From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com" <tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Embed direct bits into gpa for KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 14:58:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEp6pDQgbjsfrg2h@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEnqbfih0gE4CDM-@google.com>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 01:43:25PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025, Rick P Edgecombe wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 12:37 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > Ugh, and the whole tdp_mmu_get_root_for_fault() handling is broken.
> > > is_page_fault_stale() only looks at mmu->root.hpa, i.e. could theoretically blow
> > > up if the shared root is somehow valid but the mirror root is not. Probably can't
> > > happen in practice, but it's ugly.
> >
> > We had some discussion on this root valid/invalid pattern:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/d33d00b88707961126a24b19f940de43ba6e6c56.camel@intel.com/
> >
> > It's brittle though.
>
> Hmm, yeah, the is_page_fault_stale() thing is definitely benign, just odd.
Agreed.
> > > Oof, and I've no idea what kvm_tdp_mmu_fast_pf_get_last_sptep() is doing. It
> > > says:
> > >
> > > /* Fast pf is not supported for mirrored roots */
> > >
> > > but I don't see anything that actually enforces that.
> >
> > Functionally, page_fault_can_be_fast() should prevented this with the check of
> > kvm->arch.has_private_mem.
>
> No? I see this:
>
> if (kvm->arch.has_private_mem &&
> fault->is_private != kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, fault->gfn))
> return false;
>
> I.e. a private fault can be fast, so long as the page is already in the correct
> shared vs. private state. I can imagine that it's impossible for TDX to generate
> protection violations, but I think kvm_tdp_mmu_fast_pf_get_last_sptep() could be
> reached with a mirror root if kvm_ad_enabled=false.
>
> if (!fault->present)
> return !kvm_ad_enabled;
For TDX private fault,
-fault->present is always false if !fault->prefetch as its error_code is
PFERR_PRIVATE_ACCESS | PFERR_WRITE_MASK due to exit quilification being
hardcoded to EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_WRITE.
-fault->present is false if fault->prefetch is true as its erro_code is
PFERR_PRIVATE_ACCESS | PFERR_GUEST_FINAL_MASK.
In tdx_bringup(), enable_ept_ad_bits is checked as a prerequisit of TDX, so
kvm_ad_enabled should be true.
So, page_fault_can_be_fast() should always return false for mirror root.
> /*
> * Note, instruction fetches and writes are mutually exclusive, ignore
> * the "exec" flag.
> */
> return fault->write;
>
> > But, yea it's not correct for being readable. The mirror/external concepts
> > only work if they make sense as independent concepts. Otherwise it's just
> > naming obfuscation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-12 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 0:10 [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Embed direct bits into gpa for KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-11 18:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 18:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-06-11 19:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 20:25 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 20:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11 21:16 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-12 7:19 ` Yan Zhao
2025-06-12 18:50 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-13 1:14 ` Yan Zhao
2025-06-12 6:58 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2025-06-11 20:45 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-11 21:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-12 12:20 ` Yan Zhao
2025-06-12 18:40 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-13 0:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-13 16:12 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-12 4:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEp6pDQgbjsfrg2h@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox