From: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Hold kvm->mmu_lock while initialising vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 09:34:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aibvIDkOjCLkwkoW@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608081108.2244133-1-maz@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 09:11:08AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Sashiko reports that there is a race between initialising vncr_tlb
> and making use of it, as we don't hold the mmu_lock at this point.
>
> Additionally, it identifies a memory leak, should userspace repeatedly
> invokes the KVM_RUN ioctl after a failure of kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(),
> as we assign vncr_tlb blindly on first run, irrespective of prior
> allocations.
>
> Slap the two bugs in one go by taking the kvm->mmu_lock on assigning
> vncr_tlb, preventing the race for good, and by checking that vncr_tlb
> is indeed NULL prior to allocation.
>
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260607180815.85FBC1F00893@smtp.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Oliver
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> index 690b8e8564166..d11e36b3cfcc2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -1253,8 +1253,14 @@ int kvm_vcpu_allocate_vncr_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (!kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, NV_frac, NV2_ONLY))
> return 0;
>
> - vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb = kzalloc_obj(*vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb,
> - GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> + if (!vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb) {
> + struct vncr_tlb *vt = kzalloc_obj(*vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb,
> + GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> +
> + scoped_guard(write_lock, &vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock)
> + vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb = vt;
> + }
> +
> if (!vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 8:11 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Hold kvm->mmu_lock while initialising vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb Marc Zyngier
2026-06-08 8:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 9:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-08 16:34 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2026-06-08 20:55 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aibvIDkOjCLkwkoW@kernel.org \
--to=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox