From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: SEV: Free have_run_cpus during VM destruction even if VM is no longer SEV
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:27:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arQMARDUTSjbWpMX@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923165349.CAAF01F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2026, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Critical] kvm: double free of sev->have_run_cpus on initialization failure
> --
>
> commit 35fcc7370ece167eff16a7738a6c47e4815c1ae4
> Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>
> KVM: SEV: Free have_run_cpus during VM destruction even if VM is no longer SEV
>
> Unconditionally free SEV's "have run CPUs" cpumask in the VM destroy path,
> i.e. even for what appear to be non-SEV VMs, as an SEV VM becomes a non-SEV
> VM if its state is intra-host migrated.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> > index 63e8cfa9bf559..c9242c936a401 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> > @@ -2981,13 +2981,17 @@ void sev_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
> > struct list_head *head = &sev->regions_list;
> > struct list_head *pos, *q;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Free the mask even if the VM is not *currently* an SEV VM, as it may
> > + * have been an SEV VM prior to intra-host migration.
> > + */
> > + free_cpumask_var(sev->have_run_cpus);
>
> [Severity: Critical]
> Can this cause a double free of sev->have_run_cpus?
>
> If a user issues a KVM_SEV_INIT ioctl and __sev_guest_init() fails after
> allocating the cpumask, the error path in __sev_guest_init() frees the
> mask but leaves the pointer intact:
>
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c:__sev_guest_init() {
> ...
> e_free:
> free_cpumask_var(sev->have_run_cpus);
> ...
> }
>
> Because free_cpumask_var() receives the mask by value, the pointer remains
> dangling. When the user later closes the VM file descriptor,
> kvm_destroy_vm() calls sev_vm_destroy().
>
> Prior to this patch, the early return on !sev_guest(kvm) prevented the second
> free. By moving free_cpumask_var() before the !sev_guest(kvm) check, won't
> we unconditionally double free the dangling pointer?
Ugh, what a pain. Ideally, free_cpumask_var() would nullify the pointer. But
for a KVM-only "fix", it's easy enough to do the mask allocation last so that
there's no need to unwind and figure out how to nullify the pointer when it's
off-"stack".
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 96b4ed220eaf..4cbd38a48c5a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -545,16 +545,16 @@ static int __sev_guest_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp,
if (ret)
goto e_free_asid;
- if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&sev->have_run_cpus, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT)) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto e_free_asid;
- }
-
/* This needs to happen after SEV/SNP firmware initialization. */
if (snp_active) {
ret = snp_guest_req_init(kvm);
if (ret)
- goto e_free;
+ goto e_free_asid;
+ }
+
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&sev->have_run_cpus, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT)) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto e_free;
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sev->regions_list);
@@ -566,7 +566,8 @@ static int __sev_guest_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp,
return 0;
e_free:
- free_cpumask_var(sev->have_run_cpus);
+ if (snp_active)
+ snp_guest_req_cleanup(kvm);
e_free_asid:
argp->error = init_args.error;
sev_asid_free(sev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 16:37 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: SEV: Fix intra-host migration cache bugs Sean Christopherson
2026-09-23 16:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: SEV: Free have_run_cpus during VM destruction even if VM is no longer SEV Sean Christopherson
2026-09-23 16:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 17:27 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-09-23 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: SEV: Do cache maintenance on the source VM during intra-host migration Sean Christopherson
2026-09-23 16:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 17:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-26 4:37 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: SEV: Fix intra-host migration cache bugs Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arQMARDUTSjbWpMX@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox