Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: Take gpa_t in kvm_vcpu_map[_readonly]()

[Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 04:19:03PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 05:11:30PM -0700, Peter Fang wrote:
> > > Move the conversion from a gpa_t to a gfn_t into kvm_vcpu_map() and
> > > kvm_vcpu_map_readonly() so that they take a gpa_t directly, reducing
> > > boilerplate at call sites.
> > > 
> > > __kvm_vcpu_map() still takes a gfn_t because guest page mapping is
> > > fundamentally GFN-based.
> > > 
> > > No functional change intended.
> > > 
> > > Compile-tested on x86 and ppc, which are the current users of these
> > > interfaces.
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Fang <peter.fang@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > I was going to suggest a WARN in kvm_vcpu_map() and
> > kvm_vcpu_map_readonly() if the passed GPA is not page-aligned, but Sean
> > usually hates my paranoid WARN suggestions.
> 
> Heh, for good reason.  Adding such a WARN would be triggered by this code:
> 
>                 if (!kvm_vcpu_map(vcpu, vmcs12->posted_intr_desc_addr, map)) {
>                         vmx->nested.pi_desc =
>                                 (struct pi_desc *)(((void *)map->hva) +
>                                 offset_in_page(vmcs12->posted_intr_desc_addr));
> 
> The PI descriptor only needs to be 64-bit aligned, not page-aligned.

I didn't know that, thanks for pointing out. You meant 64-byte aligned
though, right?