From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 199727] CPU freezes in KVM guests during high IO load on host
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:26:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-199727-28872-gXV1Zq937Z@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-199727-28872@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199727
--- Comment #16 from Stefan Hajnoczi (stefanha@gmail.com) ---
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 at 08:01, <bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199727
>
> --- Comment #15 from Roland Kletzing (devzero@web.de) ---
> yes, i was using cache=none and io_uring also caused issues.
>
> >aio=threads avoids softlockups because the preadv(2)/pwritev(2)/fdatasync(2)
> > syscalls run in worker threads that don't take the QEMU global mutex.
> >Therefore vcpu threads can execute even when I/O is stuck in the kernel due
> to
> >a lock.
>
> yes, that was a long search/journey to get to this information/params....
>
> regarding io_uring - after proxmox enabled it as default, it was taken back
> again after some issues had been reported.
>
> have look at:
> https://github.com/proxmox/qemu-server/blob/master/debian/changelog
>
> maybe it's not ready for primetime yet !?
>
> -- Proxmox Support Team <support@proxmox.com> Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:53:44
> +0200
> qemu-server (7.0-11) bullseye; urgency=medium
> <snip>
> * lvm: avoid the use of io_uring for now
> <snip>
> -- Proxmox Support Team <support@proxmox.com> Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:08:48
> +0200
> qemu-server (7.0-10) bullseye; urgency=medium
> <snip>
> * avoid using io_uring for drives backed by LVM and configured for
> write-back
> or write-through cache
> <snip>
> -- Proxmox Support Team <support@proxmox.com> Mon, 05 Jul 2021 20:49:50
> +0200
> qemu-server (7.0-6) bullseye; urgency=medium
> <snip>
> * For now do not use io_uring for drives backed by Ceph RBD, with KRBD and
> write-back or write-through cache enabled, as in that case some
> polling/IO
> may hang in QEMU 6.0.
> <snip>
Changelog messages mention cache=writethrough and cache=writeback,
which are both problematic because host memory pressure will interfere
with guest performance. That is probably not an issue with io_uring
per se, just another symptom of using cache=writeback/writethrough in
cases where it's inappropriate.
If you have trace data showing io_uring_enter(2) hanging with
cache=none then Jens Axboe and other io_uring developers may be able
to help resolve that.
Stefan
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-08 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-199727-28872@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2021-08-20 17:25 ` [Bug 199727] CPU freezes in KVM guests during high IO load on host bugzilla-daemon
2021-08-21 8:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-08-22 12:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-08-29 14:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-01-13 12:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-10 13:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-12 0:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-12 10:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-24 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-25 9:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-02 13:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-07 19:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-08 6:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-08 8:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-08 8:26 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2022-03-26 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-06 23:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-06 23:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-11-29 10:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 13:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 13:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 13:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 13:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 19:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-08-25 7:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-08-25 7:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-08-25 7:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-09 7:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-09 8:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-09 9:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-199727-28872-gXV1Zq937Z@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).