Re: [PATCH Kernel v20 6/8] vfio iommu: Update UNMAP_DMA ioctl to get dirty bitmap before unmap

Kirti Wankhede
2020-05-15T06:47:18Z

On 5/15/2020 11:17 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 09:46:43 +0530
> Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5/15/2020 8:57 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 15 May 2020 02:07:45 +0530
>>> Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> DMA mapped pages, including those pinned by mdev vendor drivers, might
>>>> get unpinned and unmapped while migration is active and device is still
>>>> running. For example, in pre-copy phase while guest driver could access
>>>> those pages, host device or vendor driver can dirty these mapped pages.
>>>> Such pages should be marked dirty so as to maintain memory consistency
>>>> for a user making use of dirty page tracking.
>>>>
>>>> To get bitmap during unmap, user should allocate memory for bitmap, set
>>>> it all zeros, set size of allocated memory, set page size to be
>>>> considered for bitmap and set flag VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 10 ++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>>>> index b76d3b14abfd..a1dc57bcece5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>>>> @@ -195,11 +195,15 @@ static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
>>>> static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(struct vfio_dma *dma, size_t pgsize)
>>>> {
>>>> uint64_t npages = dma->size / pgsize;
>>>> + size_t bitmap_size;
>>>>
>>>> if (npages > DIRTY_BITMAP_PAGES_MAX)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> - dma->bitmap = kvzalloc(DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + /* Allocate extra 64 bits which are used for bitmap manipulation */
>>>> + bitmap_size = DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages) + sizeof(u64);
>>>> +
>>>> + dma->bitmap = kvzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> if (!dma->bitmap)
>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -999,23 +1003,25 @@ static int verify_bitmap_size(uint64_t npages, uint64_t bitmap_size)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>>>> - struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap)
>>>> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap,
>>>> + struct vfio_bitmap *bitmap)
>>>> {
>>>> - uint64_t mask;
>>>> struct vfio_dma *dma, *dma_last = NULL;
>>>> - size_t unmapped = 0;
>>>> + size_t unmapped = 0, pgsize;
>>>> int ret = 0, retries = 0;
>>>> + unsigned long pgshift;
>>>>
>>>> mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>>>>
>>>> - mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap)) - 1;
>>>> + pgshift = __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap);
>>>> + pgsize = (size_t)1 << pgshift;
>>>>
>>>> - if (unmap->iova & mask) {
>>>> + if (unmap->iova & (pgsize - 1)) {
>>>> ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> goto unlock;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - if (!unmap->size || unmap->size & mask) {
>>>> + if (!unmap->size || unmap->size & (pgsize - 1)) {
>>>> ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> goto unlock;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1026,9 +1032,15 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>>>> goto unlock;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - WARN_ON(mask & PAGE_MASK);
>>>> -again:
>>>> + /* When dirty tracking is enabled, allow only min supported pgsize */
>>>> + if ((unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
>>>> + (!iommu->dirty_page_tracking || (bitmap->pgsize != pgsize))) {
>>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> + goto unlock;
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> + WARN_ON((pgsize - 1) & PAGE_MASK);
>>>> +again:
>>>> /*
>>>> * vfio-iommu-type1 (v1) - User mappings were coalesced together to
>>>> * avoid tracking individual mappings. This means that the granularity
>>>> @@ -1066,6 +1078,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>>>> ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> goto unlock;
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova + unmap->size - 1, 0);
>>>> if (dma && dma->iova + dma->size != unmap->iova + unmap->size) {
>>>> ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> @@ -1083,6 +1096,23 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>>>> if (dma->task->mm != current->mm)
>>>> break;
>>>>
>>>> + if ((unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
>>>> + (dma_last != dma)) {
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * mark all pages dirty if all pages are pinned and
>>>> + * mapped
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (dma->iommu_mapped)
>>>> + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0,
>>>> + dma->size >> pgshift);
>>>
>>> Nit, all the callers of update_user_bitmap() precede the call with this
>>> identical operation, we should probably push it into the function to do
>>> it.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = update_user_bitmap(bitmap->data, dma,
>>>> + unmap->iova, pgsize);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> As noted last time, the above is just busy work if pfn_list is not
>>> already empty. The entire code block above should be moved to after
>>> the block below. Thanks,
>>>
>>
>> pfn_list will be empty for IOMMU backed devices where all pages are
>> pinned and mapped,
>
> Unless we're making use of the selective dirtying introduced in patch
> 8/8 or the container is shared with non-IOMMU backed mdevs.
>
>> but those should be reported as dirty.
>
> I'm confused how that justifies or requires this ordering.
>

1. non IOMMU mdev device:
- vendor driver pins pages
- pfn_list is not empty
- device dma or write to pinned pages

2. IOMMU backed mdev device or vfio device, but smart driver which pins
required pages
- vendor driver pins pages
- pfn_list is not empty
- device dma or write to pinned pages

3. IOMMU backed mdev device or vfio device, driver is not smart
- pages are pinned and mapped during attach
- pfn_list is empty
- device dma or write to any of pinned pages

For case 3, here this function does bitmap_set(dma->bitmap), that is
mark all pages dirty and then accordingly copy bitmap to user buffer.
Copying dma->bitmap logic remains same.

>> So moved it
>> back above empty pfn_list check.
>
> Sorry, it still doesn't make any sense to me, and with no discussion I
> can't differentiate ignored comments from discarded comments.
>
> Pages in the pfn_list contribute to the dirty bitmap when they're
> pinned, we don't depend on pfn_list when reporting the dirty bitmap
> except for re-populating pfn_list dirtied pages after the bitmap has
> been cleared. We're unmapping the dma, so that's not the case here.
> Also since update_user_bitmap() shifts the bitmap in place now, any
> repetitive calls will give us incorrect results.

Right, but this is unmapping and freeing vfio_dma

> Therefore, as I see
> it, we _can_ take the branch below and when we do any work we've done
> above is not only wasted but may lead to incorrect data copied to
> the user if we shift dma->bitmap in place more than once. Please
> explain in more detail if you believe this is still correct. Thanks,
>

In this case also bitmap copy to user happens once, (dma_last != dma)
takes care of making sure that its called only once.

Thanks,
Kirti

> Alex
>
>>>
>>>> if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dma->pfn_list)) {
>>>> struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap nb_unmap;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -2447,17 +2477,40 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>>>>
>>>> } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA) {
>>>> struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap unmap;
>>>> - long ret;
>>>> + struct vfio_bitmap bitmap = { 0 };
>>>> + int ret;
>>>>
>>>> minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap, size);
>>>>
>>>> if (copy_from_user(&unmap, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
>>>> return -EFAULT;
>>>>
>>>> - if (unmap.argsz < minsz || unmap.flags)
>>>> + if (unmap.argsz < minsz ||
>>>> + unmap.flags & ~VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> - ret = vfio_dma_do_unmap(iommu, &unmap);
>>>> + if (unmap.flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) {
>>>> + unsigned long pgshift;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (unmap.argsz < (minsz + sizeof(bitmap)))
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (copy_from_user(&bitmap,
>>>> + (void __user *)(arg + minsz),
>>>> + sizeof(bitmap)))
>>>> + return -EFAULT;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!access_ok((void __user *)bitmap.data, bitmap.size))
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + pgshift = __ffs(bitmap.pgsize);
>>>> + ret = verify_bitmap_size(unmap.size >> pgshift,
>>>> + bitmap.size);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = vfio_dma_do_unmap(iommu, &unmap, &bitmap);
>>>> if (ret)
>>>> return ret;
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>>>> index 123de3bc2dce..0a0c7315ddd6 100644
>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>>>> @@ -1048,12 +1048,22 @@ struct vfio_bitmap {
>>>> * field. No guarantee is made to the user that arbitrary unmaps of iova
>>>> * or size different from those used in the original mapping call will
>>>> * succeed.
>>>> + * VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP should be set to get dirty bitmap
>>>> + * before unmapping IO virtual addresses. When this flag is set, user must
>>>> + * provide data[] as structure vfio_bitmap. User must allocate memory to get
>>>> + * bitmap, zero the bitmap memory and must set size of allocated memory in
>>>> + * vfio_bitmap.size field. A bit in bitmap represents one page of user provided
>>>> + * page size in 'pgsize', consecutively starting from iova offset. Bit set
>>>> + * indicates page at that offset from iova is dirty. Bitmap of pages in the
>>>> + * range of unmapped size is returned in vfio_bitmap.data
>>>> */
>>>> struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap {
>>>> __u32 argsz;
>>>> __u32 flags;
>>>> +#define VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP (1 << 0)
>>>> __u64 iova; /* IO virtual address */
>>>> __u64 size; /* Size of mapping (bytes) */
>>>> + __u8 data[];
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> #define VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 14)
>>>
>>
>