From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f201.google.com (mail-pf1-f201.google.com [209.85.210.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A52B350824 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 15:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757432066; cv=none; b=eajpwJOZ8bhHZTESxFQk9TdKcXFb6pakdHtrWdf22cQ97mJXxoWHyZWq7JkcjSbyyzOOo+2FI3sx91KVmPXg8HPhX8g4cxJ291rwgcY0GoLMw8boE50STc3xiz5zQsv8vy+LiB0EkDZAJegMNmBh77Cznjz7lMRJyDn2NjEoLfQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757432066; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yn2bOh0B0Zx3GkzFvepDHj8pJ2ij4Q0s3nI3qDvTNYI=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=YAWJZaPhUQ9t16F++UPKWs+DuLEShJTm4CF7DDIYLKChYbsr6W1rQ0rHaDs6xXrOrI8H8CtIti5/+k/ypQtLxLZVmkltqWGQmvcJZO1TNyHKFcDa+YRYn9B/1gq7J1WAGJx0NBn4Ili/6rh3uKbL6L7axhBB82maBYuafOzCC4c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=MUaN4oAc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="MUaN4oAc" Received: by mail-pf1-f201.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7724487d2a8so11523844b3a.1 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:34:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1757432064; x=1758036864; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KiRBBw+bFoLEBffFJrRthdXKHEiu9VDNF3NlsubTtkQ=; b=MUaN4oAcpMz25eFJC7RUXz52xJEf8onsp+L5U6VOq4o+ouxlzzSTvLYNn3lMroB6QS THqAuYDcgzTaXgEKjVyPES1FoQ2HJVKTiCBm20qhbIH3sVyzgxUPX6qpelEGjOWd61Pa pJPElCoAe4Yl8WFR+BHTpNUQhN2/mknIbiCd0JLN9WORgzczZTWALiC0oyzCZQ1MNoSQ 7GIMmuUuuoFUxNQiUZCsfseVSMD7MWo8CKgfMB+YB9dRNA5RU2l4Mku8bxrwDbDv7iBz 1j37CBY4/9ZrXbkZPZkL99cE5GW2PFnK5fsQ5yWZKF5f43OYcQDrEydk8MbUxD+aAVEO 4r8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757432064; x=1758036864; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KiRBBw+bFoLEBffFJrRthdXKHEiu9VDNF3NlsubTtkQ=; b=vjPW9HdK3GBNdvA1GquM15iKaVbRsWa5XBXdZdrOTswqq1IXxWr6HMnrSacasZ8Wb2 cZFEkKF7wr4jJGvelyV2KcrPZ78Tb5c0j8z8uP/9hdSB/BmWWdyLPNSKx/Lro/ysfniN mc0pzMzIVQTYdDMaWNmhn4dnbW/fDykrZxllxXP4Ydb1AB9+Bd5jn9R+J0s/VcIsFNEn 6rWxkdRxGw9hCEDhHREJwqswAH1GzbfwnMJLOa7lpzYnsVd/bLQkHT/k2IyJnOtB0+7u an/GkauEg6AF7r/m7xJyehhDrp34DaIiJF21yFActOXUB+NhHBvCcY/1uOE+EbhvZI4S x/0A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUyzZJWE3E9+Af9vFInI0Cyq4ETB/6SFhuosBsvPjv5MflwbLRG4BUv0PCi8LGGtG0kBAM=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzbBhIE5LhUXDHlXT6p2ay2ty525ZbyHPRcJezXOs4LY49VJqOq lEsUsznPLVeoGjF7c4wZ7HehAuJ0nrlZr+HX5MddYzh/3PtE6CVXqb3HTmHWEnrkRt1nSa2WLNO uKC/i+w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG8H/3KOfeazj5iJ04jjkBz6yIE/AOKQMDfJnt9yz4+nKfKTamhvfczManAY+AMloz39ZjJ5n1zY58= X-Received: from pfbna26.prod.google.com ([2002:a05:6a00:3e1a:b0:770:4b49:a1ea]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a05:6a00:2d1d:b0:772:44e8:ce65 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7742df243damr18055484b3a.32.1757432064361; Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 08:34:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] KVM: SVM: Fix IRQ window inhibit handling From: Sean Christopherson To: Naveen N Rao Cc: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxim Levitsky , Vasant Hegde , Suravee Suthikulpanit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tue, Sep 09, 2025, Naveen N Rao wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 12:13:33PM +0530, Naveen N Rao (AMD) wrote: > > Sean, Paolo, > > I have attempted to take the changes discussed in the below thread and > > to convert them into a patch series: > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/Z6JoInXNntIoHLQ8@google.com > > > > I have tried to describe the changes, but the nested aspects would > > definitely need a review to ensure correctness and that all aspects are > > covered there. > > > > None of these patches include patch tags since none were provided in the > > discussion. I have proposed patch trailers on the individual patches. > > Please take a look and let me know if that's fine. > > > > I tested this lightly with nested guests as well and it is working fine > > for me. > > Sean, Paolo, > Any feedback on this - can you please take a look? I'm getting there, slowly. Lot's of time sensitive things in flight right now both internally and upstream. Sorry.