From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB37BC43461 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 02:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834F721941 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 02:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730771AbgIJCmi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:42:38 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51358 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730774AbgIJCkb (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 22:40:31 -0400 From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 209155] KVM Linux guest with more than 1 CPU panics after commit 404d5d7bff0d419fe11c7eaebca9ec8f25258f95 on old CPU (Phenom x4) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:14:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo virtualization_kvm@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Virtualization X-Bugzilla-Component: kvm X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: wanpeng.li@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: virtualization_kvm@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209155 --- Comment #13 from Wanpeng Li (wanpeng.li@hotmail.com) --- (In reply to Paul K. from comment #12) > Verified fix works in both the bisected revision and v5.9-rc3. I have not > tried to apply the three patches sent to the mailing list. Should I? Please have a try, we test these three patches on AMD ROME with nrips=0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.