From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Peng Hao <flyingpenghao@gmail.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Guard against division by zero in adjust_lapic_timer_advance()
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 13:35:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aslQLXcK1VXSkrVo@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008090037.86931-1-flyingpeng@tencent.com>
On Thu, Oct 08, 2026, Peng Hao wrote:
> When TSC calibration fails and userspace never programs a tsc khz,
> vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz stays zero, but the lapic timer's
> software-mode expiry path still calls adjust_lapic_timer_advance()
> unconditionally on every timer expiration (unlike
> __wait_lapic_expire(), this path is not gated on tsc_scaling_ratio).
> Both the "too early" and "too late" branches do_div() by
> virtual_tsc_khz, so a zero khz crashes the host with #DE as soon as
> the timer advance drifts outside the adjust window.
>
> Bail out before either division.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <flyingpeng@tencent.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 13e32c4915e2..4dcbc66c8e07 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1991,6 +1991,9 @@ static inline void adjust_lapic_timer_advance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> abs(advance_expire_delta) < LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_MIN)
> return;
>
> + if (unlikely(!vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz))
> + return;
Ugh. I'd rather reject KVM_CREATE_VCPU, even though there is a rather surprising
amount of code in KVM that does indeed play nice with tsc_khz == 0. I don't see
how the guest can possibly function with virtual_tsc_khz==0.
vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_{shift,mult} will also be left as zero (to avoid #DE there
as well):
/* tsc_khz can be zero if TSC calibration fails */
if (user_tsc_khz == 0) {
/* set tsc_scaling_ratio to a safe value */
kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_multiplier(vcpu, kvm_caps.default_tsc_scaling_ratio);
return -1;
}
/* Compute a scale to convert nanoseconds in TSC cycles */
kvm_get_time_scale(user_tsc_khz * 1000LL, NSEC_PER_SEC,
&vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_shift,
&vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_mult);
and so nsec_to_cycles() will always return zero due to multiplying by zero. That
means things like the APIC timer will always fire immediately:
apic->lapic_timer.tscdeadline = kvm_read_l1_tsc(apic->vcpu, tscl) +
nsec_to_cycles(apic->vcpu, deadline);
The first instance of this goes back to 03ba32cae66e ("VMX: x86: handle host TSC
calibration failure"), and every "fix" since then has been to avoid #DE.
> +
> /* too early */
> if (advance_expire_delta < 0) {
> ns = -advance_expire_delta * 1000000ULL;
> --
> 2.43.7
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 9:00 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Guard against division by zero in adjust_lapic_timer_advance() Peng Hao
2026-10-08 9:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 20:35 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aslQLXcK1VXSkrVo@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=flyingpenghao@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox