From: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com>
To: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
nik.borisov@suse.com, kas@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, chao.gao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: TDX: Filter configurable CPUID bits
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 09:44:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apZ0X8J31bVCoc9E@tlindgre-MOBL1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827031837.2863609-4-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 11:18:36AM +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
...
> +static u32 tdx_cfg_non_feature_mask(u32 function, u32 index, int reg)
> {
> - if (has_tsx(entry))
> - clear_tsx(entry);
> + /*
> + * For a leaf/subleaf/register that will never be repurposed to hold
> + * feature bits, it's safe to return TDX_CPUID_ALL_ALLOWED_MASK, i.e.
> + * leave the TDX module's CPUID config mask intact.
> + */
> + switch (function) {
> + case 1:
> + if (reg == CPUID_EAX || reg == CPUID_EBX)
> + return TDX_CPUID_ALL_ALLOWED_MASK;
> + return 0;
> + case 4:
> + case 0x18:
> + case 0x1f:
> + return TDX_CPUID_ALL_ALLOWED_MASK;
> + case 0x24:
> + if (index == 0 && reg == CPUID_EBX)
> + return GENMASK_U32(7, 0);
> + return 0;
> + case 0x80000008:
> + if (reg == CPUID_EAX)
> + return TDX_CPUID_ALL_ALLOWED_MASK;
> + return 0;
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +}
How about rename the above to something simpler like tdx_get_cpuid_bits()?
Sorry I don't have anything better to suggest for naming.
> +static u32 tdx_cfg_feature_mask(u32 function, u32 index, int reg)
> +{
> + for (int i = 0; i < NR_KVM_CPU_CAPS; i++) {
> + const struct cpuid_reg *cpuid = &reverse_cpuid[i];
> +
> + if (!cpuid->function)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (cpuid->function == function && cpuid->index == index &&
> + cpuid->reg == reg)
> + return tdx_cpu_cfg_caps[i];
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
And then the above to tdx_get_cpuid_feature_bits()?
> -static bool tdx_unsupported_cpuid(const struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry)
> +static u32 tdx_get_allowed_cfg_cpuid_mask(u32 function, u32 index, int reg)
> {
> - return has_tsx(entry) || has_waitpkg(entry);
> + u32 non_feature_mask = tdx_cfg_non_feature_mask(function, index, reg);
> +
> + if (non_feature_mask == TDX_CPUID_ALL_ALLOWED_MASK)
> + return TDX_CPUID_ALL_ALLOWED_MASK;
> +
> + /*
> + * It's possible that a CPUID register contains both feature and
> + * non-feature bits.
> + */
> + return non_feature_mask | tdx_cfg_feature_mask(function, index, reg);
> }
And then tdx_get_cpuid_mask()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 3:18 [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM: TDX: Validate directly configurable CPUID bits Binbin Wu
2026-08-27 3:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] KVM: TDX: Track configurable CPUID bits allowed by KVM Binbin Wu
2026-09-01 6:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2026-09-01 8:23 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-01 8:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2026-08-27 3:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: TDX: Report CORE_CAPABILITIES as configurable Binbin Wu
2026-09-01 6:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2026-08-27 3:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: TDX: Filter configurable CPUID bits Binbin Wu
2026-09-01 6:44 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2026-09-01 8:42 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-01 9:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2026-08-27 3:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: TDX: Validate userspace CPUID input for KVM_TDX_INIT_VM Binbin Wu
2026-08-27 3:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 7:25 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-01 6:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2026-08-27 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM: TDX: Validate directly configurable CPUID bits Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-08-28 3:19 ` Binbin Wu
2026-08-28 16:58 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-08-31 5:01 ` Binbin Wu
2026-09-01 9:42 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-09-01 10:21 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-09-01 9:38 ` Xiaoyao Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apZ0X8J31bVCoc9E@tlindgre-MOBL1 \
--to=tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox