Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 18/20] KVM: selftests: Add support for per-VM ucall ops on x86
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 06:52:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <au3pwtxF9Qs97mfu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-200423@kernel.org>

On Fri, Nov 06, 2026, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] KVM: selftests: ucall_x86_ops is a host global instead of per-VM state
> --
> 
> commit 220d73be4cec0aafb094f8711c312a5a8ae361c9
> Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> 
> KVM: selftests: Add support for per-VM ucall ops on x86
> 
> This commit introduces an ops structure for x86 ucall handling so that
> different VM types, such as TDX VMs, can wire up their own do_ucall and
> get_ucall callbacks.
> 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/ucall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/ucall.c
> > index 38050c60a0670..3aec4dd46d1b2 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/ucall.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/ucall.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -26,3 +26,26 @@ void *ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  	}
> >  	return NULL;
> >  }
> > +
> > +static struct {
> > +	void (*do_ucall)(gva_t uc);
> > +	void *(*get_ucall)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > +} ucall_x86_ops = {
> > +	.do_ucall = ucall_x86_do_ucall,
> > +	.get_ucall = ucall_x86_get_ucall,
> > +};
> > +
> > +void ucall_arch_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, gpa_t mmio_gpa)
> > +{
> > +	sync_global_to_guest(vm, ucall_x86_ops);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void ucall_arch_do_ucall(gva_t uc)
> > +{
> > +	ucall_x86_ops.do_ucall(uc);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void *ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > +	return ucall_x86_ops.get_ucall(vcpu);
> > +}
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> As reported by Sashiko on v15 [1], ucall_x86_ops in
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/ucall.c is defined as a single
> process-wide static variable on the host rather than per-VM state.
> 
> While ucall_arch_init() uses sync_global_to_guest(vm, ucall_x86_ops) to copy
> the structure into each guest VM's private address space for guest-side
> ucall_arch_do_ucall() execution, ucall_arch_get_ucall() executes on the host
> and dispatches through the single host-side ucall_x86_ops.get_ucall pointer
> instead of per-VM state associated with vcpu->vm.
> 
> In the following patch ("KVM: selftests: Add support for TDX ucalls, via
> TDVMCALL_REPORT_FATAL_ERROR"), ucall_arch_init() mutates the host
> ucall_x86_ops in place when is_tdx_vm(vm) is true without restoring the
> default x86 callbacks when is_tdx_vm(vm) is false. If a selftest process
> creates a TDX VM via __vm_create() -> ucall_init() -> ucall_arch_init() and
> concurrently or subsequently creates and runs a non-TDX VM, won't the
> non-TDX VM inherit the TDX ucall callbacks both in guest memory and on the
> host in get_ucall() -> ucall_arch_get_ucall()?

/facepalm

I over-engineered this.  OMG, and I complete forgot about write_guest_global(),
which I added specifically to make ucalls multi-VM friendly, i.e. we can even
make the initialization thread safe.  Hilarious.

We can either do:

  void (*x86_do_ucall)(gva_t uc);
  
  void ucall_arch_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, gpa_t mmio_gpa)
  {
    	write_guest_global(vm, x86_do_ucall, is_tdx_vm(vm) ? ucall_tdx_do_ucall :
  							     ucall_x86_do_ucall);
  }
  
  void ucall_arch_do_ucall(gva_t uc)
  {
  	x86_do_ucall(uc);
  }
  
  void *ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
  	if (is_tdx_vm(vcpu->vm))
  		return ucall_tdx_get_ucall(vcpu);
  
  	return ucall_x86_get_ucall(vcpu);
  }
  
or:

  static bool ucall_is_tdx_vm;
  
  void ucall_arch_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, gpa_t mmio_gpa)
  {
  	write_guest_global(vm, ucall_is_tdx_vm, is_tdx_vm(vm));
  }
  
  void ucall_arch_do_ucall(gva_t uc)
  {
  	if (ucall_is_tdx_vm)
  		ucall_tdx_do_ucall(uc);
  	else
  		ucall_x86_do_ucall(uc);
  }
  
  void *ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
  	if (is_tdx_vm(vcpu->vm))
  		return ucall_tdx_get_ucall(vcpu);
  
  	return ucall_x86_get_ucall(vcpu);
  }

or a very slight variant on option #2 to make the paths visually similar:

  static bool ucall_is_tdx_vm;
  
  void ucall_arch_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, gpa_t mmio_gpa)
  {
  	write_guest_global(vm, ucall_is_tdx_vm, is_tdx_vm(vm));
  }
  
  void ucall_arch_do_ucall(gva_t uc)
  {
  	if (ucall_is_tdx_vm)
  		return ucall_tdx_do_ucall(uc);
  
  	return ucall_x86_do_ucall(uc);
  }
  
  void *ucall_arch_get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
  	if (is_tdx_vm(vcpu->vm))
  		return ucall_tdx_get_ucall(vcpu);
  
  	return ucall_x86_get_ucall(vcpu);
  }

I strongly vote for the simple flag, with a preference for the double-return
variant.  I'm going to violate my own "don't do in-reply-to patches" rule and
post a v16.1 patch in response, to see if that's trigger another round of Sashiko
review.

P.S. I'VE GOT THE POWER:

# ./tdx_vm_test
Random seed: 0x26085169
TAP version 13
1..1
# Starting 1 tests from 1 test cases.
#  RUN           global.verify_td_lifecycle ...
#            OK  global.verify_td_lifecycle
ok 1 global.verify_td_lifecycle
# PASSED: 1 / 1 tests passed.
# Totals: pass:1 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-05 23:46 [PATCH v16 00/20] TDX KVM selftests Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 01/20] KVM: selftests: Add macros to simplify creating VM shapes for non-default types Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 02/20] KVM: selftests: Update kvm_init_vm_address_properties() for TDX Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 03/20] KVM: selftests: Initialize the TDX VM Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 04/20] KVM: selftests: Expose segment definitions to assembly files Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 05/20] tools: include: Add kbuild.h for assembly structure offsets Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 06/20] KVM: selftests: Introduce structures for TDX guest boot parameters Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 07/20] KVM: selftests: Add TDX boot code Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 08/20] KVM: selftests: Expose functions to get default sregs values Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 09/20] KVM: selftests: Set up TDX boot code region Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 10/20] KVM: selftests: Set up TDX boot parameters region Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 11/20] KVM: selftests: Require guest_memfd for TDX VMs Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 12/20] KVM: selftests: Call KVM_TDX_INIT_VCPU when creating a new TDX vcpu Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 13/20] KVM: selftests: Load per-vCPU guest stack in TDX boot parameters Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 14/20] KVM: selftests: Set entry point for TDX guest code Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:46 ` [PATCH v16 15/20] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to init TDX memory and finalize VM Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:47 ` [PATCH v16 16/20] KVM: selftests: Load private memory and finalize TDX VM in kvm_arch_vm_finalize_vcpus() Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:47 ` [PATCH v16 17/20] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to issue TDVMCALLs from the TDX vm Lisa Wang
2026-11-05 23:47 ` [PATCH v16 18/20] KVM: selftests: Add support for per-VM ucall ops on x86 Lisa Wang
2026-11-06  0:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 14:52     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-11-06 16:47   ` [PATCH v16.1] KVM: selftests: Add support for TDX ucalls, via TDVMCALL_REPORT_FATAL_ERROR Sean Christopherson
2026-11-05 23:47 ` [PATCH v16 19/20] " Lisa Wang
2026-11-06  0:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 23:47 ` [PATCH v16 20/20] KVM: selftests: Add TDX lifecycle test Lisa Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=au3pwtxF9Qs97mfu@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wyihan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox