From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>, Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/19] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:30:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab10f933-b4ae-4784-a56c-b5d3bc2e3271@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231108003135.546002-11-seanjc@google.com>
On 11/8/2023 8:31 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
>
> Extend the PMU counters test to validate architectural events using fixed
> counters. The core logic is largely the same, the biggest difference
> being that if a fixed counter exists, its associated event is available
> (the SDM doesn't explicitly state this to be true, but it's KVM's ABI and
> letting software program a fixed counter that doesn't actually count would
> be quite bizarre).
>
> Note, fixed counters rely on PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
> Co-developed-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
> Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c | 54 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
> index 5b8687bb4639..9cd308417aeb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
> @@ -150,26 +150,46 @@ static void __guest_test_arch_event(uint8_t idx, struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature even
> guest_assert_event_count(idx, event, pmc, pmc_msr);
> }
>
> +#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL \
> +({ \
> + struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature feature = {}; \
> + \
> + feature; \
> +})
> +
> +static bool pmu_is_null_feature(struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature event)
> +{
> + return !(*(u64 *)&event);
> +}
> +
> static void guest_test_arch_event(uint8_t idx)
> {
> const struct {
> struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature gp_event;
> + struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature fixed_event;
> } intel_event_to_feature[] = {
> - [INTEL_ARCH_CPU_CYCLES_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_CPU_CYCLES },
> - [INTEL_ARCH_INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_INSNS_RETIRED },
> - [INTEL_ARCH_REFERENCE_CYCLES_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_REFERENCE_CYCLES },
> - [INTEL_ARCH_LLC_REFERENCES_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_LLC_REFERENCES },
> - [INTEL_ARCH_LLC_MISSES_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_LLC_MISSES },
> - [INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_RETIRED_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED },
> - [INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED },
> - [INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_SLOTS_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_SLOTS },
> + [INTEL_ARCH_CPU_CYCLES_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_CPU_CYCLES, X86_PMU_FEATURE_CPU_CYCLES_FIXED },
> + [INTEL_ARCH_INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_INSNS_RETIRED, X86_PMU_FEATURE_INSNS_RETIRED_FIXED },
> + /*
> + * Note, the fixed counter for reference cycles is NOT the same
> + * as the general purpose architectural event. The fixed counter
> + * explicitly counts at the same frequency as the TSC, whereas
> + * the GP event counts at a fixed, but uarch specific, frequency.
> + * Bundle them here for simplicity.
> + */
> + [INTEL_ARCH_REFERENCE_CYCLES_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_REFERENCE_CYCLES, X86_PMU_FEATURE_REFERENCE_TSC_CYCLES_FIXED },
> + [INTEL_ARCH_LLC_REFERENCES_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_LLC_REFERENCES, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
> + [INTEL_ARCH_LLC_MISSES_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_LLC_MISSES, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
> + [INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_RETIRED_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
> + [INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
> + [INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_SLOTS_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_SLOTS, X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_SLOTS_FIXED },
> };
>
> uint32_t nr_gp_counters = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS);
> uint32_t pmu_version = guest_get_pmu_version();
> /* PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL exists only for Architectural PMU Version 2+. */
> bool guest_has_perf_global_ctrl = pmu_version >= 2;
> - struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature gp_event;
> + struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature gp_event, fixed_event;
> uint32_t base_pmc_msr;
> unsigned int i;
>
> @@ -199,6 +219,22 @@ static void guest_test_arch_event(uint8_t idx)
> __guest_test_arch_event(idx, gp_event, i, base_pmc_msr + i,
> MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0 + i, eventsel);
> }
> +
> + if (!guest_has_perf_global_ctrl)
> + return;
> +
> + fixed_event = intel_event_to_feature[idx].fixed_event;
> + if (pmu_is_null_feature(fixed_event) || !this_pmu_has(fixed_event))
> + return;
> +
> + i = fixed_event.f.bit;
> +
> + wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, FIXED_PMC_CTRL(i, FIXED_PMC_KERNEL));
> +
> + __guest_test_arch_event(idx, fixed_event, FIXED_PMC_RDPMC_BASE + i,
> + MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + i,
> + MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL,
> + FIXED_PMC_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE(i));
> }
>
> static void guest_test_arch_events(void)
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-09 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-08 0:31 [PATCH v7 00/19] KVM: x86/pmu: selftests: Fixes and new tests Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 01/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Always treat Fixed counters as available when supported Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 02/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Allow programming events that match unsupported arch events Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 1:24 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 20:41 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 03/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Remove KVM's enumeration of Intel's architectural encodings Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 16:06 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 19:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 20:38 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 04/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Setup fixed counters' eventsel during PMU initialization Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 1:28 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 14:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 19:00 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 05/19] KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 19:11 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 06/19] KVM: selftests: Drop the "name" param from KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE() Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 07/19] KVM: selftests: Extend {kvm,this}_pmu_has() to support fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 08/19] KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h and lib/pmu.c for common PMU assets Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 09/19] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:28 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 10/19] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:30 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2023-11-09 15:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 11/19] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 12/19] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:34 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-09 15:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 13/19] KVM: selftests: Add functional test for Intel's fixed PMU counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:39 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 14/19] KVM: selftests: Expand PMU counters test to verify LLC events Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:43 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 15/19] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to query if the PMU module param is enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:45 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 16/19] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to read integer module params Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 17/19] KVM: selftests: Query module param to detect FEP in MSR filtering test Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 18/19] KVM: selftests: Move KVM_FEP macro into common library header Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 19/19] KVM: selftests: Test PMC virtualization with forced emulation Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:51 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab10f933-b4ae-4784-a56c-b5d3bc2e3271@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox