public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Josh Hilke <jrhilke@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] vfio: selftests: Prefix logs with device BDF where relevant
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:28:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRIu49aeGUS3OJS7@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJHc60zH4x98uCDEveGf3Lr+b0RaiBUC+r9ZdwpNxu9wTAPptQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2025-11-10 10:24 AM, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 4:56 AM David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> wrote:
> > +#define dev_info(_dev, _fmt, ...) printf("%s: " _fmt, (_dev)->bdf, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +#define dev_err(_dev, _fmt, ...) fprintf(stderr, "%s: " _fmt, (_dev)->bdf, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +
> nit: For all the dev_info() replacements in this patch, the messages
> sound like something went bad/wrong. Shouldn't they be dev_err()
> instead, or were you just aiming for a 1:1 conversion?

Yeah I just wanted to do a 1:1 conversion in this patch:

  printf(...) -> dev_info(...)
  fprintf(stderr, ...) -> dev_err(...)

I can upgrade them in a separate patch in v2.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-10 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-08 23:25 [PATCH 00/12] vfio: selftests: Support for multi-device tests David Matlack
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 01/12] vfio: selftests: Split run.sh into separate scripts David Matlack
2025-11-10  3:21   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-11-10 18:19     ` David Matlack
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 02/12] vfio: selftests: Allow passing multiple BDFs on the command line David Matlack
2025-11-10  3:45   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-11-10 18:31     ` David Matlack
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 03/12] vfio: selftests: Rename struct vfio_iommu_mode to iommu_mode David Matlack
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 04/12] vfio: selftests: Introduce struct iommu David Matlack
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 05/12] vfio: selftests: Support multiple devices in the same container/iommufd David Matlack
2025-10-27 16:21   ` David Matlack
2025-11-07  3:37     ` Josh Hilke
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 06/12] vfio: selftests: Eliminate overly chatty logging David Matlack
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 07/12] vfio: selftests: Prefix logs with device BDF where relevant David Matlack
2025-11-10  4:54   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-11-10 18:28     ` David Matlack [this message]
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 08/12] vfio: selftests: Rename struct vfio_dma_region to dma_region David Matlack
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 09/12] vfio: selftests: Move iommu_*() functions into iommu.c David Matlack
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 10/12] vfio: selftests: Rename vfio_util.h to libvfio.h David Matlack
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 11/12] vfio: selftests: Split libvfio.h into separate header files David Matlack
2025-10-08 23:25 ` [PATCH 12/12] vfio: selftests: Add vfio_pci_device_init_perf_test David Matlack
2025-10-16 16:12   ` David Matlack
2025-11-05 19:06 ` [PATCH 00/12] vfio: selftests: Support for multi-device tests Alex Williamson
2025-11-05 21:03   ` David Matlack
2025-11-05 21:54     ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aRIu49aeGUS3OJS7@google.com \
    --to=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jrhilke@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=vipinsh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox