public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: David Sauerwein <dssauerw@amazon.de>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	nh-open-source@amazon.com,
	"Jan H. Schönherr" <jschoenh@amazon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: kvm: Initialize static calls before SMP boot
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 11:19:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaiFsN3Jn_C5bTnd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260304165012.13660-1-dssauerw@amazon.de>

On Wed, Mar 04, 2026, David Sauerwein wrote:
> Updating static calls is expensive on wide SMP systems because all
> online CPUs need to act in a coordinated manner for code patching to
> work as expected.

Eww.  I am very, very against an early_initcall() in KVM, even if we pinky swear
we'll never use it for anything except prefetching static_call() targets.  The
initcall framework lacks the ability to express dependencies, and KVM most definitely
has dependencies on arch and subsys code.

I also don't like hacking KVM to workaround what is effectively a generic
infrastructure issue/limitation.

Have y'all looked at Valentin's series to defer IPIs?  I assume/hope deferring
IPIs would reduce the delay observed when doing the patching.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251010153839.151763-1-vschneid@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-04 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-04 16:50 [PATCH] x86: kvm: Initialize static calls before SMP boot David Sauerwein
2026-03-04 19:19 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-03-06 11:19   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aaiFsN3Jn_C5bTnd@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=dssauerw@amazon.de \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=jschoenh@amazon.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nh-open-source@amazon.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox