From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Naveen N Rao (AMD)" <naveen@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>,
Alejandro Jimenez <alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: SVM: Enable AVIC by default on Zen 4+
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 16:23:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMif1bI7dCUUBK4Z@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1756993734.git.naveen@kernel.org>
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025, Naveen N Rao (AMD) wrote:
> This is v2 of the RFC posted here:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250626145122.2228258-1-naveen@kernel.org
>
> I have split up the patches and incorporated feedback on the RFC. This
> still depends on at least two other fixes:
> - Reducing SVM IRQ Window inhibit lock contention:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1752819570.git.naveen@kernel.org
Eh, I don't think this one in is a hard dependency. Don't get me wrong, I want
to land that series, ideally at the same time that AVIC is (conditionally) enabled
by default, but I won't lose sleep if it lands a kernel or two later (tagged for
stable@ as appropriate).
Practically speaking, no feature the size of AVIC will ever be perfect. At this
point, I'm comfortable enabling AVIC by default and fixing-forward any remaining
issues. And I want to get AVIC enabled by default in 6.18 because I think that
enabling AVIC in an LTS will be a big net positive for the overall KVM community.
E.g. we'll likely get more exposure/coverage when distros/companies move to the
next LTS, it'll be easier to manage LTS backports for downstream frankenkernels,
etc.
> - Fixing TPR handling when AVIC is active:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1756139678.git.maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com
This is queued for 6.17, just need to send the "thank you" and the PULL request.
As for this series, I'll post a v3 as time is running short for 6.18 (one of those
situations where describing the changes I'm suggesting would take longer than just
making the changes :-/).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 18:00 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: SVM: Enable AVIC by default on Zen 4+ Naveen N Rao (AMD)
2025-09-04 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: SVM: Stop warning if x2AVIC feature bit alone is enabled Naveen N Rao (AMD)
2025-09-15 20:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-16 7:14 ` Naveen N Rao
2025-09-16 13:40 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-09-16 13:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-16 18:37 ` Naveen N Rao
2025-09-16 19:26 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-09-17 0:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-04 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: SVM: Simplify the message printed with 'force_avic' Naveen N Rao (AMD)
2025-09-15 22:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-04 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: SVM: Move all AVIC setup to avic_hardware_setup() Naveen N Rao (AMD)
2025-09-15 19:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-04 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: SVM: Move 'force_avic' module parameter to svm.c Naveen N Rao (AMD)
2025-09-15 22:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-04 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: SVM: Enable AVIC by default from Zen 4 Naveen N Rao (AMD)
2025-09-15 22:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-16 7:39 ` Naveen N Rao
2025-09-16 14:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-16 18:53 ` Naveen N Rao
2025-09-15 23:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-16 10:17 ` Naveen N Rao
2025-09-15 23:23 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-09-16 10:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: SVM: Enable AVIC by default on Zen 4+ Naveen N Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMif1bI7dCUUBK4Z@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox