From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 660C5239E61; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 02:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758161945; cv=none; b=Dylokw09RYD8/WCftvnPurfk49ft85dUQXNIs6x3GzIURsLfSvcWGmzx9OD0wYCn+DKDpSRhviQvqweatnh9gem0XSgzNtrVgfxc+oyHrUgR9JXY2Ri4JzslgjfYI88NxZYZ6T+ClkyhABYnZagdex2YviHLiLi5HP1eXPDoZaE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758161945; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r1wkqHVLUHoLO9U5TMOClU5sna6Gh+lyKvPi9baXPvg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=I8ni24uPobQyvwuXfWYrxlBI9r7RZFvFzBdg/BjExUPB0y4yvq0765WZ4EwNC3ec4/S2wqGB5Ks+JjLFslanwja5IMuXeSaQEk/I6YBPINC6Qw/H9tUzbnEvv/AQr+Ed0KnQUoK7zKcGvMc/fBqFPpYX83P9otARtIoQRMK+4AM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=UKTZDKit; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="UKTZDKit" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1758161943; x=1789697943; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r1wkqHVLUHoLO9U5TMOClU5sna6Gh+lyKvPi9baXPvg=; b=UKTZDKitWuG91aSX3b33WxoCpBWir+pt6Zy7Vuo7QjxxHP7z5ui8Tsxn 8Uddd1h5ssC7O9//rGDqJ28+KrdsxYhQZIY6PxUxgqVA522b0fN3Exxr/ iTdN/9ejt0YoCweQXMRTrq4Z6YJUMT/bY6+UgEEJlgga8onORv9dp7EdQ lirAC+XX7h/77GbbL/0GbG5HxMRVWgpMKwbs/g9cA+rLvQz6G9k+dHqER g1svUq4c7xXnBZHwdstT5mDjiD6b4rmRw0z9E5ksBoeD1nPz4kaabmiYa BRn8kg06k2NKncIKfkSDzTZVxLB0pcFdkxXmDRWEsJRpW9+uRFJ0f/8Aa w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0D/Xe31CTaaAVAsaOovtJA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: qCIKQYsMSV+3+G62blZ45A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11556"; a="71163179" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,273,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="71163179" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2025 19:19:03 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: w3+wklgBRg2mH8TTa+6i+A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: H/hRwk/zQ/yWEg0NDemQ5g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,273,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="199113616" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.238.0.107]) ([10.238.0.107]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Sep 2025 19:19:00 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:18:57 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 19/41] KVM: x86: Enable CET virtualization for VMX and advertise to userspace To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tom Lendacky , Mathias Krause , John Allen , Rick Edgecombe , Chao Gao , Maxim Levitsky , Xiaoyao Li , Zhang Yi Z References: <20250912232319.429659-1-seanjc@google.com> <20250912232319.429659-20-seanjc@google.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Binbin Wu In-Reply-To: <20250912232319.429659-20-seanjc@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/13/2025 7:22 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: [...] > > +static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_basic_no_hw_errcode(void) > +{ > + return vmcs_config.basic & VMX_BASIC_NO_HW_ERROR_CODE_CC; > +} > + I think "_cc" should be appended to the function name, although it would make the function name longer. Without "_cc", the meaning is different and confusing.