From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Add helper to retrieve cached value of user return MSR
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 09:28:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aM2EvzLLmBi5-iQ5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05a018a6997407080b3b7921ba692aa69a720f07.1758166596.git.houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025, Hou Wenlong wrote:
> In the user return MSR support, the cached value is always the hardware
> value of the specific MSR. Therefore, add a helper to retrieve the
> cached value, which can replace the need for RDMSR, for example, to
> allow SEV-ES guests to restore the correct host hardware value without
> using RDMSR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index cb86f3cca3e9..2cbb0f446a9b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -2376,6 +2376,7 @@ int kvm_add_user_return_msr(u32 msr);
> int kvm_find_user_return_msr(u32 msr);
> int kvm_set_user_return_msr(unsigned index, u64 val, u64 mask);
> void kvm_user_return_msr_update_cache(unsigned int index, u64 val);
> +u64 kvm_get_user_return_msr_cache(unsigned int index);
s/index/slot (the existing helpers need to be changed). The user_return APIs
deliberately use "slot" to try and make it more obvious that they take the slot
within the array, not the index of the MSR.
> static inline bool kvm_is_supported_user_return_msr(u32 msr)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 6d85fbafc679..88d26c86c3b2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -675,6 +675,14 @@ void kvm_user_return_msr_update_cache(unsigned int slot, u64 value)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_user_return_msr_update_cache);
>
> +u64 kvm_get_user_return_msr_cache(unsigned int slot)
I vote to drop "cache". I don't love the existing kvm_user_return_msr_update_cache()
name (or implementation). I would much rather that code be (I'll post a separate
patch) the below, to capture that the "cache" version is performing a subest of
the kvm_set_user_return_msr().
void __kvm_set_user_return_msr(unsigned int slot, u64 value)
{
struct kvm_user_return_msrs *msrs = this_cpu_ptr(user_return_msrs);
msrs->values[slot].curr = value;
kvm_user_return_register_notifier(msrs);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_set_user_return_msr);
int kvm_set_user_return_msr(unsigned slot, u64 value, u64 mask)
{
struct kvm_user_return_msrs *msrs = this_cpu_ptr(user_return_msrs);
int err;
value = (value & mask) | (msrs->values[slot].host & ~mask);
if (value == msrs->values[slot].curr)
return 0;
err = wrmsrq_safe(kvm_uret_msrs_list[slot], value);
if (err)
return 1;
__kvm_set_user_return_msr(slot, value);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_user_return_msr);
> +{
> + struct kvm_user_return_msrs *msrs = this_cpu_ptr(user_return_msrs);
> +
> + return msrs->values[slot].curr;
This can be a one-liner. How about this?
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 17772513b9cc..14236006266b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -2376,6 +2376,7 @@ int kvm_add_user_return_msr(u32 msr);
int kvm_find_user_return_msr(u32 msr);
int kvm_set_user_return_msr(unsigned index, u64 val, u64 mask);
void kvm_user_return_msr_update_cache(unsigned int index, u64 val);
+u64 kvm_get_user_return_msr(unsigned int slot);
static inline bool kvm_is_supported_user_return_msr(u32 msr)
{
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index e07936efacd4..801bf6172a21 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -675,6 +675,12 @@ void kvm_user_return_msr_update_cache(unsigned int slot, u64 value)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_user_return_msr_update_cache);
+u64 kvm_get_user_return_msr(unsigned int slot)
+{
+ return this_cpu_ptr(user_return_msrs)->values[slot].curr;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_get_user_return_msr);
+
static void drop_user_return_notifiers(void)
{
struct kvm_user_return_msrs *msrs = this_cpu_ptr(user_return_msrs);
base-commit: c8fbf7ceb2ae3f64b0c377c8c21f6df577a13eb4
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-19 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-18 3:38 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Add helper to retrieve cached value of user return MSR Hou Wenlong
2025-09-18 3:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: SVM: Use cached value as restore value of TSC_AUX for SEV-ES guest Hou Wenlong
2025-09-18 18:47 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-09-19 13:15 ` Hou Wenlong
2025-09-19 16:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 16:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 16:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-20 6:52 ` Hou Wenlong
2025-09-19 16:28 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aM2EvzLLmBi5-iQ5@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox