From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9B8729C351 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 11:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765451894; cv=none; b=bc0YHcqZwm8Vyq4KCXmHIA8d+l3ZdLoduRpLT/dkfIKkKjxk1g5eYyBBB5sfyBXYtJ40PULeM93uXI13lAMSi9osq25pe+ePHlPXV65FiMcY5V8t/5jzcOt8882OPiywJatpdPxGPysV2QxRnmdrywg2waJLNKwSNo5Vct7X8TA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765451894; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/PavwmTPXgf2RFgfCgkbjsWUgrq8AQllM7S/czmU9N0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kI2fnWkfq0KE0aSLkDuZztmlXpWJLKwErsRFv2GZeg5STu/+zJraSKJlh/icG3I1SJ3wd/koxS2xXiH+8nLlsqaGBrK3g8vysckPvC+fhcDsQGWJCeuLebPqk6UShH3qvO3D1fZgXiL0DOj/iBxJk3vCzHOvNBhlxSgi8MmUN9E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=N1Q/dmBI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="N1Q/dmBI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1765451893; x=1796987893; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=/PavwmTPXgf2RFgfCgkbjsWUgrq8AQllM7S/czmU9N0=; b=N1Q/dmBIlx/VApiCXEFj2K3rLJ3CnTHSHPk5dMXcDw5TUrF6uOrRYZju 9+Wd/D+9XXmvEyAyp/DkRjhJX4/tX6zzblICCxnFvMlW/Riu5p4JmOK32 q/4RQZp4RiqWGtZq/KpQHfVUx+Kz8hVz5pe3XE1OcOUtDf+0Qeu4C/N8l c6L7phRtzkyJnj6tj7g+/NruKaJZyp1zFOVjPg1OL2JvHI2W10b57xlzv VCHtwrAKSU70ytzzQG4pFVK1DCrqB/Tit0wLGZxw6S4Fawik+ZrQhZk6w lSdGSboxMY5Ps6ksI7tPoOmf3/E6OYt/OSFwjVOITZlNAcVVCkEkSHq4C g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bXH4foZmQG+Gr8qxM5/F8w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4c1cIsa9RV+GhUt6hahJkQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11638"; a="78135215" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,265,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="78135215" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Dec 2025 03:18:12 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: n7oOztxsS0C0JqrUfAh9tQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: yNbwLSB4TqaHeCzHM6soxQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,265,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="196384546" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.160.39]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Dec 2025 03:18:10 -0800 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 19:42:56 +0800 From: Zhao Liu To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Peter Xu , Fabiano Rosas , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Chang S . Bae" , Zide Chen , Xudong Hao Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] i386/cpu: Support APX for KVM Message-ID: References: <20251211070942.3612547-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> <16e0fc49-0cdf-4e54-b692-5f58e18c747b@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > No problem, I have done a quick pass with "sed" on the patches and reapplied > them. I do ask you to respin the Diamond Rapids series though, on top of > the for-upstream tag of https://gitlab.com/bonzini/qemu (currently going > through CI). > > Applied for 11.0! Thank you! BTW, could you please have a look at this clean up on outdated SPR comments: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20251118080837.837505-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com/ I feel it's better to clear SPR comments before DMR touches AMX. Thanks, Zhao