From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/idle: use dynamic halt poll
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:26:10 +0200
Message-ID: <bf7edb81-e4aa-d635-82a6-81b173590f34@redhat.com>
References: <1498130534-26568-1-git-send-email-root@ip-172-31-39-62.us-west-2.compute.internal>
 <1498130534-26568-3-git-send-email-root@ip-172-31-39-62.us-west-2.compute.internal>
 <4444ffc8-9e7b-5bd2-20da-af422fe834cc@redhat.com>
 <2245bef7-b668-9265-f3f8-3b63d71b1033@gmail.com>
 <7d085956-2573-212f-44f4-86104beba9bb@gmail.com>
 <fd7acd49-9d37-4495-79cd-250e3b54cac2@redhat.com>
 <CANRm+Cyd4ycNdDN8=M66re5RhnrJF=3HPiPuJeMAUgLRb1qBcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <05ec7efc-fb9c-ae24-5770-66fc472545a4@redhat.com>
 <20170627134043.GA1487@potion>
 <2771f905-d1b0-b118-9ae9-db5fb87f877c@redhat.com>
 <20170627142251.GB1487@potion>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
        Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, tony.luck@intel.com,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, mchehab@kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, krzk@kernel.org,
        jpoimboe@redhat.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>,
        Robert Gerst <rgerst@gmail.com>,
        Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
        douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, dvlasenk@redhat.com,
To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170627142251.GB1487@potion>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org



On 27/06/2017 16:22, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> vcpu_is_preempted() on current cpu cannot return true, AFAIK.

Of course.  I must have been thinking of an older version of the
vcpu_is_preempted patch (at some point the guest was the one that set
preempted to 0).

Paolo