From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] x86/hyper-v: reenlightenment notifications support Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 08:48:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20180116182700.1042-4-vkuznets@redhat.com> <201801191841.QZ26OYif%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <87o9lqdt15.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: kbuild test robot , kbuild-all@01.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger , =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Radim_Kr=E8m=E1=F8?= , Haiyang Zhang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" , Ingo Molnar , Roman Kagan , Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , Paolo Bonzini , Mohammed Gamal To: Vitaly Kuznetsov Return-path: Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:52555 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751023AbeATHsR (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jan 2018 02:48:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87o9lqdt15.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > kbuild test robot writes: > > > Hi Vitaly, > > > > Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > > > [auto build test WARNING on tip/auto-latest] > > [also build test WARNING on v4.15-rc8 next-20180118] > > [cannot apply to tip/x86/core kvm/linux-next] > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vitaly-Kuznetsov/x86-kvm-hyperv-stable-clocksorce-for-L2-guests-when-running-nested-KVM-on-Hyper-V/20180119-160814 > > config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config) > > compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.2.0-12) 7.2.1 20171025 > > reproduce: > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > make ARCH=x86_64 > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > In file included from include/linux/kasan.h:17:0, > > from include/linux/slab.h:129, > > from include/linux/irq.h:26, > > from arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq.h:6, > > from include/linux/hardirq.h:9, > > from include/linux/interrupt.h:13, > > from arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h:8, > > from arch/x86//entry/vdso/vdso32/../vclock_gettime.c:20, > > from arch/x86//entry/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.c:33: > > arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function 'clone_pgd_range': > > arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h:1129:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'kernel_to_user_pgdp'; did you mean 'u64_to_user_ptr'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > memcpy(kernel_to_user_pgdp(dst), kernel_to_user_pgdp(src), > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Sorry but I'm failing to see how this (and all the rest) is related to > my patch ... You added '#include ' to mshyperv.h which is included in vclock_gettime.c and pulls in other stuff which fails to expand.... Thanks, tglx