public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com, KVM Mailing List <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-S390 Mailing List <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm390-list@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/15] KVM: s390: add function process_gib_alert_list()
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 20:19:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae479e60-d235-acf3-55cc-afd875644a19@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <645d74cf-7448-f143-c899-bdcf290dac59@linux.ibm.com>


On 03.01.19 15:43, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 19/12/2018 20:17, Michael Mueller wrote:
>> This function processes the Gib Alert List (GAL). It is required
>> to run when either a gib alert interruption has been received or
>> a gisa that is in the alert list is cleared or dropped.
>>
>> The GAL is build up by millicode, when the respective ISC bit is
>> set in the Interruption Alert Mask (IAM) and an interruption of
>> that class is observed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 140 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 140 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> index 48a93f5e5333..03e7ba4f215a 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> @@ -2941,6 +2941,146 @@ int kvm_s390_get_irq_state(struct kvm_vcpu 
>> *vcpu, __u8 __user *buf, int len)
>>       return n;
>>   }
>>   +static int __try_airqs_kick(struct kvm *kvm, u8 ipm)
>
> static inline ?


will add


>
>> +{
>> +    struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt *fi = &kvm->arch.float_int;
>> +    struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL, *kick_vcpu[MAX_ISC + 1];
>> +    int online_vcpus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
>> +    u8 ioint_mask, isc_mask, kick_mask = 0x00;
>> +    int vcpu_id, kicked = 0;
>> +
>> +    /* Loop over vcpus in WAIT state. */
>> +    for (vcpu_id = find_first_bit(fi->idle_mask, online_vcpus);
>> +         /* Until all pending ISCs have a vcpu open for airqs. */
>> +         (~kick_mask & ipm) && vcpu_id < online_vcpus;
>> +         vcpu_id = find_next_bit(fi->idle_mask, online_vcpus, 
>> vcpu_id)) {
>> +        vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_id);
>> +        if (psw_ioint_disabled(vcpu))
>> +            continue;
>> +        ioint_mask = (u8)(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[6] >> 24);
>> +        for (isc_mask = 0x80; isc_mask; isc_mask >>= 1) {
>> +            /* ISC pending in IPM ? */
>> +            if (!(ipm & isc_mask))
>> +                continue;
>> +            /* vcpu for this ISC already found ? */
>> +            if (kick_mask & isc_mask)
>> +                continue;
>> +            /* vcpu open for airq of this ISC ? */
>> +            if (!(ioint_mask & isc_mask))
>> +                continue;
>> +            /* use this vcpu (for all ISCs in ioint_mask) */
>> +            kick_mask |= ioint_mask; > + kick_vcpu[kicked++] = vcpu;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (vcpu && ~kick_mask & ipm)
>> +        VM_EVENT(kvm, 4, "gib alert undeliverable isc mask 0x%02x",
>> +             ~kick_mask & ipm);
>> +
>> +    for (vcpu_id = 0; vcpu_id < kicked; vcpu_id++)
>> +        kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup(kick_vcpu[vcpu_id]);
>> +
>> +    return (online_vcpus != 0) ? kicked : -ENODEV;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __floating_airqs_kick(struct kvm *kvm)
> static inline ?


and here as well


>
>> +{
>> +    struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt *fi = &kvm->arch.float_int;
>> +    int online_vcpus, kicked;
>> +    u8 ipm_t0, ipm;
>> +
>> +    /* Get IPM and return if clean, IAM has been restored. */
>> +    ipm = get_ipm(kvm->arch.gisa, IRQ_FLAG_IAM);
>
> If we do not get an IPM here, it must have been stolen by the firmware 
> for delivery to the guest.
> Then why restoring the IAM?
>
> Or do I miss something?
>
>> +    if (!ipm)
>> +        return;
>> +retry:
>> +    ipm_t0 = ipm;
>> +
>> +    /* Try to kick some vcpus in WAIT state. */
>> +    kicked = __try_airqs_kick(kvm, ipm);
>> +    if (kicked < 0)
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    /* Get IPM and return if clean, IAM has been restored. */
>> +    ipm = get_ipm(kvm->arch.gisa, IRQ_FLAG_IAM);
>> +    if (!ipm)
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    /* Start over, if new ISC bits are pending in IPM. */
>> +    if ((ipm_t0 ^ ipm) & ~ipm_t0)
>> +        goto retry;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Return as we just kicked at least one vcpu in WAIT state
>> +     * open for airqs. The IAM will be restored latest when one
>> +     * of them goes into WAIT or STOP state.
>> +     */
>> +    if (kicked > 0)
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * No vcpu was kicked either because no vcpu was in WAIT state
>> +     * or none of the vcpus in WAIT state are open for airqs.
>> +     * Return immediately if no vcpus are in WAIT state.
>> +     * There are vcpus in RUN state. They will process the airqs
>> +     * if not closed for airqs as well. In that case the system will
>> +     * delay airqs until a vcpu decides to take airqs again.
>> +     */
>> +    online_vcpus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
>> +    if (!bitmap_weight(fi->idle_mask, online_vcpus))
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * None of the vcpus in WAIT state take airqs and we might
>> +     * have no running vcpus as at least one vcpu is in WAIT state
>> +     * and IPM is dirty.
>> +     */
>> +    set_iam(kvm->arch.gisa, kvm->arch.iam);
>
> I do not understand why we need to set IAM here.
> The interrupt will be delivered by the firmware as soon as the PSW or 
> CR6 is changed by any vCPU.
> ...and if this does not happen we can not deliver the interrupt anyway.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define NULL_GISA_ADDR 0x00000000UL
>> +#define NONE_GISA_ADDR 0x00000001UL
>> +#define GISA_ADDR_MASK 0xfffff000UL
>> +
>> +static void __maybe_unused process_gib_alert_list(void)
>> +{
>> +    u32 final, next_alert, origin = 0UL;
>> +    struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa;
>> +    struct kvm *kvm;
>> +
>> +    do {
>> +        /*
>> +         * If the NONE_GISA_ADDR is still stored in the alert list
>> +         * origin, we will leave the outer loop. No further GISA has
>> +         * been added to the alert list by millicode while processing
>> +         * the current alert list.
>> +         */
>> +        final = (origin & NONE_GISA_ADDR);
>> +        /*
>> +         * Cut off the alert list and store the NONE_GISA_ADDR in the
>> +         * alert list origin to avoid further GAL interruptions.
>> +         * A new alert list can be build up by millicode in parallel
>> +         * for guests not in the yet cut-off alert list. When in the
>> +         * final loop, store the NULL_GISA_ADDR instead. This will re-
>> +         * enable GAL interruptions on the host again.
>> +         */
>> +        origin = xchg(&gib->alert_list_origin,
>> +                  (!final) ? NONE_GISA_ADDR : NULL_GISA_ADDR);
>> +        /* Loop through the just cut-off alert list. */
>> +        while (origin & GISA_ADDR_MASK) {
>> +            gisa = (struct kvm_s390_gisa *)(u64)origin;
>> +            next_alert = gisa->next_alert;
>> +            /* Unlink the GISA from the alert list. */
>> +            gisa->next_alert = origin;
>
> AFAIU this enable GISA interrupt for the guest...
>
>> +            kvm = container_of(gisa, struct sie_page2, gisa)->kvm;
>> +            /* Kick suitable vcpus */
>> +            __floating_airqs_kick(kvm);
>
> ...and here we kick a VCPU for the guest.
>
> Logically I would do it in the otherway, first kicking the vCPU then 
> enabling the GISA interruption again.
>
> If the IPM bit is cleared by the firmware during delivering the 
> interrupt to the guest before we enter get_ipm() called by 
> __floating_airqs_kick() we will set the IAM despite we have a running 
> CPU handling the IRQ.
> In the worst case we can also set the IAM with the GISA in the alert 
> list.
> Or we must accept that the firmware can deliver the IPM as soon as we 
> reset the GISA next field.
>
>> +            origin = next_alert;
>> +        }
>> +    } while (!final);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void nullify_gisa(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa)
>>   {
>>       memset(gisa, 0, sizeof(struct kvm_s390_gisa));
>>
>
> I think that avoiding to restore the IAM during the call to get_ipm 
> inside __floating_airqs_kick() would good.
>
> If you agree, with that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel<pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>
>
-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Michael Müller

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Matthias Hartmann
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-07 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-19 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/15] KVM: s390: make use of the GIB Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] KVM: s390: unregister debug feature on failing arch init Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 20:10   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-20  7:49     ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-20  7:55       ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] KVM: s390: coding style issue kvm_s390_gisa_init/clear() Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 20:13   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-02 16:50   ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 16:16     ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] KVM: s390: factor out nullify_gisa() Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] KVM: s390: use pending_irqs_no_gisa() where appropriate Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 20:16   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-02 16:52   ` Pierre Morel
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] KVM: s390: unify pending_irqs() and pending_irqs_no_gisa() Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 10:09   ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 11:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-20 11:49     ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 12:15       ` Halil Pasic
2018-12-20 12:21       ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-20 12:33         ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 15:43           ` pierre morel
2018-12-20 16:40             ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] KVM: s390: remove prefix kvm_s390_gisa_ from static inline functions Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 12:24   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-20 14:37     ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] s390/cio: add function chsc_sgib() Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] KVM: s390: add the GIB and its related life-cyle functions Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 12:28   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-03  9:49   ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 16:25     ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] KVM: s390: add kvm reference to struct sie_page2 Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] KVM: s390: add functions to (un)register GISC with GISA Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 14:32   ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-02 17:29   ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-02 18:26     ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-04 13:19     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-07 17:38       ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-08 10:34         ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-08 13:07           ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-08 13:35             ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-08 13:36           ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-08 13:41             ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-08 14:23               ` Halil Pasic
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] KVM: s390: restore IAM in get_ipm() when IPM is clean Michael Mueller
2019-01-03 15:06   ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 18:17     ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-06 23:32   ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-08  8:06     ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] KVM: s390: do not restore IAM immediately before SIE entry Michael Mueller
2019-01-03 15:00   ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 17:53     ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] KVM: s390: add function process_gib_alert_list() Michael Mueller
2019-01-03 14:43   ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 19:18     ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-08 14:27       ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-09 11:39       ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 19:19     ` Michael Mueller [this message]
2019-01-08  6:37       ` Heiko Carstens
2019-01-08 12:59   ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-08 15:21     ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-08 18:34       ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-09 12:14       ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-09 13:10         ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-09 14:49           ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-09 16:18             ` Halil Pasic
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] KVM: s390: add and wire function gib_alert_irq_handler() Michael Mueller
2019-01-03 15:16   ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-08 10:06     ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-09 12:35       ` Pierre Morel
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] KVM: s390: start using the GIB Michael Mueller
2019-01-02 17:45   ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-08  9:03     ` Michael Mueller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ae479e60-d235-acf3-55cc-afd875644a19@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm390-list@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox