From: Alex Mastro <amastro@fb.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] vfio: selftests: Align BAR mmaps for efficient IOMMU mapping
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:44:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWfkC4figrTo5kIS@devgpu015.cco6.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aWfSnNIF-3xDQr4A@google.com>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 05:30:04PM +0000, David Matlack wrote:
> On 2026-01-13 03:08 PM, Alex Mastro wrote:
> > Update vfio_pci_bar_map() to align BAR mmaps for efficient huge page
> > mappings. The manual mmap alignment can be removed once mmap(!MAP_FIXED)
> > on vfio device fds improves to automatically return well-aligned
> > addresses.
>
> Please also mention that you added MADV_HUGEPAGE and why, and that you
> dropped MAP_FILE (just mention that it was unnecessary in the first
> place).
Ack
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Mastro <amastro@fb.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio.h | 9 ++++++++
> > tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/libvfio.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio.h
> > index 279ddcd70194..5ebf8503586e 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/include/libvfio.h
> > @@ -23,4 +23,13 @@
> > const char *vfio_selftests_get_bdf(int *argc, char *argv[]);
> > char **vfio_selftests_get_bdfs(int *argc, char *argv[], int *nr_bdfs);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Reserve virtual address space of size at an address satisfying
> > + * (vaddr % align) == offset.
> > + *
> > + * Returns the reserved vaddr. The caller is responsible for unmapping
> > + * the returned region.
> > + */
> > +void *mmap_aligned(size_t size, size_t align, size_t offset);
>
> nit: Perhaps we should name this mmap_reserve()? The current name
> implies something is being mmap'ed.
SGTM
>
> > +
> > #endif /* SELFTESTS_VFIO_LIB_INCLUDE_LIBVFIO_H */
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/libvfio.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/libvfio.c
> > index a23a3cc5be69..4529bb1e69d1 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/libvfio.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/libvfio.c
> > @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
> >
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <stdlib.h>
> > +#include <sys/mman.h>
> > +
> > +#include <linux/align.h>
> >
> > #include "../../../kselftest.h"
> > #include <libvfio.h>
> > @@ -76,3 +79,25 @@ const char *vfio_selftests_get_bdf(int *argc, char *argv[])
> >
> > return vfio_selftests_get_bdfs(argc, argv, &nr_bdfs)[0];
> > }
> > +
> > +void *mmap_aligned(size_t size, size_t align, size_t offset)
> > +{
> > + void *map_base, *map_align;
> > + size_t delta;
> > +
> > + VFIO_ASSERT_GT(align, offset);
> > + delta = align - offset;
> > +
> > + map_base = mmap(NULL, size + align, PROT_NONE,
> > + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> > + VFIO_ASSERT_NE(map_base, MAP_FAILED);
> > +
> > + map_align = (void *)(ALIGN((uintptr_t)map_base + delta, align) - delta);
> > +
> > + if (map_align > map_base)
> > + VFIO_ASSERT_EQ(munmap(map_base, map_align - map_base), 0);
> > +
> > + VFIO_ASSERT_EQ(munmap(map_align + size, map_base + align - map_align), 0);
> > +
> > + return map_align;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> > index 13fdb4b0b10f..03f35011b5f7 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/vfio_pci_device.c
> > @@ -12,10 +12,14 @@
> > #include <sys/mman.h>
> >
> > #include <uapi/linux/types.h>
> > +#include <linux/align.h>
> > #include <linux/iommufd.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/limits.h>
> > +#include <linux/log2.h>
> > #include <linux/mman.h>
> > #include <linux/overflow.h>
> > +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/vfio.h>
> >
> > @@ -124,20 +128,38 @@ static void vfio_pci_region_get(struct vfio_pci_device *device, int index,
> > static void vfio_pci_bar_map(struct vfio_pci_device *device, int index)
> > {
> > struct vfio_pci_bar *bar = &device->bars[index];
> > + size_t align, size;
> > + void *vaddr;
> > int prot = 0;
>
> uber-nit: Put vaddr after prot to preserve the reverse-fir-tree ordering
> of variables.
>
> Here's the tip tree documentation:
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-tip.html#variable-declarations
>
> I should probably document somewhere that this is preferred in VFIO
> selftests as well.
Ah, thanks. I usually try to do this but missed it here.
>
> >
> > VFIO_ASSERT_LT(index, PCI_STD_NUM_BARS);
> > VFIO_ASSERT_NULL(bar->vaddr);
> > VFIO_ASSERT_TRUE(bar->info.flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_MMAP);
> > + VFIO_ASSERT_TRUE(is_power_of_2(bar->info.size));
> >
> > if (bar->info.flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_READ)
> > prot |= PROT_READ;
> > if (bar->info.flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE)
> > prot |= PROT_WRITE;
> >
> > - bar->vaddr = mmap(NULL, bar->info.size, prot, MAP_FILE | MAP_SHARED,
> > + size = bar->info.size;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Align BAR mmaps to improve page fault granularity during potential
> > + * subsequent IOMMU mapping of these BAR vaddr. 1G for x86 is the
> > + * largest hugepage size across any architecture, so no benefit from
> > + * larger alignment. BARs smaller than 1G will be aligned by their
> > + * power-of-two size, guaranteeing sufficient alignment for smaller
> > + * hugepages, if present.
> > + */
> > + align = min_t(size_t, size, SZ_1G);
> > +
> > + vaddr = mmap_aligned(size, align, 0);
> > + bar->vaddr = mmap(vaddr, size, prot, MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED,
> > device->fd, bar->info.offset);
> > VFIO_ASSERT_NE(bar->vaddr, MAP_FAILED);
> > +
> > + madvise(bar->vaddr, size, MADV_HUGEPAGE);
> > }
> >
> > static void vfio_pci_bar_unmap(struct vfio_pci_device *device, int index)
> >
> > --
> > 2.47.3
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-13 23:08 [PATCH v2 0/3] vfio: selftests: Add MMIO DMA mapping test Alex Mastro
2026-01-13 23:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] vfio: selftests: Centralize IOMMU mode name definitions Alex Mastro
2026-01-13 23:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] vfio: selftests: Align BAR mmaps for efficient IOMMU mapping Alex Mastro
2026-01-14 17:30 ` David Matlack
2026-01-14 18:44 ` Alex Mastro [this message]
2026-01-13 23:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] vfio: selftests: Add vfio_dma_mapping_mmio_test Alex Mastro
2026-01-14 17:52 ` David Matlack
2026-01-14 18:45 ` Alex Mastro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWfkC4figrTo5kIS@devgpu015.cco6.facebook.com \
--to=amastro@fb.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox