public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] KVM: s390: Permit ESA mode guests in VSIE
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2026 22:37:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adNGmUzxx5OCK69e@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bbd43c25-b624-4e23-8870-6116532316a8@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 12:00:59PM +0200, Janosch Frank wrote:
> KVM is the latest hypervisor in a long list on s390. As such we implemented
> the newest architecture as our starting point and only architecture
> (zArch/64bit).
> 
> There are others which don't start their guests from zArch mode but start
> them in ESA and slowly move them through modes until they reach zArch. Those
> other hypervisors often implement emulation for features and devices that
> KVM doesn't support so there's some demand for using them.
> 
> Why do we nest those hypervisors under KVM? We have products that work with
> the KVM API so it's easier to nest than to re-write the product to use other
> hypervisors in the first place.

Makes sense.  Maybe mention this in the cover letter, and also that
you're not looking into full device model support for older systems?


      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-06  5:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-01  2:09 [PATCH v1 0/4] KVM: s390: Permit ESA mode guests in VSIE Eric Farman
2026-04-01  2:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM: s390: vsie: Allow non-zarch guests Eric Farman
2026-04-01 11:25   ` Janosch Frank
2026-04-01 13:31     ` Eric Farman
2026-04-01  2:09 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] KVM: s390: vsie: Disable some bits when in ESA mode Eric Farman
2026-04-01 12:58   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-04-01 13:46     ` Eric Farman
2026-04-01 14:50       ` Janosch Frank
2026-04-01  2:09 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] KVM: s390: vsie: Accommodate ESA prefix pages Eric Farman
2026-04-01 11:45   ` Janosch Frank
2026-04-01 13:44     ` Eric Farman
2026-04-01  2:09 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] KVM: s390: Add KVM capability for ESA mode guests Eric Farman
2026-04-01 11:52   ` Janosch Frank
2026-04-01  6:40 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] KVM: s390: Permit ESA mode guests in VSIE Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 10:00   ` Janosch Frank
2026-04-06  5:37     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adNGmUzxx5OCK69e@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox