From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: suryasaimadhu <SaiMadhu.KoyyalaHariVenkata@amd.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Preserve KVM_EXIT_DEBUG on emulated HLT with single-step
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 10:01:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak_T_YM7Oc0Ne--m@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709055321.EED4B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Thu, Jul 09, 2026, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> KVM: x86: Preserve KVM_EXIT_DEBUG on emulated HLT with single-step
>
> kvm_emulate_halt() calls kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() before
> kvm_emulate_halt_noskip(). When single-step debugging is active,
> the skip path can trigger a debug exception and set exit_reason to
> KVM_EXIT_DEBUG, but halt emulation then overwrites it with
> KVM_EXIT_HLT on the userspace LAPIC path. Return immediately when
> a debug exit is already pending so userspace debuggers receive the
> correct event.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index ff8812f3a1293..473a03f58e263 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -11701,10 +11701,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM_INTERNAL(kvm_emulate_halt_noskip);
> > int kvm_emulate_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > int ret = kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> > +
> > /*
> > - * TODO: we might be squashing a GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP-triggered
> > - * KVM_EXIT_DEBUG here.
> > + * If kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() triggered a singlestep
> > + * debug exception, return to userspace immediately so the
> > + * debugger can process the event. Do not let halt emulation
> > + * overwrite the KVM_EXIT_DEBUG exit reason.
> > */
> > + if (vcpu->run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_DEBUG)
> > + return ret;
>
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does restricting this early
> return exclusively to KVM_EXIT_DEBUG overwrite other critical exit reasons?
>
> If kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() fails (e.g., executing HLT inside an
> SGX enclave), it queues KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR and returns 0.
>
> Because this check only handles KVM_EXIT_DEBUG, emulation failures fall
> through to kvm_emulate_halt_noskip(), which then overwrites the exit reason
> with KVM_EXIT_HLT for the userspace LAPIC path.
>
> > +
> > return kvm_emulate_halt_noskip(vcpu) && ret;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM_INTERNAL(kvm_emulate_halt);
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but it looks like the same issue is present in
> kvm_emulate_ap_reset_hold().
>
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_emulate_ap_reset_hold() {
> ...
> int ret = kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
>
> return __kvm_emulate_halt(vcpu, KVM_MP_STATE_AP_RESET_HOLD,
> KVM_EXIT_AP_RESET_HOLD) && ret;
> }
>
> Because && evaluates left-to-right, __kvm_emulate_halt() executes
> unconditionally and overwrites the exit reason with KVM_EXIT_AP_RESET_HOLD,
> even if kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() already returned 0 to exit to
> userspace with a debug exception or emulation failure.
>
> Does kvm_emulate_ap_reset_hold() need a similar fix?
I think we should simply delete the TODO. Architecturally, the HLT side effects
effectively have priority over the single-step #DB because the such #DBs are in
the "Traps on the Previous Instruction" class of exceptions, i.e. by definition,
the previous instruction has to have retired to take the single-step #DB.
And in practice, running without an in-kernel local APIC is all but deprecated
these days, so I don't see any value in going out of our way to split hairs over
which userspace exit is the "best" in this case.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 5:39 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Preserve KVM_EXIT_DEBUG on emulated HLT with single-step suryasaimadhu
2026-07-09 5:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:01 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ak_T_YM7Oc0Ne--m@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=SaiMadhu.KoyyalaHariVenkata@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox