From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: malc Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Introduce QEMU_NEW() Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:58:13 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: References: <1311583872-362-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4E2D5D7C.40208@codemonkey.ws> <4E2D5F0D.2040303@redhat.com> <4E2D5FB3.7000906@codemonkey.ws> <4E2D7CD7.1060707@codemonkey.ws> <4E2D810E.3060104@codemonkey.ws> <4E2D82AA.8010307@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Anthony Liguori , Max Filippov , Blue Swirl , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from fe02x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.165]:55934 "EHLO akado.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751219Ab1GYO6T (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:58:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E2D82AA.8010307@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/25/2011 05:47 PM, malc wrote: > > Right right.. only g_new aborts on zero.. > > > > "If n_structs is 0 it returns NULL > . " Right you are. > > It's annoying that it takes this parameter at all, but I can live with it. > n_structs? -- mailto:av1474@comtv.ru