From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-183.mta0.migadu.com (out-183.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF80230CB2B for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 19:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.183 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758139108; cv=none; b=pnM1EGnFLOWQ+62eyyx77bKFwoMYsLnPTfE+v0ra1KLf+vWiqbuI4I5TnjezazRrfUbCs8Id1HRPzWRPqrWTUXEYYChVUf07DNqKeqs4z7V/E+xgFHFDoaAN/DrZndEREWFRyYTy0vCfhU93Edah3TR+bYI5cE2lNbmZOwvCyiw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758139108; c=relaxed/simple; bh=++K/PDu6ONEBVfix9bUP26opRV7k3zTICh/JJM19N6c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QTgDzyhen9EpTMrRqcNQQ0GbeSfGJe8HqF4HARr4y7Iq1xvjem207lHx4molzS6729bn3BXs6sbLObScKBDM4J7OOlGsaz3q6rcKrKaRJHvsxDT8trpa33NjpywHvRM/dyYlxbKSejBpDXAplArfe/DrQNBZuY25PANfMeBdOpk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=dgSwnH+4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.183 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="dgSwnH+4" Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 12:58:07 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1758139094; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=axLM7SM1M1gPLHiJS2eIg7jyFvifPlO5uWh3xMQYZJo=; b=dgSwnH+4+f66Ikzk19q0rR8cQttfhSzJBLlDvZVLXoIeeIYeyUrkcu6d0szkPvlao4PIIH T4ziSwS062uU2fW0RG+BF4CPQC05hTjfFywCMS5aCLAabZ7z+U26nouF+8Zk9ay2nIJit3 DdUFC2UC4FyQ0BbtOpjEcfOILkuhTeg= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 changes for 6.17, round #3 Message-ID: References: <6e598aec-f55c-467a-abef-6d183bb9cfca@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6e598aec-f55c-467a-abef-6d183bb9cfca@redhat.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 07:56:15PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 9/10/25 22:25, Oliver Upton wrote: > > Hi Paolo, > > > > This is most likely the final set of KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.17. > > > > Of note, I reverted a couple of fixes we took in 6.17 for RCU stalls when > > destroying a stage-2 page table. There appears to be some nasty refcounting / > > UAF issues lurking in those patches and the band-aid we tried to apply didn't > > hold. > > Thanks for pointing this out, I will put a note about reverts in my own tag. Appreciated, seems to have been an unintentional omission from my own tag. Best, Oliver