstate->is_valloc = true;
- fpstate->is_guest = true;
-}
-
-
static void fpu_lock_guest_permissions(void)
{
struct fpu_state_perm *fpuperm;
@@ -260,8 +241,20 @@ bool fpu_alloc_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu)
if (!fpstate)
return false;
- /* Leave xfd to 0 (the reset value defined by spec) */
- __guest_fpstate_reset(fpstate, 0);
+ /* Initialize indicators to reflect properties of the fpstate */
+ fpstate->is_valloc = true;
+ fpstate->is_guest = true;
+
+ /*
+ * Initialize sizes and feature masks. Supervisor features and sizes
+ * may diverge between guest FPUs and host FPUs, whereas user features
+ * and sizes are always identical the same.
+ */
+ fpstate->size = guest_default_cfg.size;
+ fpstate->xfeatures = guest_default_cfg.features;
+ fpstate->user_size = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
+ fpstate->user_xfeatures = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
+
fpstate_init_user(fpstate);
gfpu->fpstate = fpstate;
@@ -550,21 +543,17 @@ void fpstate_init_user(struct fpstate *fpstate)
fpstate_init_fstate(fpstate);
}
-static void __fpstate_reset(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 xfd)
-{
- /* Initialize sizes and feature masks */
- fpstate->size = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_size;
- fpstate->user_size = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
- fpstate->xfeatures = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features;
- fpstate->user_xfeatures = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
- fpstate->xfd = xfd;
-}
-
void fpstate_reset(struct fpu *fpu)
{
/* Set the fpstate pointer to the default fpstate */
fpu->fpstate = &fpu->__fpstate;
- __fpstate_reset(fpu->fpstate, init_fpstate.xfd);
+
+ /* Initialize sizes and feature masks */
+ fpu->fpstate->size = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_size;
+ fpu->fpstate->user_size = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
+ fpu->fpstate->xfeatures = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features;
+ fpu->fpstate->user_xfeatures = fpu_user_cfg.default_features;
+ fpu->fpstate->xfd = init_fpstate.xfd;
/* Initialize the permission related info in fpu */
fpu->perm.__state_perm = fpu_kernel_cfg.default_features;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 9:36 [PATCH v6 0/7] Introduce CET supervisor state support Chao Gao
2025-05-06 9:36 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Always preserve non-user xfeatures/flags in __state_perm Chao Gao
2025-05-06 9:51 ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Sean Christopherson
2025-05-06 9:36 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] x86/fpu: Drop @perm from guest pseudo FPU container Chao Gao
2025-05-06 9:36 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Differentiate default features for host and guest FPUs Chao Gao
2025-05-08 20:02 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-05-06 9:36 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] x86/fpu: Initialize guest FPU permissions from guest defaults Chao Gao
2025-05-06 9:36 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] x86/fpu: Initialize guest fpstate and FPU pseudo container " Chao Gao
2025-05-06 17:24 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-05-07 7:37 ` Chao Gao
2025-05-07 18:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-07 18:04 ` Dave Hansen
2025-05-09 8:14 ` [PATCH v6a 5/8] " Chao Gao
2025-05-09 8:16 ` [PATCH v6a 6/8] x86/fpu: Remove xfd argument from __fpstate_reset() Chao Gao
2025-05-09 18:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-06 9:36 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce "guest-only" supervisor xfeature set Chao Gao
2025-05-06 9:36 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Add CET supervisor xfeature support as a guest-only feature Chao Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBpFvyITMc0WhlX4@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=stanspas@amazon.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox