public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ramesh Thomas <ramesh.thomas@intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ben Segal <bpsegal@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] vfio/pci: Support 8-byte PCI loads and stores
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 14:52:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <be2c357e-5314-42d2-a085-a211d8a12c5f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0acd183-a3b9-45cb-b0cb-4c7f0ec0b380@intel.com>

On 5/22/2024 5:11 PM, Ramesh Thomas wrote:
> On 5/20/2024 2:02 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>> From: Ramesh Thomas <ramesh.thomas@intel.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 6:30 PM
>>>
>>> On 4/25/2024 9:56 AM, Gerd Bayer wrote:
>>>> From: Ben Segal <bpsegal@us.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> @@ -148,6 +155,15 @@ ssize_t vfio_pci_core_do_io_rw(struct
>>> vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool test_mem,
>>>>            else
>>>>                fillable = 0;
>>>>
>>>> +#if defined(ioread64) && defined(iowrite64)
>>>
>>> Can we check for #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT instead? In x86, ioread64 and
>>> iowrite64 get declared as extern functions if CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP is
>>> defined and this check always fails. In include/asm-generic/io.h,
>>> asm-generic/iomap.h gets included which declares them as extern 
>>> functions.
>>>
>>> One more thing to consider io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h and
>>> io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h, if included would define it as a macro that
>>> calls a function that rw 32 bits back to back.
>>
>> I don't see the problem here. when the defined check fails it falls
>> back to back-to-back vfio_pci_core_iordwr32(). there is no need to
>> do it in an indirect way via including io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h.
> 
> The issue is iowrite64 and iowrite64 was not getting defined when 
> CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP was not defined, even though the architecture 

Sorry, I meant they were not getting defined when CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP 
*was defined*. The only definitions of ioread64 and iowrite64 in the 
code path are in asm/io.h where they are surrounded by #ifndef 
CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP

> implemented the 64 bit rw functions readq and writeq. 
> io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h and io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h define them and map 
> them to generic implementations in lib/iomap.c. The implementation calls 
> the 64 bit rw functions if present, otherwise does 32 bit back to back 
> rw. Besides it also has sanity checks for port numbers in the iomap 
> path. I think it is better to rely on this existing generic method than 
> implementing the checks at places where iowrite64 and ioread64 get 
> called, at least in the IOMAP path.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-23 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-25 16:56 [PATCH v3 0/3] vfio/pci: Support 8-byte PCI loads and stores Gerd Bayer
2024-04-25 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] vfio/pci: Extract duplicated code into macro Gerd Bayer
2024-04-29 16:31   ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-17 14:22     ` Gerd Bayer
2024-04-29 20:09   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-29 22:11     ` Alex Williamson
2024-04-29 22:33       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-21 15:47         ` Gerd Bayer
2024-04-30  8:16       ` liulongfang
2024-05-17 10:47   ` Ramesh Thomas
2024-04-25 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] vfio/pci: Support 8-byte PCI loads and stores Gerd Bayer
2024-04-29 16:31   ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-21 15:50     ` Gerd Bayer
2024-05-17 10:29   ` Ramesh Thomas
2024-05-20  9:02     ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-23  0:11       ` Ramesh Thomas
2024-05-23 21:52         ` Ramesh Thomas [this message]
2024-05-21 16:40     ` Gerd Bayer
2024-05-22 13:48       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-22 23:57       ` Ramesh Thomas
2024-04-25 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] vfio/pci: Continue to refactor vfio_pci_core_do_io_rw Gerd Bayer
2024-04-28  6:59   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-29 16:32   ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-21 16:43     ` Gerd Bayer
2024-05-17 11:41   ` Ramesh Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=be2c357e-5314-42d2-a085-a211d8a12c5f@intel.com \
    --to=ramesh.thomas@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bpsegal@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox