Re: [TECH TOPIC] vfio, iommufd: Enabling user space drivers to vend more granular access to client processes

[Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 07:57:39PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 02:44:07PM -0700, Alex Mastro wrote:
> 
> > We anticipate a growing need to provide more granular access to device resources
> > beyond what the kernel currently affords to user space drivers similar to our
> > model.
> 
> I'm having a somewhat hard time wrapping my head around the security
> model that says your trust your related processes not use DMA in a way
> that is hostile their peers, but you don't trust them not to issue
> hostile ioctls..

I read this as more about having the granularity to automatically
release resources associated with a client process when it dies (as
mentioned below) rather than relying on the bootstrapping process to
manage it all. Not really about hostile ioctls, but that an ungraceful
ending of some client workload doesn't even send them.
 
> > - It would be nice if mappings created with the restricted IOMMU fd were
> >   automatically freed when the underlying kernel object was freed (if the client
> >   process were to exit ungracefully without explicitly performing unmap cleanup
> >   after itself).
> 
> Maybe the BPF could trigger an eventfd or something when the FD closes?

I wouldn't have considered a BPF dependency for this. I'll need to think
about that one for a moment.