Re: [PATCH 4/7] s390x/pci: use a PCI Group structure

[Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>]

On 9/25/20 5:41 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 11:34:29 -0400
> Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> We use a S390PCIGroup structure to hold the information related to a
>> zPCI Function group.
>>
>> This allows us to be ready to support multiple groups and to retrieve
>> the group information from the host.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c  | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h  | 10 ++++++++++
>>   hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>>   3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
>> index 92146a2..3015d86 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
>> @@ -737,6 +737,46 @@ static void s390_pci_iommu_free(S390pciState *s, PCIBus *bus, int32_t devfn)
>>       object_unref(OBJECT(iommu));
>>   }
>>   
>> +static S390PCIGroup *s390_grp_create(int ug)
> 
> I think you made the identifiers a bit too compact :)
> s390_group_create() is not that long, and I have no idea what the 'ug'
> (ugh :) parameter is supposed to mean.
> 

Ha :)  Message received, something like s390_group_create(int id) is 
probably more appropriate.

>> +{
>> +    S390PCIGroup *grp;
> 
> group?
> 
>> +    S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb();
>> +
>> +    grp = g_new0(S390PCIGroup, 1);
>> +    grp->ug = ug;
>> +    QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&s->zpci_grps, grp, link);
> 
> zpci_groups? I think you get the idea :)
> 

Yep, thanks!

>> +    return grp;
>> +}
> 
> (...)
> 
> No objection to the patch in general.
>