Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>, seanjc@google.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chao.gao@intel.com,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/21] x86/fpu: Ignore APX when copying from/to guest FPU
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 19:42:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afdca8eb-cfad-4f8b-b809-fdb107e43fce@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512011502.53072-7-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

On 5/12/26 03:14, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> 
> KVM will store APX extended GPRs directly in the regs[] field of struct
> kvm_vcpu.  This is done to make accessors more uniform between GPRs and
> EGPRs, and partly because x86 maintainers expressed the desire to compile
> Linux with APX enabled sooner or later; accessing guest EGPRs from KVM's
> C code would get in the way.
> 
> Therefore, let KVM handle the APX feature on its own when executing
> ioctls to get and set the virtual machine's XSAVE state.
> 
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> [ chang: adjust function prototype ]
> Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

Boris, Dave, can you please ACK these changes to core FPU code?

Thanks,

Paolo

> ---
> V3 -> V4: New patch
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h | 2 +-
>   arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c     | 9 +++++++--
>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h
> index cd6f194a912b..0b218f5eaafd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/api.h
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static inline void fpu_sync_guest_vmexit_xfd_state(void) { }
>   
>   extern void fpu_copy_guest_fpstate_to_uabi(struct fpu_guest *gfpu, void *buf,
>   					   unsigned int size, u64 xfeatures, u32 pkru);
> -extern int fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu, const void *buf, u64 xcr0, u32 *vpkru);
> +extern int fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu, void *buf, u64 xcr0, u32 *vpkru);
>   
>   static inline void fpstate_set_confidential(struct fpu_guest *gfpu)
>   {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> index 608983806fd7..ae5c73faed69 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
> @@ -420,6 +420,8 @@ void fpu_copy_guest_fpstate_to_uabi(struct fpu_guest *gfpu, void *buf,
>   	struct membuf mb = { .p = buf, .left = size };
>   
>   	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE)) {
> +		/* Up to date APX registers are in struct kvm_vcpu anyway.  */
> +		xfeatures &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_APX;
>   		__copy_xstate_to_uabi_buf(mb, kstate, xfeatures, pkru,
>   					  XSTATE_COPY_XSAVE);
>   	} else {
> @@ -431,11 +433,11 @@ void fpu_copy_guest_fpstate_to_uabi(struct fpu_guest *gfpu, void *buf,
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM(fpu_copy_guest_fpstate_to_uabi);
>   
> -int fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu, const void *buf,
> +int fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu, void *buf,
>   				   u64 xcr0, u32 *vpkru)
>   {
>   	struct fpstate *kstate = gfpu->fpstate;
> -	const union fpregs_state *ustate = buf;
> +	union fpregs_state *ustate = buf;
>   
>   	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE)) {
>   		if (ustate->xsave.header.xfeatures & ~XFEATURE_MASK_FPSSE)
> @@ -464,6 +466,9 @@ int fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate(struct fpu_guest *gfpu, const void *buf,
>   	if (!(ustate->xsave.header.xfeatures & XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU))
>   		vpkru = NULL;
>   
> +	/* APX registers are copied to and from struct kvm_vcpu, not the FPU.  */
> +	ustate->xsave.header.xfeatures &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_APX;
> +
>   	return copy_uabi_from_kernel_to_xstate(kstate, ustate, vpkru);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM(fpu_copy_uabi_to_guest_fpstate);


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12  1:14 [PATCH v4 00/21] KVM: x86: Enable APX for guests Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] KVM: VMX: Macrofy GPR swapping in __vmx_vcpu_run() Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] KVM: SVM: Macrofy GPR swapping in __svm_vcpu_run() Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] KVM: SEV: Macrofy GPR swapping in __svm_sev_es_vcpu_run() Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] KVM: x86: Extend VCPU registers for EGPRs Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] KVM: VMX: Save guest EGPRs in VCPU cache Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] x86/fpu: Ignore APX when copying from/to guest FPU Chang S. Bae
2026-05-13 17:42   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2026-05-13 19:10   ` Dave Hansen
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] KVM: x86: Support APX state for XSAVE ABI Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] KVM: VMX: Refactor VMX instruction information access Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] KVM: VMX: Refactor instruction information decoding Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] KVM: VMX: Refactor register index retrieval from exit qualification Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] KVM: VMX: Support instruction information extension Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] KVM: nVMX: Propagate the extended instruction info field Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] KVM: x86: Support EGPR accessing and tracking for emulator Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] KVM: x86: Handle EGPR index and REX2-incompatible opcodes Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] KVM: x86: Support REX2-prefixed opcode decode Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] KVM: x86: Reject EVEX-prefixed instructions Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] KVM: x86: Guard valid XCR0.APX settings Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] KVM: x86: Expose APX foundation feature to guests Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:15 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features " Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:15 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state and ABI test Chang S. Bae
2026-05-12  1:15 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state handling and XCR0 sanity checks Chang S. Bae
2026-05-13 17:52 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] KVM: x86: Enable APX for guests Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afdca8eb-cfad-4f8b-b809-fdb107e43fce@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox