Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] x86/virt/tdx: Print TDX module basic information

["Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>]

> > >  struct tdx_sysinfo {
> > > -	struct tdx_sysinfo_tdmr_info tdmr_info;
> > > +	struct tdx_sysinfo_module_info		module_info;
> > > +	struct tdx_sysinfo_module_version	module_version;
> > > +	struct tdx_sysinfo_tdmr_info		tdmr_info;
> > 
> > Compare that to:
> > 
> >         struct tdx_sys_info {
> >                 struct tdx_sys_info_features features;
> >                 struct tdx_sys_info_version version;
> >                 struct tdx_sys_info_tdmr tdmr;
> >         };
> > 
> > ...and tell me which oine is easier to read.
> 
> I agree this is easier to read if we don't look at the JSON file.  On the
> other hand, following JSON file's "Class" names IMHO we can more easily
> find which class to look at for a given member.
> 
> So I think they both have pros/cons, and I have no hard opinion on this.
> 

Hi Dan,

Btw, if we aim (either now or eventually) to auto generate all metadata
fields based on JSON file, I think it would be easier to name the
structures based on the "Class" names.  Otherwise we will need to do some
class-specific tweaks.