From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: Preemptable Ticket Spinlock Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 22:14:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <51745650.9050204@redhat.com> <1366631460.4443.3.camel@laptop> <51753289.70406@redhat.com> <1366660147.6454.6.camel@laptop> <5175E71F.8070307@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51A73E5C.4010608@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , Jiannan Ouyang , LKML , Avi Kivity , Gleb Natapov , Ingo Molnar , Marcelo Tosatti , Srikar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Nikunj A. Dadhania" , KVM , Chegu Vinod , "Andrew M. Theurer" , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Andrew Jones , Karen Noel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Raghavendra K T Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:35114 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755138Ab3E3UOb (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2013 16:14:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <51A73E5C.4010608@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 30 May 2013, Raghavendra K T wrote: > Here is the branch with pvpspinlock V9 version in github reabsed to 3.10-rc > > https://github.com/ktraghavendra/linux/tree/pvspinlock_v9 > > planning post a formal email in a separate thread with link a to this > branch (instead of spamming with 19 patches) 19 patches is not really spam if you compare it to the total number of mails per day on LKML. The git tree is nice for people who want to test stuff easily, but if you want people to review and comment patches, then please use mail. Thanks, tglx