public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Mastro <amastro@fb.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] vfio: selftests: update DMA mapping tests to use queried IOVA ranges
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:49:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aROFMS+Di8geIqOy@devgpu015.cco6.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRN1MKrfm9GQZpzI@google.com>

On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 05:41:04PM +0000, David Matlack wrote:
> On 2025-11-11 06:52 AM, Alex Mastro wrote:
> > Not all IOMMUs support the same virtual address width as the processor,
> > for instance older Intel consumer platforms only support 39-bits of
> > IOMMU address space.  On such platforms, using the virtual address as
> > the IOVA and mappings at the top of the address space both fail.
> > 
> > VFIO and IOMMUFD have facilities for retrieving valid IOVA ranges,
> > VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_IOVA_RANGE and IOMMU_IOAS_IOVA_RANGES,
> > respectively.  These provide compatible arrays of ranges from which
> > we can construct a simple allocator and record the maximum supported
> > IOVA address.
> > 
> > Use this new allocator in place of reusing the virtual address, and
> > incorporate the maximum supported IOVA into the limit testing.  This
> > latter change doesn't test quite the same absolute end-of-address space
> > behavior but still seems to have some value.  Testing for overflow is
> > skipped when a reduced address space is supported as the desired errno
> > is not generated.
> > 
> > This series is based on Alex Williamson's "Incorporate IOVA range info"
> > [1] along with feedback from the discussion in David Matlack's "Skip
> > vfio_dma_map_limit_test if mapping returns -EINVAL" [2].
> > 
> > Given David's plans to split IOMMU concerns from devices as described in
> > [3], this series' home for `struct iova_allocator` and IOVA
> > range helpers are likely to be short lived, since they reside in
> > vfio_pci_device.c. I assume that the rework can move this functionality
> > to a more appropriate location next to other IOMMU-focused code, once
> > such a place exists.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251108212954.26477-1-alex@shazbot.org/#t
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251107222058.2009244-1-dmatlack@google.com/
> > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aRIoKJk0uwLD-yGr@google.com/
> > 
> > To: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
> > To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> > To: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
> > To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> > Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Mastro <amastro@fb.com>
> 
> LGTM. And I confirmed this fixes vfio_dma_mapping_test on HW that does
> not support IOVA 0xffffffffffffffff. Thanks!
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> Tested-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>

Thanks David!

      reply	other threads:[~2025-11-11 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-11 14:52 [PATCH v2 0/4] vfio: selftests: update DMA mapping tests to use queried IOVA ranges Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] vfio: selftests: add iova range query helpers Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 17:09   ` Alex Williamson
2025-11-11 17:35     ` Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 17:52       ` Alex Williamson
2025-11-11 17:59         ` Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] vfio: selftests: fix map limit tests to use last available iova Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] vfio: selftests: add iova allocator Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] vfio: selftests: replace iova=vaddr with allocated iovas Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 17:09   ` Alex Williamson
2025-11-11 17:21     ` Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 17:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] vfio: selftests: update DMA mapping tests to use queried IOVA ranges Alex Williamson
2025-11-11 17:41 ` David Matlack
2025-11-11 18:49   ` Alex Mastro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aROFMS+Di8geIqOy@devgpu015.cco6.facebook.com \
    --to=amastro@fb.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox