From: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
Ankit Soni <Ankit.Soni@amd.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
John Starks <dev@jstarks.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 15/18] iommufd: Persist iommu hardware pagetables for live update
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 03:24:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auVatSyjUkYAoFR4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98fe2806-d4a3-4bee-9324-d1862b2a2cb4@linux.intel.com>
On Sat, Oct 31, 2026 at 10:46:56AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
>On 10/25/2026 10:19 AM, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
>>From: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
>>
>>Register iommufd with the LUO framework and implement the preserve and
>>unpreserve ops to save marked HWPTs.
>>
>>To make sure mappings do not change during preserved state, add a
>>liveupdate_immutable flag to IOAS. When an HWPT is preserved, its IOAS
>>is marked immutable and any map/unmap attempts will fail with -EBUSY.
>>This is synchronized using the domains_rwsem to prevent races with
>>concurrent mapping operations.
>>
>>The preserve callback iterates over the marked HWPTs, verifies that the
>>backing memory pages are preserved, and calls iommu_preserve_domain() to
>>preserve the associated IOMMU domain.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
>>Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
>>---
>> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>> drivers/iommu/iommufd/io_pagetable.c | 24 ++
>> drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h | 16 ++
>> drivers/iommu/iommufd/liveupdate.c | 327 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c | 10 +-
>> include/linux/kho/abi/iommufd.h | 56 ++++
>> 6 files changed, 433 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/kho/abi/iommufd.h
>>
>
>[...]
>>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/liveupdate.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/liveupdate.c
>>index 5fb491ff3a3d..828203d7254c 100644
>>--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/liveupdate.c
>>+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/liveupdate.c
>>@@ -9,9 +9,28 @@
>> #include <linux/file.h>
>> #include <linux/iommufd.h>
>>+#include <linux/kexec_handover.h>
>>+#include <linux/kho/abi/iommufd.h>
>> #include <linux/liveupdate.h>
>>+#include <linux/iommu-liveupdate.h>
>>+#include <linux/mm.h>
>>+#include <linux/pci.h>
>> #include "iommufd_private.h"
>>+#include "io_pagetable.h"
>>+
>>+static u32 iopt_inc_num_preserved_domains(struct io_pagetable *iopt)
>>+{
>>+ guard(rwsem_write)(&iopt->domains_rwsem);
>>+ return ++iopt->num_preserved_domains;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static void iopt_dec_num_preserved_domains(struct io_pagetable *iopt)
>>+{
>>+ guard(rwsem_write)(&iopt->domains_rwsem);
>>+ if (!WARN_ON(!iopt->num_preserved_domains))
>>+ iopt->num_preserved_domains--;
>>+}
>> int iommufd_hwpt_liveupdate_mark_preserve(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd)
>> {
>>@@ -70,3 +89,311 @@ int iommufd_hwpt_liveupdate_mark_preserve(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd)
>> iommufd_put_object(ictx, &hwpt->common.obj);
>> return rc;
>> }
>>+
>>+static int iopt_area_validate_file_pages(struct iopt_area *area)
>>+{
>>+ unsigned long last_index = iopt_area_last_index(area);
>>+ unsigned long index = iopt_area_index(area);
>>+ unsigned int page_offset = area->page_offset;
>>+ struct iopt_pages *pages = area->pages;
>>+ unsigned long iova = iopt_area_iova(area);
>>+
>>+ guard(mutex)(&pages->mutex);
>>+ if (WARN_ON(!area->storage_domain))
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+
>>+ while (index <= last_index) {
>>+ phys_addr_t phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(area->storage_domain,
>>+ iova) - page_offset;
>
>iommu_iova_to_phys() returns 0 when there is no underlying DMA
>translation. It would be better to check for !phys and return -EINVAL
>before passing it to page_folio():
Agreed. I will also move the page_offset subtraction after the check.
>
> if (!phys)
> return -EINVAL;
>
>>+ struct folio *folio = page_folio(pfn_to_page(PHYS_PFN(phys)));
>>+
>>+ if (folio->mapping != pages->file->f_mapping)
>>+ return -EINVAL;
>>+
>>+ iova += PAGE_SIZE - page_offset;
>
>This walks a full page table per 4K page size, right? Isn't it slow for
>large mappings? Why not jump ahead by folio_size()?
Yes. When filling a domain, iommufd reuses pages that are already pinned
(by an access or another domain). If the memfd was punched in between,
an old page from a different folio can sit in the middle of a folio
range, and jumping by folio_size() would skip it. I will add a comment.
Also see batch_from_domain() implementation, it also does a similar page
walk.
In parallel, I sent a proposal for memfd to block or track hole punch,
so this walk can be skipped. It can be a follow up.
>
>>+ page_offset = 0;
>>+ index++;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ return 0;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static int iopt_validate_preserved_memory(struct io_pagetable *iopt,
>>+ struct liveupdate_session *s)
>>+{
>>+ struct iopt_area *area;
>>+ int ret = 0;
>>+
>>+ down_read(&iopt->iova_rwsem);
>>+ for (area = iopt_area_iter_first(iopt, 0, ULONG_MAX); area;
>>+ area = iopt_area_iter_next(area, 0, ULONG_MAX)) {
>>+ struct iopt_pages *pages = area->pages;
>>+
>>+ if (!pages)
>>+ continue;
>>+
>>+ /* Only allow file based mapping */
>>+ if (pages->type != IOPT_ADDRESS_FILE) {
>>+ ret = -EINVAL;
>>+ break;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ /* Make sure that the file was preserved. */
>>+ ret = liveupdate_get_token_outgoing(s, pages->file, NULL);
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ break;
>>+
>>+ /*
>>+ * Make sure the mapped pages are still associated with the
>>+ * preserved memfd.
>>+ */
>>+ ret = iopt_area_validate_file_pages(area);
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ break;
>>+ }
>>+ up_read(&iopt->iova_rwsem);
>>+
>>+ return ret;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static int iommufd_preserve_hwpt(struct iommufd_hwpt_paging *hwpt,
>>+ struct iommufd_hwpt_ser *hwpt_ser,
>>+ struct liveupdate_session *session)
>>+{
>>+ struct iommu_domain_ser *domain_ser;
>>+ int rc;
>>+
>>+ /*
>>+ * Make IOAS immutable so the DMA mappings do not change while
>>+ * the HWPT is preserved. Since one IOAS can have multiple
>>+ * HWPTs, if an error occurs this call needs to make the IOAS
>>+ * mutable again if it was the one that made it immutable.
>>+ */
>>+ if (iopt_inc_num_preserved_domains(&hwpt->ioas->iopt) == 1) {
>>+ rc = iopt_validate_preserved_memory(&hwpt->ioas->iopt, session);
>>+ if (rc)
>>+ goto err;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ hwpt_ser->size = sizeof(*hwpt_ser);
>>+ hwpt_ser->token = hwpt->liveupdate_token;
>>+
>>+ rc = iommu_preserve_domain(hwpt->common.domain, &domain_ser);
>>+ if (rc < 0)
>>+ goto err;
>>+
>>+ hwpt_ser->domain_ser_phys = virt_to_phys(domain_ser);
>>+ return 0;
>>+
>>+err:
>>+ iopt_dec_num_preserved_domains(&hwpt->ioas->iopt);
>>+ return rc;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static void _iommufd_unpreserve(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
>>+ struct iommufd_ser *ser)
>>+{
>>+ struct iommufd_hwpt_paging *hwpt;
>>+ struct iommufd_object *obj;
>>+ unsigned long index;
>>+
>>+ xa_lock(&ictx->objects);
>>+ xa_for_each_marked(&ictx->objects, index, obj, IOMMUFD_OBJ_LIVEUPDATE_MARK) {
>>+ if (obj->type != IOMMUFD_OBJ_HWPT_PAGING)
>>+ continue;
>>+
>>+ hwpt = to_hwpt_paging(container_of(obj, struct iommufd_hw_pagetable, obj));
>>+ if (!hwpt->liveupdate_preserved)
>>+ continue;
>>+
>>+ xa_unlock(&ictx->objects);
>>+
>>+ iommu_unpreserve_domain(hwpt->common.domain);
>>+ iopt_dec_num_preserved_domains(&hwpt->ioas->iopt);
>>+
>>+ hwpt->liveupdate_preserved = false;
>>+ iommufd_put_object(ictx, obj);
>>+
>>+ xa_lock(&ictx->objects);
>>+ }
>>+ xa_unlock(&ictx->objects);
>>+
>>+ kho_unpreserve_free(ser);
>>+}
>>+
>>+static int iommufd_liveupdate_preserve(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
>>+{
>>+ struct iommufd_ctx *ictx;
>>+ struct iommufd_hwpt_paging *hwpt;
>>+ struct iommufd_ser *iommufd_ser;
>>+ struct iommufd_object *obj;
>>+ unsigned int num_hwpts;
>>+ unsigned long index;
>>+ unsigned int i;
>>+ void *mem;
>>+ int rc;
>>+
>>+ ictx = iommufd_ctx_from_file(args->file);
>>+ if (IS_ERR(ictx))
>>+ return PTR_ERR(ictx);
>>+
>>+ mutex_lock(&ictx->liveupdate_mutex);
>>+
>>+ /* Count the number of HWPTs to preserve */
>>+ num_hwpts = 0;
>>+ xa_lock(&ictx->objects);
>>+ xa_for_each_marked(&ictx->objects, index, obj, IOMMUFD_OBJ_LIVEUPDATE_MARK) {
>>+ if (obj->type != IOMMUFD_OBJ_HWPT_PAGING)
>>+ continue;
>>+
>>+ hwpt = to_hwpt_paging(container_of(obj, struct iommufd_hw_pagetable, obj));
>>+ if (!hwpt->common.domain) {
>>+ rc = -EINVAL;
>>+ xa_unlock(&ictx->objects);
>>+ goto out_unlock;
>>+ }
>>+ num_hwpts++;
>>+ }
>>+ xa_unlock(&ictx->objects);
>>+
>>+ mem = kho_alloc_preserve(struct_size(iommufd_ser,
>>+ hwpt_array, num_hwpts));
>>+ if (IS_ERR(mem)) {
>>+ rc = PTR_ERR(mem);
>>+ goto out_unlock;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ iommufd_ser = mem;
>>+ iommufd_ser->size = sizeof(*iommufd_ser);
>>+
>>+ /* Preserve HWPTs */
>>+ i = 0;
>>+ xa_lock(&ictx->objects);
>>+ xa_for_each_marked(&ictx->objects, index, obj, IOMMUFD_OBJ_LIVEUPDATE_MARK) {
>>+ if (obj->type != IOMMUFD_OBJ_HWPT_PAGING)
>>+ continue;
>>+
>>+ if (!iommufd_lock_obj(obj)) {
>>+ rc = -ENOENT;
>>+ xa_unlock(&ictx->objects);
>>+ goto out_unpreserve;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ /*
>>+ * HWPT is locked so it will not be destroyed. The xarray lock
>>+ * can be released here before preserving the HWPT.
>>+ */
>>+ xa_unlock(&ictx->objects);
>>+ hwpt = to_hwpt_paging(container_of(obj, struct iommufd_hw_pagetable, obj));
>>+ rc = iommufd_preserve_hwpt(hwpt, &iommufd_ser->hwpt_array[i++], args->session);
>>+ if (rc) {
>>+ iommufd_put_object(ictx, obj);
>>+ goto out_unpreserve;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ /*
>>+ * Mark the HWPT as successfully preserved. This is distinct
>>+ * from IOMMUFD_OBJ_LIVEUPDATE_MARK, which only indicates the
>>+ * userspace intent to preserve.
>>+ */
>>+ hwpt->liveupdate_preserved = true;
>
>Can userspace re-mark an already-preserved HWPT with a new token? It
>seems that mark_preserve() doesn't check hwpt->liveupdate_preserved.
>Would it help to simply return -EBUSY from mark_preserve() once
>hwpt->liveupdate_preserved is set?
Yes, I will handle this case.
>
>>+ xa_lock(&ictx->objects);
>>+ }
>>+ xa_unlock(&ictx->objects);
>>+
>>+ /* Store the actual number of HWPTs that are preserved */
>>+ iommufd_ser->num_hwpts = i;
>>+
>>+ args->serialized_data = virt_to_phys(iommufd_ser);
>>+ mutex_unlock(&ictx->liveupdate_mutex);
>>+ iommufd_ctx_put(ictx);
>>+ return 0;
>>+
>>+out_unpreserve:
>>+ _iommufd_unpreserve(ictx, iommufd_ser);
>>+out_unlock:
>>+ mutex_unlock(&ictx->liveupdate_mutex);
>>+ iommufd_ctx_put(ictx);
>>+ return rc;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static void iommufd_liveupdate_unpreserve(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
>>+{
>>+ struct iommufd_ctx *ictx;
>>+
>>+ ictx = iommufd_ctx_from_file(args->file);
>>+ if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(ictx)))
>>+ return;
>>+
>>+ mutex_lock(&ictx->liveupdate_mutex);
>>+ _iommufd_unpreserve(ictx, phys_to_virt(args->serialized_data));
>>+ mutex_unlock(&ictx->liveupdate_mutex);
>>+
>>+ iommufd_ctx_put(ictx);
>>+}
>[...]
>
>Thanks,
>baolu
Thanks,
Sami
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-31 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-25 2:19 [PATCH v6 00/18] iommu: Add live update state preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] iommu: Implement IOMMU Live update FLB callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] iommu/pages: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve/restore iommu pages Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-30 1:26 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-30 19:41 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] iommupt: Implement preserve/unpreserve/restore callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-30 3:07 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-30 19:42 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] iommu: Implement IOMMU domain preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-30 4:24 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] iommu: Implement device and IOMMU HW preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-30 5:12 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-31 1:45 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-31 3:04 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-31 3:39 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] iommu/vt-d: Implement device and iommu preserve/unpreserve ops Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-28 1:51 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-28 3:10 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] iommu/vt-d: Clear unpreserved context entries during shutdown Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-28 3:18 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-29 0:34 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-29 3:18 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-29 22:00 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] iommu: Add APIs to get iommu and device preserved state Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-30 6:03 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-31 1:55 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] iommu/vt-d: Combine disable_dmar_iommu() and free_dmar_iommu() Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-28 6:01 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-29 0:33 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] iommu/vt-d: Restore IOMMU state and reclaimed domain ids Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-28 7:14 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-29 0:32 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] iommu/vt-d: Preserve PASID table of preserved device Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-29 7:42 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] iommu: Restore and reattach preserved domains to devices Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] iommu/vt-d: Handle reattach of the restored domain Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-29 8:28 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-29 22:34 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-29 23:38 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-30 19:39 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] iommufd: Implement ioctl to mark HWPT for preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-30 7:20 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-31 1:48 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] iommufd: Persist iommu hardware pagetables for live update Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-31 2:46 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-31 3:24 ` Samiullah Khawaja [this message]
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] iommufd: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve a vfio cdev Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-31 3:31 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-31 3:57 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] vfio/pci: Preserve the iommufd state of the " Samiullah Khawaja
2026-10-25 2:19 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] iommufd/selftest: Add test to verify iommufd preservation Samiullah Khawaja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auVatSyjUkYAoFR4@google.com \
--to=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=Ankit.Soni@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dev@jstarks.net \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhuyifei@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox