From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Clayton Pence <ctpence@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86: Virtualize AMD CPUID faulting
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 14:33:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agOcw9ZIXALKrs_a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508170714.489136-3-jmattson@google.com>
On Fri, May 08, 2026, Jim Mattson wrote:
> static __always_inline void kvm_cpu_cap_clear(unsigned int x86_feature)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index c8c6cc0406d6..127d031d3310 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -3593,13 +3593,15 @@ static int em_sti(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> static int em_cpuid(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> - u64 msr = 0;
> + u64 msr[2] = {};
>
> - ctxt->ops->get_msr(ctxt, MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, &msr);
> - if (!ctxt->ops->is_smm(ctxt) &&
> - (msr & MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES_CPUID_FAULT) &&
> - ctxt->ops->cpl(ctxt))
> - return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
> + if (!ctxt->ops->is_smm(ctxt) && ctxt->ops->cpl(ctxt)) {
> + ctxt->ops->get_msr(ctxt, MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, &msr[0]);
> + ctxt->ops->get_msr(ctxt, MSR_K7_HWCR, &msr[1]);
> + if ((msr[0] & MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES_CPUID_FAULT) ||
> + (msr[1] & BIT_ULL(MSR_K7_HWCR_CPUID_USER_DIS_BIT)))
Hrm, this is all rather ugly (definitely not your fault). What do you think about
adding x86_emulate_ops.cpuid_fault_enabled() to at least get deduplicate the MSR
lookups?
Gah, we should do more than that. I was going to say, "If it weren't for
kvm_emulate_cpuid() using kvm_require_cpl(), we could roll *all* of the checks
into cpuid_fault_enabled()". But that's a rather stupid reason to duplicate the
code, because kvm_emulate_cpuid() is literally the only user of kvm_require_cpl().
Pulling smm.h into cpuid.h isn't great, but the code is much nicer, especially
the next patch to add AMD CPUID faulting.
Compile tested only...
---
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 14:20:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: Consolidate CPUID fault handling for emulator
and interception logic
Extract the logic for emulating CPUID faulting (where CPUID #GPs at CPL>0
outside of SMM) into a dedicated helper and use the helper for both the
full emulator and the intercepted-CPUID paths.
Opportunistically drop kvm_require_cpl(), as kvm_require_cpl() was the one
and only user.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 5 +++--
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 8 ++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 6 +-----
arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 18 ++++++------------
6 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index c470e40a00aa..a9005c61619b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -2285,7 +2285,6 @@ void kvm_requeue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int nr,
void kvm_inject_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct x86_exception *fault);
void kvm_inject_emulated_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct x86_exception *fault);
-bool kvm_require_cpl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int required_cpl);
bool kvm_require_dr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int dr);
static inline int __kvm_irq_line_state(unsigned long *irq_state,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index e69156b54cff..1c95d1fa3ead 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -2161,9 +2161,10 @@ int kvm_emulate_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
- if (!is_smm(vcpu) && cpuid_fault_enabled(vcpu) &&
- !kvm_require_cpl(vcpu, 0))
+ if (!kvm_is_cpuid_allowed(vcpu)) {
+ kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, GP_VECTOR, 0);
return 1;
+ }
eax = kvm_rax_read(vcpu);
ecx = kvm_rcx_read(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
index 8b64d863e19c..95d09ccbf951 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <uapi/asm/kvm_para.h>
+#include "smm.h"
+
extern u32 kvm_cpu_caps[NR_KVM_CPU_CAPS] __read_mostly;
extern bool kvm_is_configuring_cpu_caps __read_mostly;
@@ -187,6 +189,12 @@ static inline bool cpuid_fault_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES_CPUID_FAULT;
}
+static inline bool kvm_is_cpuid_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return !cpuid_fault_enabled(vcpu) || is_smm(vcpu) ||
+ !kvm_x86_call(get_cpl)(vcpu);
+}
+
static __always_inline void kvm_cpu_cap_clear(unsigned int x86_feature)
{
unsigned int x86_leaf = __feature_leaf(x86_feature);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index c8c6cc0406d6..3ba09093b5ab 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -3593,12 +3593,8 @@ static int em_sti(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
static int em_cpuid(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
{
u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
- u64 msr = 0;
- ctxt->ops->get_msr(ctxt, MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, &msr);
- if (!ctxt->ops->is_smm(ctxt) &&
- (msr & MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES_CPUID_FAULT) &&
- ctxt->ops->cpl(ctxt))
+ if (!ctxt->ops->is_cpuid_allowed(ctxt))
return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
eax = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
index 0abff36d0994..45d4a03b202e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ struct x86_emulate_ops {
struct x86_instruction_info *info,
enum x86_intercept_stage stage);
+ bool (*is_cpuid_allowed)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
bool (*get_cpuid)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx,
u32 *ecx, u32 *edx, bool exact_only);
bool (*guest_has_movbe)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 7d5b66287593..c60773349f35 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1021,18 +1021,6 @@ void kvm_queue_exception_e(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr, u32 error_code)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM_INTERNAL(kvm_queue_exception_e);
-/*
- * Checks if cpl <= required_cpl; if true, return true. Otherwise queue
- * a #GP and return false.
- */
-bool kvm_require_cpl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int required_cpl)
-{
- if (kvm_x86_call(get_cpl)(vcpu) <= required_cpl)
- return true;
- kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, GP_VECTOR, 0);
- return false;
-}
-
bool kvm_require_dr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int dr)
{
if ((dr != 4 && dr != 5) || !kvm_is_cr4_bit_set(vcpu, X86_CR4_DE))
@@ -8819,6 +8807,11 @@ static int emulator_intercept(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
&ctxt->exception);
}
+static bool emulator_is_cpuid_allowed(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
+{
+ return kvm_is_cpuid_allowed(emul_to_vcpu(ctxt));
+}
+
static bool emulator_get_cpuid(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
u32 *eax, u32 *ebx, u32 *ecx, u32 *edx,
bool exact_only)
@@ -8955,6 +8948,7 @@ static const struct x86_emulate_ops emulate_ops = {
.wbinvd = emulator_wbinvd,
.fix_hypercall = emulator_fix_hypercall,
.intercept = emulator_intercept,
+ .is_cpuid_allowed = emulator_is_cpuid_allowed,
.get_cpuid = emulator_get_cpuid,
.guest_has_movbe = emulator_guest_has_movbe,
.guest_has_fxsr = emulator_guest_has_fxsr,
base-commit: 41a2602f2947b91e237cd1ce85afcd162274470a
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 17:07 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: x86: Virtualize AMD CPUID faulting Jim Mattson
2026-05-08 17:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: Remove supports_cpuid_fault() helper Jim Mattson
2026-05-08 17:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86: Virtualize AMD CPUID faulting Jim Mattson
2026-05-12 21:33 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-05-13 0:01 ` Jim Mattson
2026-05-13 0:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-08 17:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: selftests: Update hwcr_msr_test for CPUID faulting bit Jim Mattson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agOcw9ZIXALKrs_a@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ctpence@google.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox