From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, helgaas@kernel.org, clg@redhat.com,
schnelle@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 21:26:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOQX6ZTMvekd6gWy@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0818c13-8075-4db0-b76f-3c9b10516e7a@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 10:54:51AM -0700, Farhan Ali wrote:
> On 10/4/2025 7:54 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > I believe this also makes patch [01/10] in your series unnecessary.
>
> I tested your patches + patches 2-10 of this series. It unfortunately didn't
> completely help with the s390x use case. We still need the check to in
> pci_save_state() from this patch to make sure we are not saving error
> values, which can be written back to the device in pci_restore_state().
What's the caller of pci_save_state() that needs this?
Can you move the check for PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR() to the caller?
I think plenty of other callers don't need this, so it adds
extra overhead for them and down the road it'll be difficult
to untangle which caller needs it and which doesn't.
> As part of the error recovery userspace can use the VFIO_DEVICE_RESET to
> reset the device (pci_try_reset_function()). The function call for this is:
>
> pci_dev_save_and_disable <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17.1/C/ident/pci_dev_save_and_disable>();
>
> __pci_reset_function_locked <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17.1/C/ident/__pci_reset_function_locked>();
>
> pci_dev_restore
> <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17.1/C/ident/pci_dev_restore>();
>
> So we can end up overwriting the initial saved state (added by you in
> pci_bus_add_device()). Do we need to update the pci_dev_save_and_disable()
> not to save the state?
The state saved on device addition is just the initial state and
it is fine if later on it gets updated (which is a nicer term than
"overwritten"). E.g. when portdrv.c instantiates port services
and drivers are bound to them, various registers in Config Space
are changed, hence pcie_portdrv_probe() calls pci_save_state()
again.
However we can discuss whether pci_save_state() is still needed
in pci_dev_save_and_disable().
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-06 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 17:16 [PATCH v4 00/10] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 15:15 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 17:12 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-02 9:16 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-04 14:54 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-06 17:54 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-06 19:26 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2025-10-06 21:35 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-08 13:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-08 17:56 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-08 18:14 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-08 21:55 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-09 4:52 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-09 17:02 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-12 6:43 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-09 9:12 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-12 6:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-14 12:07 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-16 21:00 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-19 14:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 8:59 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-11-22 10:58 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] PCI: Add additional checks for flr reset Farhan Ali
2025-09-30 10:03 ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-30 17:04 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 8:33 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 14:37 ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 14:34 ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] s390/pci: Add architecture specific resource/bus address translation Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 10:54 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-01 16:04 ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 18:01 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-02 12:58 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-02 17:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-02 17:16 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-02 18:14 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] s390/pci: Restore IRQ unconditionally for the zPCI device Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] s390/pci: Update the logic for detecting passthrough device Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] s390/pci: Store PCI error information for passthrough devices Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 14:28 ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-25 16:29 ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] vfio-pci/zdev: Add a device feature for error information Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 8:04 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] vfio: Add a reset_done callback for vfio-pci driver Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] vfio: Remove the pcie check for VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX Farhan Ali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aOQX6ZTMvekd6gWy@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox