Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/20] KVM: arm64: Set up FGT for Partitioned PMU
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 00:34:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agQpbiD8Fi6fzomf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260504211813.1804997-8-coltonlewis@google.com>

On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 09:18:00PM +0000, Colton Lewis wrote:
> +static void __compute_hdfgrtr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	__compute_fgt(vcpu, HDFGRTR_EL2);
> +
> +	*vcpu_fgt(vcpu, HDFGRTR_EL2) |=
> +		HDFGRTR_EL2_PMOVS
> +		| HDFGRTR_EL2_PMCCFILTR_EL0
> +		| HDFGRTR_EL2_PMEVTYPERn_EL0
> +		| HDFGRTR_EL2_PMCEIDn_EL0
> +		| HDFGRTR_EL2_PMMIR_EL1;
> +}
> +

I've given this feedback at least twice already...

Operators go on the preceding line in the case of line continuations.

> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_is_partitioned() - Determine if given PMU is partitioned
> + * @pmu: Pointer to arm_pmu struct
> + *
> + * Determine if given PMU is partitioned by looking at hpmn field. The
> + * PMU is partitioned if this field is less than the number of
> + * counters in the system.
> + *
> + * Return: True if the PMU is partitioned, false otherwise
> + */
> +bool kvm_pmu_is_partitioned(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +	if (!pmu)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return pmu->max_guest_counters >= 0 &&
> +		pmu->max_guest_counters <= *host_data_ptr(nr_event_counters);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_vcpu_pmu_is_partitioned() - Determine if given VCPU has a partitioned PMU
> + * @vcpu: Pointer to kvm_vcpu struct
> + *
> + * Determine if given VCPU has a partitioned PMU by extracting that
> + * field and passing it to :c:func:`kvm_pmu_is_partitioned`
> + *
> + * Return: True if the VCPU PMU is partitioned, false otherwise
> + */
> +bool kvm_vcpu_pmu_is_partitioned(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return kvm_pmu_is_partitioned(vcpu->kvm->arch.arm_pmu) &&
> +		false;
> +}

Ok, I'm thoroughly confused about these predicates.

Whether or not a vCPU is using a partitioned PMU is a per-VM property.
This is separate from whether or not the backing arm_pmu has a range of
available counters for the guest to use.

It is entirely possible that a VM *isn't* using the partitioned PMU
feature (i.e. backed with perf events) yet the supporting arm_pmu has a
guest counter range.

 
> +#if !defined(__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__)
> +bool kvm_vcpu_pmu_is_partitioned(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +bool kvm_vcpu_pmu_use_fgt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +#else
> +static inline bool kvm_vcpu_pmu_is_partitioned(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool kvm_vcpu_pmu_use_fgt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> +

Don't use ifdeffery for this. Aim to have a single definition and rely
on has_vhe() to do the rest of the work.
 
Thanks,
Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-04 21:17 [PATCH v7 00/20] ARM64 PMU Partitioning Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:17 ` [PATCH v7 01/20] arm64: cpufeature: Add cpucap for HPMN0 Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:17 ` [PATCH v7 02/20] KVM: arm64: Reorganize PMU includes Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:17 ` [PATCH v7 03/20] KVM: arm64: Reorganize PMU functions Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:17 ` [PATCH v7 04/20] perf: arm_pmuv3: Generalize counter bitmasks Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:17 ` [PATCH v7 05/20] perf: arm_pmuv3: Check cntr_mask before using pmccntr Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:17 ` [PATCH v7 06/20] perf: arm_pmuv3: Add method to partition the PMU Colton Lewis
2026-05-11 14:51   ` James Clark
2026-05-13 16:13     ` Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 07/20] KVM: arm64: Set up FGT for Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2026-05-13  7:34   ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 08/20] KVM: arm64: Add Partitioned PMU register trap handlers Colton Lewis
2026-05-13  7:45   ` Oliver Upton
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 09/20] KVM: arm64: Set up MDCR_EL2 to handle a Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2026-05-13  7:57   ` Oliver Upton
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 10/20] KVM: arm64: Context swap Partitioned PMU guest registers Colton Lewis
2026-05-11 14:49   ` James Clark
2026-05-13 16:38     ` Colton Lewis
2026-05-13  9:18   ` Oliver Upton
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 11/20] KVM: arm64: Enforce PMU event filter at vcpu_load() Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 12/20] perf: Add perf_pmu_resched_update() Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 13/20] KVM: arm64: Apply dynamic guest counter reservations Colton Lewis
2026-05-11 14:47   ` James Clark
2026-05-13 16:45     ` Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 14/20] KVM: arm64: Implement lazy PMU context swaps Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 15/20] perf: arm_pmuv3: Handle IRQs for Partitioned PMU guest counters Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 16/20] KVM: arm64: Detect overflows for the Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 17/20] KVM: arm64: Add vCPU device attr to partition the PMU Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 18/20] KVM: selftests: Add find_bit to KVM library Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 19/20] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add test case for Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2026-05-04 21:18 ` [PATCH v7 20/20] KVM: arm64: selftests: Relax testing for exceptions when partitioned Colton Lewis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agQpbiD8Fi6fzomf@kernel.org \
    --to=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox