From: Ramesh Thomas <ramesh.thomas@intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>,
Ben Segal <bpsegal@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] vfio/pci: Support 8-byte PCI loads and stores
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 14:52:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be2c357e-5314-42d2-a085-a211d8a12c5f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0acd183-a3b9-45cb-b0cb-4c7f0ec0b380@intel.com>
On 5/22/2024 5:11 PM, Ramesh Thomas wrote:
> On 5/20/2024 2:02 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>> From: Ramesh Thomas <ramesh.thomas@intel.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 6:30 PM
>>>
>>> On 4/25/2024 9:56 AM, Gerd Bayer wrote:
>>>> From: Ben Segal <bpsegal@us.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> @@ -148,6 +155,15 @@ ssize_t vfio_pci_core_do_io_rw(struct
>>> vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool test_mem,
>>>> else
>>>> fillable = 0;
>>>>
>>>> +#if defined(ioread64) && defined(iowrite64)
>>>
>>> Can we check for #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT instead? In x86, ioread64 and
>>> iowrite64 get declared as extern functions if CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP is
>>> defined and this check always fails. In include/asm-generic/io.h,
>>> asm-generic/iomap.h gets included which declares them as extern
>>> functions.
>>>
>>> One more thing to consider io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h and
>>> io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h, if included would define it as a macro that
>>> calls a function that rw 32 bits back to back.
>>
>> I don't see the problem here. when the defined check fails it falls
>> back to back-to-back vfio_pci_core_iordwr32(). there is no need to
>> do it in an indirect way via including io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h.
>
> The issue is iowrite64 and iowrite64 was not getting defined when
> CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP was not defined, even though the architecture
Sorry, I meant they were not getting defined when CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP
*was defined*. The only definitions of ioread64 and iowrite64 in the
code path are in asm/io.h where they are surrounded by #ifndef
CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP
> implemented the 64 bit rw functions readq and writeq.
> io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h and io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h define them and map
> them to generic implementations in lib/iomap.c. The implementation calls
> the 64 bit rw functions if present, otherwise does 32 bit back to back
> rw. Besides it also has sanity checks for port numbers in the iomap
> path. I think it is better to rely on this existing generic method than
> implementing the checks at places where iowrite64 and ioread64 get
> called, at least in the IOMAP path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-23 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-25 16:56 [PATCH v3 0/3] vfio/pci: Support 8-byte PCI loads and stores Gerd Bayer
2024-04-25 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] vfio/pci: Extract duplicated code into macro Gerd Bayer
2024-04-29 16:31 ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-17 14:22 ` Gerd Bayer
2024-04-29 20:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-29 22:11 ` Alex Williamson
2024-04-29 22:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-21 15:47 ` Gerd Bayer
2024-04-30 8:16 ` liulongfang
2024-05-17 10:47 ` Ramesh Thomas
2024-04-25 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] vfio/pci: Support 8-byte PCI loads and stores Gerd Bayer
2024-04-29 16:31 ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-21 15:50 ` Gerd Bayer
2024-05-17 10:29 ` Ramesh Thomas
2024-05-20 9:02 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-23 0:11 ` Ramesh Thomas
2024-05-23 21:52 ` Ramesh Thomas [this message]
2024-05-21 16:40 ` Gerd Bayer
2024-05-22 13:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-22 23:57 ` Ramesh Thomas
2024-04-25 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] vfio/pci: Continue to refactor vfio_pci_core_do_io_rw Gerd Bayer
2024-04-28 6:59 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-29 16:32 ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-21 16:43 ` Gerd Bayer
2024-05-17 11:41 ` Ramesh Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be2c357e-5314-42d2-a085-a211d8a12c5f@intel.com \
--to=ramesh.thomas@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=bpsegal@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox