Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] x86, lib: Add WBNOINVD helper functions

[Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>]

On 1/22/25 16:24, Kevin Loughlin wrote:
> +static __always_inline void wbnoinvd(void)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * WBNOINVD is encoded as 0xf3 0x0f 0x09. Making this
> +	 * encoding explicit ensures compatibility with older versions of
> +	 * binutils, which may not know about WBNOINVD.

This kinda pokes at one of my pet peeves. It's writing a comment where
code would do. I'd *much* rather write a function that explains to you
in code that "WBNOINVD is encoded as 0xf3 0x0f 0x09":

static __always_inline void native_wbnoinvd(void)
{
        asm volatile(".byte 0xf3,0x0f,0x09\n\t": : :"memory");
}

instead of writing out a comment. It's kinda silly to have to write out
the encoding explicitly in a comment and then have to rewrite it in the
code.