* [PATCH v7 1/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_map_unmap VM test case
2024-11-07 14:10 [PATCH v7 0/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add ucontrol memory selftests Christoph Schlameuss
@ 2024-11-07 14:10 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2024-11-07 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_skey " Christoph Schlameuss
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Schlameuss @ 2024-11-07 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm
Cc: linux-s390, linux-kselftest, Paolo Bonzini, Shuah Khan,
Christian Borntraeger, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda,
David Hildenbrand, schlameuss
Add a test case verifying basic running and interaction of ucontrol VMs.
Fill the segment and page tables for allocated memory and map memory on
first access.
* uc_map_unmap
Store and load data to mapped and unmapped memory and use pic segment
translation handling to map memory on access.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 144 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
index f257beec1430..3e649b12a0b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
@@ -16,7 +16,11 @@
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/sizes.h>
+#define PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION 0x10
+
#define VM_MEM_SIZE (4 * SZ_1M)
+#define VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE (2 * SZ_1M)
+#define VM_MEM_MAX_M ((VM_MEM_SIZE + VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE) / SZ_1M)
/* so directly declare capget to check caps without libcap */
int capget(cap_user_header_t header, cap_user_data_t data);
@@ -58,6 +62,23 @@ asm("test_gprs_asm:\n"
" j 0b\n"
);
+/* Test program manipulating memory */
+extern char test_mem_asm[];
+asm("test_mem_asm:\n"
+ "xgr %r0, %r0\n"
+
+ "0:\n"
+ " ahi %r0,1\n"
+ " st %r1,0(%r5,%r6)\n"
+
+ " xgr %r1,%r1\n"
+ " l %r1,0(%r5,%r6)\n"
+ " ahi %r0,1\n"
+ " diag 0,0,0x44\n"
+
+ " j 0b\n"
+);
+
FIXTURE(uc_kvm)
{
struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block;
@@ -67,6 +88,7 @@ FIXTURE(uc_kvm)
uintptr_t base_hva;
uintptr_t code_hva;
int kvm_run_size;
+ vm_paddr_t pgd;
void *vm_mem;
int vcpu_fd;
int kvm_fd;
@@ -116,7 +138,7 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(uc_kvm)
self->base_gpa = 0;
self->code_gpa = self->base_gpa + (3 * SZ_1M);
- self->vm_mem = aligned_alloc(SZ_1M, VM_MEM_SIZE);
+ self->vm_mem = aligned_alloc(SZ_1M, VM_MEM_MAX_M * SZ_1M);
ASSERT_NE(NULL, self->vm_mem) TH_LOG("malloc failed %u", errno);
self->base_hva = (uintptr_t)self->vm_mem;
self->code_hva = self->base_hva - self->base_gpa + self->code_gpa;
@@ -222,6 +244,60 @@ TEST(uc_cap_hpage)
close(kvm_fd);
}
+/* calculate host virtual addr from guest physical addr */
+static void *gpa2hva(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self, u64 gpa)
+{
+ return (void *)(self->base_hva - self->base_gpa + gpa);
+}
+
+/* map / make additional memory available */
+static int uc_map_ext(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self, u64 vcpu_addr, u64 length)
+{
+ struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping map = {
+ .user_addr = (u64)gpa2hva(self, vcpu_addr),
+ .vcpu_addr = vcpu_addr,
+ .length = length,
+ };
+ pr_info("ucas map %p %p 0x%llx",
+ (void *)map.user_addr, (void *)map.vcpu_addr, map.length);
+ return ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP, &map);
+}
+
+/* unmap previously mapped memory */
+static int uc_unmap_ext(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self, u64 vcpu_addr, u64 length)
+{
+ struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping map = {
+ .user_addr = (u64)gpa2hva(self, vcpu_addr),
+ .vcpu_addr = vcpu_addr,
+ .length = length,
+ };
+ pr_info("ucas unmap %p %p 0x%llx",
+ (void *)map.user_addr, (void *)map.vcpu_addr, map.length);
+ return ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP, &map);
+}
+
+/* handle ucontrol exit by mapping the accessed segment */
+static void uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
+{
+ struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
+ u64 seg_addr;
+ int rc;
+
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
+ switch (run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code) {
+ case PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION:
+ seg_addr = run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code & ~(SZ_1M - 1);
+ pr_info("ucontrol pic segment translation 0x%llx, mapping segment 0x%lx\n",
+ run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code, seg_addr);
+ /* map / make additional memory available */
+ rc = uc_map_ext(self, seg_addr, SZ_1M);
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, rc);
+ break;
+ default:
+ TEST_FAIL("UNEXPECTED PGM CODE %d", run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code);
+ }
+}
+
/* verify SIEIC exit
* * fail on codes not expected in the test cases
*/
@@ -255,6 +331,12 @@ static bool uc_handle_exit(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
switch (run->exit_reason) {
+ case KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL:
+ /** check program interruption code
+ * handle page fault --> ucas map
+ */
+ uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(self);
+ break;
case KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC:
return uc_handle_sieic(self);
default:
@@ -286,6 +368,67 @@ static void uc_assert_diag44(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0x440000, sie_block->ipb);
}
+TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_map_unmap)
+{
+ struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;
+ struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
+ const u64 disp = 1;
+ int rc;
+
+ /* copy test_mem_asm to code_hva / code_gpa */
+ TH_LOG("copy code %p to vm mapped memory %p / %p",
+ &test_mem_asm, (void *)self->code_hva, (void *)self->code_gpa);
+ memcpy((void *)self->code_hva, &test_mem_asm, PAGE_SIZE);
+
+ /* DAT disabled + 64 bit mode */
+ run->psw_mask = 0x0000000180000000ULL;
+ run->psw_addr = self->code_gpa;
+
+ /* set register content for test_mem_asm to access not mapped memory*/
+ sync_regs->gprs[1] = 0x55;
+ sync_regs->gprs[5] = self->base_gpa;
+ sync_regs->gprs[6] = VM_MEM_SIZE + disp;
+ run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
+
+ /* run and expect to fail with ucontrol pic segment translation */
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+ ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION, run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code);
+ ASSERT_EQ(self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE, run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code);
+
+ /* fail to map memory with not segment aligned address */
+ rc = uc_map_ext(self, self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE + disp, VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE);
+ ASSERT_GT(0, rc)
+ TH_LOG("ucas map for non segment address should fail but didn't; "
+ "result %d not expected, %s", rc, strerror(errno));
+
+ /* map / make additional memory available */
+ rc = uc_map_ext(self, self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE, VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, rc)
+ TH_LOG("ucas map result %d not expected, %s", rc, strerror(errno));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
+ uc_assert_diag44(self);
+
+ /* assert registers and memory are in expected state */
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x55, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x55, *(u32 *)gpa2hva(self, self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE + disp));
+
+ /* unmap and run loop again */
+ rc = uc_unmap_ext(self, self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE, VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, rc)
+ TH_LOG("ucas unmap result %d not expected, %s", rc, strerror(errno));
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+ ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
+ ASSERT_EQ(PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION, run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code);
+ /* handle ucontrol exit and remap memory after previous map and unmap */
+ ASSERT_EQ(true, uc_handle_exit(self));
+}
+
TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_gprs)
{
struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH v7 2/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_skey VM test case
2024-11-07 14:10 [PATCH v7 0/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add ucontrol memory selftests Christoph Schlameuss
2024-11-07 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_map_unmap VM test case Christoph Schlameuss
@ 2024-11-07 14:10 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2024-11-08 9:16 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2024-11-07 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Verify reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs Christoph Schlameuss
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Schlameuss @ 2024-11-07 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm
Cc: linux-s390, linux-kselftest, Paolo Bonzini, Shuah Khan,
Christian Borntraeger, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda,
David Hildenbrand, schlameuss
Add a test case manipulating s390 storage keys from within the ucontrol
VM.
Storage key instruction (ISKE, SSKE and RRBE) intercepts and
Keyless-subset facility are disabled on first use, where the skeys are
setup by KVM in non ucontrol VMs.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h | 6 +
.../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
index 481bd2fd6a32..33fef6fd9617 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
@@ -32,4 +32,10 @@ static inline void cpu_relax(void)
barrier();
}
+/* Get the instruction length */
+static inline int insn_length(unsigned char code)
+{
+ return ((((int)code + 64) >> 7) + 1) << 1;
+}
+
#endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
index 3e649b12a0b9..fe5c0d3aabbc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
@@ -79,6 +79,33 @@ asm("test_mem_asm:\n"
" j 0b\n"
);
+/* Test program manipulating storage keys */
+extern char test_skey_asm[];
+asm("test_skey_asm:\n"
+ "xgr %r0, %r0\n"
+
+ "0:\n"
+ " ahi %r0,1\n"
+ " st %r1,0(%r5,%r6)\n"
+
+ " iske %r1,%r6\n"
+ " ahi %r0,1\n"
+ " diag 0,0,0x44\n"
+
+ " sske %r1,%r6\n"
+ " xgr %r1,%r1\n"
+ " iske %r1,%r6\n"
+ " ahi %r0,1\n"
+ " diag 0,0,0x44\n"
+
+ " rrbe %r1,%r6\n"
+ " iske %r1,%r6\n"
+ " ahi %r0,1\n"
+ " diag 0,0,0x44\n"
+
+ " j 0b\n"
+);
+
FIXTURE(uc_kvm)
{
struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block;
@@ -298,8 +325,49 @@ static void uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
}
}
-/* verify SIEIC exit
+/*
+ * Disable skey intercepts and rewind last instruction
+ * (KVM would init the skeys here)
+ */
+static void uc_skey_enable(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
+{
+ struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = self->sie_block;
+ int ilen = insn_length(sie_block->ipa >> 8);
+ struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
+
+ /* disable KSS */
+ sie_block->cpuflags &= ~CPUSTAT_KSS;
+ /* disable skey inst interception */
+ sie_block->ictl &= ~(ICTL_ISKE | ICTL_SSKE | ICTL_RRBE);
+
+ /* rewind to reexecute intercepted instruction */
+ run->psw_addr = run->psw_addr - ilen;
+ pr_info("rewind guest addr to 0x%.16llx\n", run->psw_addr);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Handle the instruction intercept
+ * Returns if interception is handled / execution can be continued
+ */
+static bool uc_handle_insn_ic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
+{
+ struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
+
+ switch (run->s390_sieic.ipa) {
+ case 0xB229: /* ISKE */
+ case 0xB22b: /* SSKE */
+ case 0xB22a: /* RRBE */
+ uc_skey_enable(self);
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Handle the SIEIC exit
* * fail on codes not expected in the test cases
+ * Returns if interception is handled / execution can be continued
*/
static bool uc_handle_sieic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
{
@@ -315,7 +383,10 @@ static bool uc_handle_sieic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
case ICPT_INST:
/* end execution in caller on intercepted instruction */
pr_info("sie instruction interception\n");
- return false;
+ return uc_handle_insn_ic(self);
+ case ICPT_KSS:
+ uc_skey_enable(self);
+ return true;
case ICPT_OPEREXC:
/* operation exception */
TEST_FAIL("sie exception on %.4x%.8x", sie_block->ipa, sie_block->ipb);
@@ -472,4 +543,73 @@ TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_gprs)
ASSERT_EQ(1, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
}
+TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_skey)
+{
+ struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = self->sie_block;
+ struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;
+ u64 test_vaddr = VM_MEM_SIZE - (SZ_1M / 2);
+ struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
+ const u8 skeyvalue = 0x34;
+
+ /* copy test_skey_asm to code_hva / code_gpa */
+ TH_LOG("copy code %p to vm mapped memory %p / %p",
+ &test_skey_asm, (void *)self->code_hva, (void *)self->code_gpa);
+ memcpy((void *)self->code_hva, &test_skey_asm, PAGE_SIZE);
+
+ /* set register content for test_skey_asm to access not mapped memory */
+ sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
+ sync_regs->gprs[5] = self->base_gpa;
+ sync_regs->gprs[6] = test_vaddr;
+ run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
+
+ /* DAT disabled + 64 bit mode */
+ run->psw_mask = 0x0000000180000000ULL;
+ run->psw_addr = self->code_gpa;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(true, uc_handle_exit(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+
+ /* ISKE */
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+
+ /*
+ * Bail out and skip the test after uc_skey_enable was executed but iske
+ * is still intercepted. Instructions are not handled by the kernel.
+ * Thus there is no need to test this here.
+ */
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, sie_block->cpuflags & CPUSTAT_KSS);
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, sie_block->ictl & (ICTL_ISKE | ICTL_SSKE | ICTL_RRBE));
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC, self->run->exit_reason);
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQ(ICPT_INST, sie_block->icptcode);
+ TEST_REQUIRE(sie_block->ipa != 0xb229);
+
+ /* ISKE contd. */
+ ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+ /* assert initial skey (ACC = 0, R & C = 1) */
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x06, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
+ uc_assert_diag44(self);
+
+ /* SSKE + ISKE */
+ sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
+ run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+ ASSERT_EQ(skeyvalue, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
+ uc_assert_diag44(self);
+
+ /* RRBE + ISKE */
+ sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
+ run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+ /* assert R reset but rest of skey unchanged */
+ ASSERT_EQ(skeyvalue & 0xfa, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, sync_regs->gprs[1] & 0x04);
+ uc_assert_diag44(self);
+}
+
TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH v7 2/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_skey VM test case
2024-11-07 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_skey " Christoph Schlameuss
@ 2024-11-08 9:16 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2024-11-11 10:15 ` Janosch Frank
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Schlameuss @ 2024-11-08 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm
Cc: linux-s390, linux-kselftest, Paolo Bonzini, Shuah Khan,
Christian Borntraeger, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda,
David Hildenbrand, schlameuss
Add a test case manipulating s390 storage keys from within the ucontrol
VM.
Storage key instruction (ISKE, SSKE and RRBE) intercepts and
Keyless-subset facility are disabled on first use, where the skeys are
setup by KVM in non ucontrol VMs.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
---
Resending this part as I did slightly mess up the rebase.
---
.../selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h | 6 +
.../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
index 481bd2fd6a32..33fef6fd9617 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/processor.h
@@ -32,4 +32,10 @@ static inline void cpu_relax(void)
barrier();
}
+/* Get the instruction length */
+static inline int insn_length(unsigned char code)
+{
+ return ((((int)code + 64) >> 7) + 1) << 1;
+}
+
#endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
index 3e649b12a0b9..ad95087cc74c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
@@ -79,6 +79,33 @@ asm("test_mem_asm:\n"
" j 0b\n"
);
+/* Test program manipulating storage keys */
+extern char test_skey_asm[];
+asm("test_skey_asm:\n"
+ "xgr %r0, %r0\n"
+
+ "0:\n"
+ " ahi %r0,1\n"
+ " st %r1,0(%r5,%r6)\n"
+
+ " iske %r1,%r6\n"
+ " ahi %r0,1\n"
+ " diag 0,0,0x44\n"
+
+ " sske %r1,%r6\n"
+ " xgr %r1,%r1\n"
+ " iske %r1,%r6\n"
+ " ahi %r0,1\n"
+ " diag 0,0,0x44\n"
+
+ " rrbe %r1,%r6\n"
+ " iske %r1,%r6\n"
+ " ahi %r0,1\n"
+ " diag 0,0,0x44\n"
+
+ " j 0b\n"
+);
+
FIXTURE(uc_kvm)
{
struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block;
@@ -298,8 +325,50 @@ static void uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
}
}
-/* verify SIEIC exit
+/*
+ * Handle the SIEIC exit
* * fail on codes not expected in the test cases
+ * Returns if interception is handled / execution can be continued
+ */
+static void uc_skey_enable(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
+{
+ struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = self->sie_block;
+
+ /* disable KSS */
+ sie_block->cpuflags &= ~CPUSTAT_KSS;
+ /* disable skey inst interception */
+ sie_block->ictl &= ~(ICTL_ISKE | ICTL_SSKE | ICTL_RRBE);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Handle the instruction intercept
+ * Returns if interception is handled / execution can be continued
+ */
+static bool uc_handle_insn_ic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
+{
+ struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = self->sie_block;
+ int ilen = insn_length(sie_block->ipa >> 8);
+ struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
+
+ switch (run->s390_sieic.ipa) {
+ case 0xB229: /* ISKE */
+ case 0xB22b: /* SSKE */
+ case 0xB22a: /* RRBE */
+ uc_skey_enable(self);
+
+ /* rewind to reexecute intercepted instruction */
+ run->psw_addr = run->psw_addr - ilen;
+ pr_info("rewind guest addr to 0x%.16llx\n", run->psw_addr);
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Handle the SIEIC exit
+ * * fail on codes not expected in the test cases
+ * Returns if interception is handled / execution can be continued
*/
static bool uc_handle_sieic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
{
@@ -315,7 +384,10 @@ static bool uc_handle_sieic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
case ICPT_INST:
/* end execution in caller on intercepted instruction */
pr_info("sie instruction interception\n");
- return false;
+ return uc_handle_insn_ic(self);
+ case ICPT_KSS:
+ uc_skey_enable(self);
+ return true;
case ICPT_OPEREXC:
/* operation exception */
TEST_FAIL("sie exception on %.4x%.8x", sie_block->ipa, sie_block->ipb);
@@ -472,4 +544,73 @@ TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_gprs)
ASSERT_EQ(1, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
}
+TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_skey)
+{
+ struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = self->sie_block;
+ struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;
+ u64 test_vaddr = VM_MEM_SIZE - (SZ_1M / 2);
+ struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
+ const u8 skeyvalue = 0x34;
+
+ /* copy test_skey_asm to code_hva / code_gpa */
+ TH_LOG("copy code %p to vm mapped memory %p / %p",
+ &test_skey_asm, (void *)self->code_hva, (void *)self->code_gpa);
+ memcpy((void *)self->code_hva, &test_skey_asm, PAGE_SIZE);
+
+ /* set register content for test_skey_asm to access not mapped memory */
+ sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
+ sync_regs->gprs[5] = self->base_gpa;
+ sync_regs->gprs[6] = test_vaddr;
+ run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
+
+ /* DAT disabled + 64 bit mode */
+ run->psw_mask = 0x0000000180000000ULL;
+ run->psw_addr = self->code_gpa;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(true, uc_handle_exit(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+
+ /* ISKE */
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+
+ /*
+ * Bail out and skip the test after uc_skey_enable was executed but iske
+ * is still intercepted. Instructions are not handled by the kernel.
+ * Thus there is no need to test this here.
+ */
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, sie_block->cpuflags & CPUSTAT_KSS);
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, sie_block->ictl & (ICTL_ISKE | ICTL_SSKE | ICTL_RRBE));
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC, self->run->exit_reason);
+ TEST_ASSERT_EQ(ICPT_INST, sie_block->icptcode);
+ TEST_REQUIRE(sie_block->ipa != 0xb229);
+
+ /* ISKE contd. */
+ ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+ /* assert initial skey (ACC = 0, R & C = 1) */
+ ASSERT_EQ(0x06, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
+ uc_assert_diag44(self);
+
+ /* SSKE + ISKE */
+ sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
+ run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+ ASSERT_EQ(skeyvalue, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
+ uc_assert_diag44(self);
+
+ /* RRBE + ISKE */
+ sync_regs->gprs[1] = skeyvalue;
+ run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
+ /* assert R reset but rest of skey unchanged */
+ ASSERT_EQ(skeyvalue & 0xfa, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, sync_regs->gprs[1] & 0x04);
+ uc_assert_diag44(self);
+}
+
TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_skey VM test case
2024-11-08 9:16 ` Christoph Schlameuss
@ 2024-11-11 10:15 ` Janosch Frank
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2024-11-11 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Schlameuss, kvm
Cc: linux-s390, linux-kselftest, Paolo Bonzini, Shuah Khan,
Christian Borntraeger, Claudio Imbrenda, David Hildenbrand
On 11/8/24 10:16 AM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> Add a test case manipulating s390 storage keys from within the ucontrol
> VM.
>
> Storage key instruction (ISKE, SSKE and RRBE) intercepts and
> Keyless-subset facility are disabled on first use, where the skeys are
> setup by KVM in non ucontrol VMs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v7 3/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Verify reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs
2024-11-07 14:10 [PATCH v7 0/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add ucontrol memory selftests Christoph Schlameuss
2024-11-07 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_map_unmap VM test case Christoph Schlameuss
2024-11-07 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_skey " Christoph Schlameuss
@ 2024-11-07 14:10 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2024-11-07 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Fix whitespace confusion in ucontrol test Christoph Schlameuss
2024-11-07 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] selftests: kvm: s390: correct IP.b length in uc_handle_sieic debug output Christoph Schlameuss
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Schlameuss @ 2024-11-07 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm
Cc: linux-s390, linux-kselftest, Paolo Bonzini, Shuah Khan,
Christian Borntraeger, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda,
David Hildenbrand, schlameuss
Add a test case verifying KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and
KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 cannot be executed on ucontrol VMs.
Executing this test case on not patched kernels will cause a null
pointer dereference in the host kernel.
This is fixed with commit:
commit 7816e58967d0 ("kvm: s390: Reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
index fe5c0d3aabbc..68d17b1ab128 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
@@ -439,6 +439,28 @@ static void uc_assert_diag44(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0x440000, sie_block->ipb);
}
+TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_no_user_region)
+{
+ struct kvm_userspace_memory_region region = {
+ .slot = 1,
+ .guest_phys_addr = self->code_gpa,
+ .memory_size = VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE,
+ .userspace_addr = (uintptr_t)self->code_hva,
+ };
+ struct kvm_userspace_memory_region2 region2 = {
+ .slot = 1,
+ .guest_phys_addr = self->code_gpa,
+ .memory_size = VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE,
+ .userspace_addr = (uintptr_t)self->code_hva,
+ };
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(-1, ioctl(self->vm_fd, KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION, ®ion));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(-1, ioctl(self->vm_fd, KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2, ®ion2));
+ ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+}
+
TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_map_unmap)
{
struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH v7 4/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Fix whitespace confusion in ucontrol test
2024-11-07 14:10 [PATCH v7 0/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add ucontrol memory selftests Christoph Schlameuss
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-07 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Verify reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs Christoph Schlameuss
@ 2024-11-07 14:10 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2024-11-07 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] selftests: kvm: s390: correct IP.b length in uc_handle_sieic debug output Christoph Schlameuss
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Schlameuss @ 2024-11-07 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm
Cc: linux-s390, linux-kselftest, Paolo Bonzini, Shuah Khan,
Christian Borntraeger, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda,
David Hildenbrand, schlameuss
Checkpatch thinks that we're doing a multiplication but we're obviously
not. Fix 4 instances where we adhered to wrong checkpatch advice.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
index 68d17b1ab128..71e76337d9dc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static bool uc_handle_insn_ic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
* * fail on codes not expected in the test cases
* Returns if interception is handled / execution can be continued
*/
-static bool uc_handle_sieic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
+static bool uc_handle_sieic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
{
struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = self->sie_block;
struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static bool uc_handle_sieic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
}
/* verify VM state on exit */
-static bool uc_handle_exit(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
+static bool uc_handle_exit(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
{
struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static bool uc_handle_exit(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
}
/* run the VM until interrupted */
-static int uc_run_once(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
+static int uc_run_once(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
{
int rc;
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int uc_run_once(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
return rc;
}
-static void uc_assert_diag44(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
+static void uc_assert_diag44(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
{
struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = self->sie_block;
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH v7 5/5] selftests: kvm: s390: correct IP.b length in uc_handle_sieic debug output
2024-11-07 14:10 [PATCH v7 0/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Add ucontrol memory selftests Christoph Schlameuss
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-07 14:10 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] selftests: kvm: s390: Fix whitespace confusion in ucontrol test Christoph Schlameuss
@ 2024-11-07 14:10 ` Christoph Schlameuss
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Schlameuss @ 2024-11-07 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm
Cc: linux-s390, linux-kselftest, Paolo Bonzini, Shuah Khan,
Christian Borntraeger, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda,
David Hildenbrand, schlameuss
The length of the interrupt parameters (IP) are:
a: 2 bytes
b: 4 bytes
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
index 71e76337d9dc..549021ada4d2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static bool uc_handle_sieic(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) *self)
struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
/* check SIE interception code */
- pr_info("sieic: 0x%.2x 0x%.4x 0x%.4x\n",
+ pr_info("sieic: 0x%.2x 0x%.4x 0x%.8x\n",
run->s390_sieic.icptcode,
run->s390_sieic.ipa,
run->s390_sieic.ipb);
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread