From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/23] KVM: Destroy memslots immediately after mmu_notifiers are unregistered
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 08:08:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aui1bOy-PwIgKOFk@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auitWWkOopYYbBH3@google.com>
+Ritesh as well
On Mon, Nov 02, 2026, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +Gautam and PPC lists/maintainers
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2026, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> > - [Medium] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: rmap_nested memory leak in kvmhv_release_all_nested()
> > --
> >
> > commit 9c25a1b4a76e8526eb8a2b11e1b9e63893b0de80
> > Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> >
> > KVM: Destroy memslots immediately after mmu_notifiers are unregistered
> >
> > This commit replaces active memslots with an empty memslot set and frees all
> > memslots immediately after unregistering the MMU notifier in kvm_destroy_vm(),
> > prior to calling kvm_arch_destroy_vm().
> >
> > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > > index fa548b12228ff..2eda12a52bf4b 100644
> > > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > @@ -1310,12 +1329,10 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> > > kvm->mn_active_invalidate_count = 0;
> > > else
> > > WARN_ON(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress);
> > > + kvm_destroy_memslots(kvm);
> > > +
> > > kvm_arch_destroy_vm(kvm);
> > > kvm_destroy_devices(kvm);
> > > - for (i = 0; i < kvm_arch_nr_memslot_as_ids(kvm); i++) {
> > > - kvm_free_memslots(kvm, &kvm->__memslots[i][0]);
> > > - kvm_free_memslots(kvm, &kvm->__memslots[i][1]);
> > > - }
> >
> > [Severity: Medium]
> > Does hoisting kvm_destroy_memslots() above kvm_arch_destroy_vm() leak
> > struct rmap_nested allocations in slot->arch.rmap on PowerPC Book3S HV when
> > destroying a VM with nested virtualization enabled?
>
> I don't think so? Patch 3[*], "KVM: PPC: Flush/zap all memslots on kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all()",
> should free the rmaps in response to kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(). From what I
> can tell, the page tables have to be in radix mode, and so the rmaps are freed via:
>
> kvmppc_radix_flush_memslot()
> |
> -> kvmppc_unmap_pte()
> |
> -> kvmhv_remove_nest_rmap_range()
> |
> -> kvmhv_remove_nest_rmap_list()
>
> And if that doesn't work, it means memslot deletion on an active VM is completely
> broken.
>
> However, it means the memslot code in kvmhv_release_all_nested() is dead code, so
> this as follow-up to patch 3? Or maybe folded in?
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
> index a6ff42d7666c..27985210f972 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c
> @@ -802,8 +802,6 @@ void kvmhv_release_all_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
> int lpid;
> struct kvm_nested_guest *gp;
> struct kvm_nested_guest *freelist = NULL;
> - struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> - int srcu_idx, bkt;
>
> spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> idr_for_each_entry(&kvm->arch.kvm_nested_guest_idr, gp, lpid) {
> @@ -820,11 +818,6 @@ void kvmhv_release_all_nested(struct kvm *kvm)
> freelist = gp->next;
> kvmhv_release_nested(gp);
> }
> -
> - srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> - kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, bkt, kvm_memslots(kvm))
> - kvmhv_free_memslot_nest_rmap(memslot);
> - srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, srcu_idx);
> }
>
> /* caller must hold gp->tlb_lock */
>
>
> [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261030212112.2598640-4-seanjc@google.com
>
> > In virt/kvm/kvm_main.c, kvm_destroy_memslots() replaces kvm->memslots[i]
> > with kvm_empty_memslots and frees each memslot via
> > kvm_free_memslot() -> kvm_arch_free_memslot() -> kvmppc_core_free_memslot_hv()
> > in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c:
> >
> > static void kvmppc_core_free_memslot_hv(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> > {
> > vfree(slot->arch.rmap);
> > slot->arch.rmap = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > which frees the slot->arch.rmap array without freeing the linked
> > struct rmap_nested entries.
> >
> > Previously, those entries were freed before memslot destruction via
> > kvm_arch_destroy_vm() -> kvmppc_core_destroy_vm_hv() ->
> > kvmhv_release_all_nested() in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c:
> >
> > srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> > kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, bkt, kvm_memslots(kvm))
> > kvmhv_free_memslot_nest_rmap(memslot);
> > srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, srcu_idx);
> >
> > With kvm_destroy_memslots() running before kvm_arch_destroy_vm(),
> > kvm_memslots(kvm) now returns kvm_empty_memslots and the memslots have
> > already been freed when kvmhv_release_all_nested() runs, so
> > kvmhv_free_memslot_nest_rmap() is never called. Any struct rmap_nested
> > entries remaining in slot->arch.rmap at teardown (for example, when
> > KVMPPC_SECURE_INIT_DONE causes kvmppc_radix_flush_memslot() to return early,
> > or when 4KB PTEs were replaced by a huge page in kvmppc_unmap_free_pte())
> > will be leaked.
> >
> > --
> > Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261030212112.2598640-1-seanjc@google.com?part=12
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 21:20 [PATCH v4 00/23] KVM: Fix+harden against bad uaccess using dying VM Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] KVM: Reject user accesses to guest memory if current->mm != kvm->mm Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] KVM: nVMX: Don't force a full nested VM-Exit when destroying a vCPU Sean Christopherson
2026-11-02 22:03 ` Jim Mattson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] KVM: PPC: Flush/zap all memslots on kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all() Sean Christopherson
2026-11-03 17:21 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] KVM: x86: Drop dead check on an existing memslot not having any pages Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] KVM: WARN and error out if memslot update encounters existing slot with no pages Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] KVM: x86: Unmap VMAs for KVM-internal memslots when the memslot is freed Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] KVM: x86: Delete non-SMM internal memslot if creating SMM memslot fails Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] KVM: x86: Process all address spaces when deleting internal memslot Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] KVM: x86: Re-queue APICv update request if inhibiting APIC access page fails Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] KVM: x86: Map a separate VMA for each address space for internal memslots Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 22:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 21:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] KVM: Disallow setting memslots when the VM is being destroyed Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] KVM: Destroy memslots immediately after mmu_notifiers are unregistered Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 23:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 15:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-11-02 16:08 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-11-03 18:08 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] KVM: WARN if KVM attempts to do guest-related uaccess with "wrong" process Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] KVM: WARN and reject guest-based uaccess if VM is dying Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] KVM: Pre-check uaccesses in KVM's APIs to read/write guest memory Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] KVM: VMX: Explicility free vmcs01, not the current VMCS, in vCPU free paths Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] KVM: nVMX: Don't explicitly VMCLEAR+free() vmcs01's shadow VMCS when freeing vCPU Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] KVM: nVMX: Cancel the nested VMX Preemption Timer's hrtimer in free_nested() Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] KVM: Add lockdep-only APIs to query and assert that a vCPU is unreachable Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] KVM: VMX: Explicitly remove dying vCPUs from the PI wakeup list Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] KVM: nVMX: Don't switch to vmcs01 when freeing a vCPU Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] KVM: nVMX: Don't load+put the vCPU when freeing nested state for a dying vCPU Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 21:21 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] KVM: x86: Rename __x86_set_memory_region() => x86_set_internal_memslot() Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aui1bOy-PwIgKOFk@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox