Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Amirmohammad Eftekhar <amirmohammad.eftekhar@cispa.de>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] KVM: x86: Hyper-V VP-assist page reuses the KVM PV-EOI gfn_to_hva_cache, so enabling both WARNs and fails KVM_RUN
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 07:06:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atOAyUIiGLBsgsWI@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261017093016.32348-7-amirmohammad.eftekhar@cispa.de>

On Sat, Oct 17, 2026, Amirmohammad Eftekhar wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Reporting a guest self-DoS (correctness/robustness; not memory-safety, not
> guest->host).

And a KVM WARN, that's the only reason I care about "fixing" this.

> The Hyper-V VP-assist page and KVM's PV-EOI feature share a single
> gfn_to_hva_cache, vcpu->arch.pv_eoi.data:

I'm still flabbergasted that this is the case (I recently learned about this thanks
to another AI-found bug).

>  - Writing HV_X64_MSR_VP_ASSIST_PAGE arms the cache for the VP-assist page via
>    kvm_lapic_set_pv_eoi(vcpu, gfn_to_gpa(gfn) | KVM_MSR_ENABLED,
>    sizeof(struct hv_vp_assist_page))   /* hyperv.c ~1600 */
>  - kvm_hv_get_assist_page() then reads it back with that same cache and the
>    VP-assist length:
>    kvm_read_guest_cached(kvm, &vcpu->arch.pv_eoi.data,
>                          &hv_vcpu->vp_assist_page,
>                          sizeof(struct hv_vp_assist_page))  /* hyperv.c ~952 */
> 
> pv_eoi.data is the one gfn_to_hva_cache shared between the two features. A guest
> that has VP-assist enabled and then writes MSR_KVM_PV_EOI_EN (a different GPA,
> len 1) re-initializes pv_eoi.data for the 1-byte PV-EOI object while VP-assist
> stays enabled. The next kvm_hv_get_assist_page() then does a cached read of
> sizeof(struct hv_vp_assist_page) against a cache set up for len 1 -> the
> length/GPA mismatch trips the cache and KVM fails the read, surfacing as a WARN
> and a failed KVM_RUN for a guest that did nothing architecturally illegal (the
> two features are independent and both legitimately enableable).

Eh, given that no one has ever complained, and that enabling both at different
locations would probably break the guest anyways, I don't see any reason to go
out of our way to make this work.  If someone wants to clean up the Hyper-V mess,
they're more than welcome to, but for an immediate fix, I just want to prevent
KVM from tripping the WARN.

So as a stopgap (which will probably become the long-term behavior...), this?

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
index c18f45f66c24..88cc5a6ce170 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
@@ -947,6 +947,15 @@ int kvm_hv_get_assist_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!hv_vcpu || !kvm_hv_assist_page_enabled(vcpu))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
+	/*
+	 * KVM reuses its own PV EOI feature to emulate Hyper-V's EOI Assist,
+	 * and rather stupidly reuses the same MSR and cache storage.  Treat
+	 * the assist page as inaccessible if the shared state is configured
+	 * only for PV EOI's single byte of data.
+	 */
+	if (vcpu->arch.pv_eoi.data.len < sizeof(struct hv_vp_assist_page))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
 	return kvm_read_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.pv_eoi.data,
 				     &hv_vcpu->vp_assist_page, sizeof(struct hv_vp_assist_page));
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-17 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-17  9:30 [BUG] KVM: x86: Hyper-V VP-assist page reuses the KVM PV-EOI gfn_to_hva_cache, so enabling both WARNs and fails KVM_RUN Amirmohammad Eftekhar
2026-10-17 14:06 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-10-17 16:33 ` Amirmohammad Eftekhar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atOAyUIiGLBsgsWI@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=amirmohammad.eftekhar@cispa.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox