kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 207357] New: Paravirtualized spinlocks causing very severe performance degradation with 3rd gen AMD Threadripper
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:08:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-207357-28872@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207357

            Bug ID: 207357
           Summary: Paravirtualized spinlocks causing very severe
                    performance degradation with 3rd gen AMD Threadripper
           Product: Virtualization
           Version: unspecified
    Kernel Version: 5.6.5
          Hardware: x86-64
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: kvm
          Assignee: virtualization_kvm@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
          Reporter: abj0000@gmail.com
        Regression: No

I've noticed very severe performance degradation on one of the few benchmarks I
have been running, and narrowed it down the paravirtualized spinlocks.

Host:
- Fedora 32 with kernel 5.6.5 / Proxmox 6.1-8 (tried both)
- Qemu 4.1 / 4.2 / 5.0.0 rc3 (tried all of these)
- AMD Threadripper 3970X (Zen 2) CPU, 32C/64T
- 64GB of RAM, mostly allocated to 1GB huge pages.

Guest:
- Fedora 32 with kernel 5.6.5

The VM has the following key specs (through libvirt):
  <memory unit="GiB">16</memory>
  <memoryBacking>
    <hugepages/>
  </memoryBacking>
  <vcpu placement="static">48</vcpu>
  <features>
    <acpi/>
    <apic/>
    <vmport state="off"/>
  </features>
  <cpu mode="host-passthrough" check="none">
    <topology sockets="1" dies="1" cores="24" threads="2"/>
    <feature policy="require" name="topoext"/>
  </cpu>

I'm passing through an NVMe drive and running a RocksDB benchmark on it.

Bare metal scores about 1 000 000 Op/s, while the guest scores about 180 000,
i.e only 18% of bare metal. CPU usage on the host is about 900%.
CPUID on 0x40000001: eax=0x01003afb

If I add <pvspinlock state="off"/> or <hint-dedicated state="on"/>, then the
guest scores very close to bare metal in the benchmark, with CPU usage on the
host at 4700%, which means that it's successfully using resources at its
disposal.
If I understand correctly, adding the above zeroes the KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT
bit in the guest's CPUID, and therefore deactivates the paravirtualized
spinlocks.
CPUID on 0x40000001: eax=0x01003a7b

If it's of any help, I also noticed further performance degradation doing the
following:
- Pinning the vCPUs:
  <cputune> 
    <vcpupin vcpu="0" cpuset="8"/>
    <vcpupin vcpu="1" cpuset="40"/>
    <vcpupin vcpu="2" cpuset="9"/>
    <vcpupin vcpu="3" cpuset="41"/>
   ...
    <vcpupin vcpu="46" cpuset="31"/>
    <vcpupin vcpu="47" cpuset="63"/>
  </cputune>
- Adding <cache mode="passthrough" />

Enabling AVIC (AMD's equivalent to APICv) on kvm_amd and disabling x2apic and
nested virtualization to make it work did not help restore performance.

For comparison, I also tested VMware's ESXi 7.0 and out of the box got a very
high percentage of bare metal performance on that benchmark. That led me to
think it could be a bug in KVM.

Disclaimer: I'm just a simple enthusiast who doesn't even understand spinlocks,
TLB flushes, VM exists, IPI, APIC, etc. But I'm available to run commands and
provide you with their outputs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2020-04-19 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-19 17:08 bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2020-04-19 17:12 ` [Bug 207357] Paravirtualized spinlocks causing very severe performance degradation with 3rd gen AMD Threadripper bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-207357-28872@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).